<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Topping ourselves</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.libdemvoice.org/topping-ourselves-1203.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/topping-ourselves-1203.html</link>
	<description>Our place to talk - an independent website for supporters of the Liberal Democrat party in the UK.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:30:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan Borrowman</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/topping-ourselves-1203.html#comment-28137</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Borrowman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 16:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/topping-ourselves-1203.html#comment-28137</guid>
		<description>Meral - I don&#039;t think it is being an anorak to try and assess the impact of different issues and presentation of them on readership, especially if you work in my field...

Mark - but they are subjective, and I think the Lib Dem blogger of the year is the best way to score them. The click through counter is good raw data of the sort I like :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meral &#8211; I don&#8217;t think it is being an anorak to try and assess the impact of different issues and presentation of them on readership, especially if you work in my field&#8230;</p>
<p>Mark &#8211; but they are subjective, and I think the Lib Dem blogger of the year is the best way to score them. The click through counter is good raw data of the sort I like <img src='http://www.libdemvoice.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meral Ece</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/topping-ourselves-1203.html#comment-28136</link>
		<dc:creator>Meral Ece</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 15:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/topping-ourselves-1203.html#comment-28136</guid>
		<description>And they say Lib Dems are all anoraks!
Where do they get that from?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And they say Lib Dems are all anoraks!<br />
Where do they get that from?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Valladares</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/topping-ourselves-1203.html#comment-28134</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Valladares</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/topping-ourselves-1203.html#comment-28134</guid>
		<description>Interesting, James doesn&#039;t factor in those who appeared in the &#039;interesting&#039; five, those whose pieces are deemed to be worthy of a wider audience for whatever reason.

It might be interesting to see how these compare. James, over to you...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, James doesn&#8217;t factor in those who appeared in the &#8216;interesting&#8217; five, those whose pieces are deemed to be worthy of a wider audience for whatever reason.</p>
<p>It might be interesting to see how these compare. James, over to you&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan Borrowman</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/topping-ourselves-1203.html#comment-28099</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Borrowman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 22:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/topping-ourselves-1203.html#comment-28099</guid>
		<description>I had started a spreadsheet too..
Using exactly the same criteria.
My interest was to compare for myself those who get hits and those who win awards. Of course the real stars get both!
It is a bit like the campaigner v policy wonk comparisons made pre web. Also of course bloggers get &quot;home&quot; hits from those interested in liberal theory and &quot;away&quot; hits by those not. I find the comparison interesting in it&#039;s contrasts with paper communcation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had started a spreadsheet too..<br />
Using exactly the same criteria.<br />
My interest was to compare for myself those who get hits and those who win awards. Of course the real stars get both!<br />
It is a bit like the campaigner v policy wonk comparisons made pre web. Also of course bloggers get &#8220;home&#8221; hits from those interested in liberal theory and &#8220;away&#8221; hits by those not. I find the comparison interesting in it&#8217;s contrasts with paper communcation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

