The weekend debate: Does the Prime Minister’s pay make a useful yardstick?

Here’s your starter for ten in our weekend slot where we throw up an idea or thought for debate…

The level of the Prime Minister’s pay has become a widely used yardstick for other public sector pay – which suggestions of extra scrutiny for the pay deals of people who are paid more than the PM and counts or complaints about how many people are paid more.

But does the Prime Minister’s pay (or rather salary and pension, for the benefits in kind such as accommodation are rarely factored in) make for a sensible yardstick? And if not, is there an alternative that should be used?

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

7 Comments

  • It is not just the benefits in kind that people don’t factor in they also tend to ignore the fact the PM also gets a 65K MP salary, generous expenses and the opportunity to make a mint when their employers sack them.

    But the reason why it is silly to use the PM’s salary as a yardstick is because it is a job that requires no qualifications or experience. The PM’s job is a very special case and therefore not the one by which others should be judged.

  • “The last great government was the 1945 – 1950 government which created the NHS and transformed the lives of millions for the better.”

    As this is a discussion thread I’ll lob in these little hand grenades :-)

    Objectively you could compare the 97-01 Government in terms of its constitutional changes (Scottish/Welsh devolution, Human Rights Act etc). Arguably the 45 Government would have introduced a welfare state & NHS in some form whoever had been elected.

    The 79-87 government was a government of very radical change – it’s a matter of political perspective whether it was a great government (on balance not IMO) but the changes it made were driven through by the Prime Minister so looked at from the point of view of “did she deliver on her political agenda” you have to give Thatcher plaudits for having done so.

    (There praising Blair AND Thatcher in one go – that should ensure I lose the maximum amount of votes!)

  • David Le Grice 26th Mar '11 - 8:35pm

    If it is to be used as a yardstick then It should apply to private sector public service providers (Serco et al.) who can already out compete the public sector for the best talent with high salaries.

  • To use PM’s pay as a yardstick displays amazing ignorance. The PM is a politician who, together with colleagues prescibes policy usually via parliament. Civil servants and chief execs of Councils implement those policies by managing staff and resources. They are managers. Managers are trained professionals – there are University qualifications for managers. The comparison is like that between apples and oranges.
    I was disappointed to see the comparison in the last Lib Dem manifesto but that document is now irrelevant anyway!

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarSue Sutherland 2nd May - 1:05pm
    I agree with David Allen but with the addition that Tim was elected by the members to provide a clear change from the previous leaders...
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 2nd May - 12:32pm
    Sorry, just some fact correction (and more information) to my first post: It was three Alawite lorry drivers who were executed - often referred to...
  • User AvatarStuart 2nd May - 12:30pm
    If you wish to avoid "poor choices of words", you could make a start by avoiding use of the word "crusade" - a highly inaccurate...
  • User AvatarTim Oliver 2nd May - 11:32am
    "I am as outraged at anyone else at the recent decision to go along with David Cameron and the self-styled ‘International Community’s’ self-serving crusade in...
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 2nd May - 11:25am
    It's entirely possible to be pro helping refugees and have an interventionist foreign policy. Non-intervention has hardly been great for Syria's population being bombed and...
  • User AvatarJennie 2nd May - 10:28am
    Thank you for this, Holly.