The weekend debate: Does the Prime Minister’s pay make a useful yardstick?

Here’s your starter for ten in our weekend slot where we throw up an idea or thought for debate…

The level of the Prime Minister’s pay has become a widely used yardstick for other public sector pay – which suggestions of extra scrutiny for the pay deals of people who are paid more than the PM and counts or complaints about how many people are paid more.

But does the Prime Minister’s pay (or rather salary and pension, for the benefits in kind such as accommodation are rarely factored in) make for a sensible yardstick? And if not, is there an alternative that should be used?

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

7 Comments

  • It is not just the benefits in kind that people don’t factor in they also tend to ignore the fact the PM also gets a 65K MP salary, generous expenses and the opportunity to make a mint when their employers sack them.

    But the reason why it is silly to use the PM’s salary as a yardstick is because it is a job that requires no qualifications or experience. The PM’s job is a very special case and therefore not the one by which others should be judged.

  • “The last great government was the 1945 – 1950 government which created the NHS and transformed the lives of millions for the better.”

    As this is a discussion thread I’ll lob in these little hand grenades 🙂

    Objectively you could compare the 97-01 Government in terms of its constitutional changes (Scottish/Welsh devolution, Human Rights Act etc). Arguably the 45 Government would have introduced a welfare state & NHS in some form whoever had been elected.

    The 79-87 government was a government of very radical change – it’s a matter of political perspective whether it was a great government (on balance not IMO) but the changes it made were driven through by the Prime Minister so looked at from the point of view of “did she deliver on her political agenda” you have to give Thatcher plaudits for having done so.

    (There praising Blair AND Thatcher in one go – that should ensure I lose the maximum amount of votes!)

  • David Le Grice 26th Mar '11 - 8:35pm

    If it is to be used as a yardstick then It should apply to private sector public service providers (Serco et al.) who can already out compete the public sector for the best talent with high salaries.

  • To use PM’s pay as a yardstick displays amazing ignorance. The PM is a politician who, together with colleagues prescibes policy usually via parliament. Civil servants and chief execs of Councils implement those policies by managing staff and resources. They are managers. Managers are trained professionals – there are University qualifications for managers. The comparison is like that between apples and oranges.
    I was disappointed to see the comparison in the last Lib Dem manifesto but that document is now irrelevant anyway!

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarGordon 1st Oct - 7:48pm
    Syria's tragedy is that there are three overlapping wars being fought out in its territory. Some are calling it the "first theatre of WW3". Scarily,...
  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 1st Oct - 7:45pm
    As a recent broadcast showed the Met Office as made huge strides since Michael Fish made his famous forecast. We remember it well, a row...
  • User AvatarRob Parsons 1st Oct - 7:39pm
    Paul We do campaign as you say on bread and butter stuff, but I think we have often been drawn in to extolling the EU...
  • User AvatarRob Parsons 1st Oct - 7:30pm
    Barry There is a lot of stuff I didn't mention, not just wealth creation. As you noted, I have only 500 words - LDV like...
  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 1st Oct - 7:28pm
    Stevan Rose: Continuous pressure is needed. There are severe flaws in US democracy. What they do affects us all, for instance George W Bush invaded...
  • User AvatarRob Parsons 1st Oct - 7:24pm
    Phil It doesn't really work to say neoliberal is an abusive term. I'm not using it abusively. I am using it in the sense you...