The trade unions could be doing Ed Miliband – and all of us – a favour

No doubt, both Conservatives and Liberal Democrats, joined by a select band of Blairite survivors, would be rather chipper if the trade union chiefs currently making threatening noises about cutting Labour Party funding  turn out to really mean it.

But the real benefit could be much wider: if Labour loses a large chunk of its funding from trade unions bosses then it could unlock the long-running saga that political party funding reform.

Back in December I wrote:

The strong historical links between trade unions and the Labour Party means that any proposals which would curb the amount unions can give to Labour are fiercely opposed.

But Labour is not the permanent party of government.

Requiring union members to opt in explicitly to make donations and choose which party they wish their funds to go to would certainly hurt Labour relative to other parties. However, becoming the conduit of mass funding to all the main political parties (remember just how many trade unionists vote for parties other than Labour) would make other parties pay more attention to the concerns of trade union members. It may weaken support for Labour and reduce the role of trade union bosses, but it would strengthen the political influence of trade union members. Were it not for the weight of history, this move would make sense. As it is, it is very unlikely.

If Labour loses a large chunk of its trade union funding then the financial pain of political party funding reform would start looking rather small – especially as backing meaningful reform would let Ed Miliband push David Cameron hard on the sort of low donation cap that would block predominantly large Conservative donations.

Moreover, whilst party funding reform would strengthen the influence of individual trade union members, the one clear loser would be the senior trade union figures who currently hold the purse strings. And if they are gunning for Ed Miliband, is weakening their position really so unthinkable for him?

In fact, even if those senior trade unionists are bluffing, they are offering up to Ed Miliband the perfect opportunity to be tough (standing up to them), to be consensual (agreeing to the previous independently drawn up proposals for funding reform )and to be on the side of the many, not the few (getting the big money out of politics).

Will he take the opportunity?

* Mark Pack has written 101 Ways To Win An Election and produces a monthly newsletter about the Liberal Democrats.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/26676 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

One Comment

  • Interesting perspective but I don’t think so…
    If Labour loses a large chunk of its trade union funding then the financial pain of political party funding reform would start looking rather small – especially as backing meaningful reform would let Ed Miliband push David Cameron hard on the sort of low donation cap that would block predominantly large Conservative donations.

    Ed Miliband has demonstrated that he can’t hit a cow’s @rse with a banjo. If Labour have funding problems, I think this will merely weaken Ed Miliband himself and some of his leadership team. The Unions have been too patient and they have some buyers remorse, but they are not stupid, their funding is allocated in such a way that they have influence over individual MPs. When they work together they will bring Ed down relatively quickly, as the MPs will start to peel away from Ed as their personal Union funding dries up. I don’t think they’ll leave it too much longer either, they’ll want the next leader to have time to get established.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarAndrew 2nd Aug - 1:18pm
    Manfarang, Letter trade is falling, butparcel trade is expanding. Thousands and thousands of micro-businesses across the Uk depend on the Royal mail, which in the...
  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 2nd Aug - 1:15pm
    "Sanders believes that "no single financial institution should have holdings so extensive that its failure would send the world economy into crisis. If an institution...
  • User AvatarCaron Lindsay 2nd Aug - 1:12pm
    @John Tilley - Bernie has some good ideas and in these vote-match things most Lib Dems seem to end up closest to him. He won't...
  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 2nd Aug - 1:06pm
    "Sanders said in 1998 that investment banks and commercial banks should remain separate entities." Good idea, even now.
  • User AvatarJohn Tilley 2nd Aug - 1:05pm
    If Liberal Democrats are to learn from anyone called Sanders, it should be Adrian Sanders.
  • User AvatarSimon McGrath 2nd Aug - 1:02pm
    "I’m not saying quotas are a perfect solution for anything but I do believe that if we used them to encourage more women, BAME etc...