Times backs Jeremy Browne’s expenses appeal

As LDV reported yesterday, Lib Dem MP for ultra-marginal Taunton is appealing against Sir Thomas Legg’s request for repayment of almost £18,000 in expenses which Sir Thomas says were against the rules.

Today’s Times carries a leader column backing Jeremy’s appeal – here’s an excerpt:

Take Jeremy Browne, the Liberal Democrat and the first MP to confirm that he would appeal. Upon entering Parliament, Mr Browne removed equity from a London home that he owned before he was elected and used it to buy a property in his constituency. He then claimed against his allowance for the (now larger) mortgage on the London home. Sir Thomas has concluded that he should not have, and wants him to pay back nearly £18,000.

This is arbitrary justice. If Mr Browne had sold his London flat and bought another one, he would have been able to charge the full mortgage to his allowance. It is none of Sir Thomas’s business what the MP did with equity on his flat that was earned when he was not an MP.

Worse, though, it is retrospective justice. Mr Browne was not simply correct in principle to claim the money. He was actually given it. His allowance claim was submitted and it was accepted. To ask for the money back now is bizarre.

Mr Browne should win his appeal. Whether it will be politically advantageous for him if he does so, is another question altogether.

Share:
This entry was posted in News and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/17228 for twitter and emails. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

7 Comments

  • Posted 18th December 2009 at 11:19 am | Permalink

    I think Jeremy has a good case, although it gives me a headache whenever I try to understand it. Why is Legg so obsessed with this mortgage and yet has ignored all these other – much more black and white – instances of flipping?

  • Posted 18th December 2009 at 11:32 am | Permalink

    @James: I don’t think anyone understands the inner working of Sir Thomas’ mind…

  • Malcolm Todd
    Posted 18th December 2009 at 11:41 am | Permalink

    I’m fairly sympathetic, but can’t help asking the obvious question: why didn’t Jeremy Browne just get a mortgage on the property he was buying, rather than the one he already owned? Was there some technical reason that made that impractical?

  • Tabman
    Posted 18th December 2009 at 11:50 am | Permalink

    Malcolm – I suspect it was to do with the size of the depoist and the rate of interest. In order to buy the house in Taunton he needed a deposit and the bigger the better to reduce the interest payments on the remaining equity (there’s a significant drop between 5% and 10% deposit, for example). He then relocated to Taunton and claimed the mortgage interest on the flat as his now second home, whilst paying the mortgage on his house in Taunton himself.

  • Jo
    Posted 18th December 2009 at 12:13 pm | Permalink

    I think you’ll find that’s because Jeremy is a Murdoch a**e licker…

  • whelan
    Posted 18th December 2009 at 5:16 pm | Permalink

    Jeremy Browne has been royally shafted. If I were him I’d want to punch Legg right in the kisser.

  • leekliberal
    Posted 19th December 2009 at 5:27 pm | Permalink

    Message to Jo re her comment – Once again we are being treated to your utter cynicism about us all. If, as I understand, you are no longer a supporter why not sod off and talk to your new chums whoever they are!

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but will not publish personally abusive comments. Our comments policy is published here, please respect it and all readers of the site.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Do you agree to the T&Cs?