A Tory peer referred to the police over expenses says it is part of a campaign of “attacks and innuendo” by an MP. Lord Hanningfield claimed the unnamed MP was determined to “blacken my name” over education policy in Essex, where the peer is council leader.
The frontbencher claimed £99,970 over seven years for the cost of staying in London, despite living 40 miles away.
Lib Dem MP Bob Russell said he believed the peer was referring to him but added he was only interested in the facts. … Colchester MP Bob Russell, who raised Lord Hanningfield’s claims in the House of Commons on 21 June, did not confirm that he had made the complaint to police. But he said: “I have drawn to the attention of various authorities matters which I think are of concern which need looking at.”
Asked if he was attempting to smear the peer, he said: “He’s entitled to say what he wants. My job is to unearth the facts as I understand them and present them to the appropriate bodies to look at.”
Subscribe
-
Follow @LibDemVoice on Twitter
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
-
11 Liberal Democrat MPs vote for registrars to be exempt from marrying same sex couples
-
The Sun story about Chris Huhne that was a total invention (and which the other papers happily copied)
-
How Liberal Democrat MPs voted on same sex marriage amendments
-
Opinion: Why Lib Dems should support the Referendum on the EU – and let’s have it before 2015
-
Same sex Marriage: another Liberal Democrat victory
Search
Op-eds
-
The Independent View: An invitation to ORGCon 2013: the UK’s leading digital rights conference (Peter Bradwell)
-
Baroness Judith Jolly writes: new Social Care Bill focuses on people not systems (Judith Jolly)
-
Opinion polls yadda yadda. OR “Does Nate Silver mean nothing to you? Did he write in vain?” (Stephen Tall)
-
Mike Crockart MP writes… Reducing reoffending and cutting crime (Michael Crockart MP)
-
Opinion: Lib Dem MPs: Vote for equality, human rights and love today (Adrian Trett)
-
Failure at the top of Medway Council Cabinet
-
A week in the life of a councillor - a very personal view
-
Why is a Tory Chancellor skewering the middle class?
-
Wordless Wednesday
-
20mph Average Speed Cameras
-
Subsetting (Chinese) Fonts
-
The new bin tax in Sefton - Yes, paying to have a green bin is another form of a Council tax rise but via the back door!
-
West End Community and Sports Hub - Pavilion progress
-
Additional bus service to assist part of the West End
-
A Reticent Wagnerian
Recent Comments
Mike C 22nd May - 10:18am
Rightly so and long overdue. Apart from the morality aspect,, if our government were to treat WOGS (foreigners Working On Government Service) as expendable and...Richard Boyd 22nd May - 10:03am
Perhaps I am missing a point,, that UKIP has perhaps seen. They needed a good % at the County elections ( feeding off the national...David Evans 22nd May - 9:59am
I think at this moment of near triumph, as liberals, we all need to consider why it is that some zealots want to disown people...Frank H Little 22nd May - 9:36am
Joe, an in-out referendum would have been an opportunity to deflate the anti-EU campaign. I am convinced that only a small minority of those able...Giles Goodall 22nd May - 9:17am
@Stuart: I don't think you can doubt the fact that Lib Dems have set the pace on this issue, as Dave says, and that's something...
Wed 22nd May 2013
Sun 26th May 2013
Tue 28th May 2013
19:30
Wed 29th May 2013
Thu 30th May 2013
Fri 31st May 2013
14:30
Sat 1st Jun 2013
09:30
10:00
Mon 3rd Jun 2013
Thu 6th Jun 2013
18:00
Fri 7th Jun 2013
Sat 8th Jun 2013
10:00
Sun 9th Jun 2013
Thu 13th Jun 2013
Sat 15th Jun 2013
Tue 18th Jun 2013
10 Comments
£100,000 over 7 years does not sound too much for a regular attender. On a rough calc it’s about 500 nights which is about 70 a year.
Hanningfield is entitled to claim overnight stays in London if his main address is in Essex. The only irregularity would be if he was claiming for any nights when he did not stay in London.
Tony Greaves
Looks like a typical bit of LibDem black propaganda to me. The more I learn about the LibDems, the less I like them.
I have great respect for Lord Tony Greaves, but while he might think this is reasonable, for most people its more than their mortgage. He might have been ‘entitled’ by the rules, but was he morally entitled? Many people commute more than 40 miles. I suggest a poll….
The reference was to the police. I was pointing out where any irregularity that could involve the police might possibly lie and saying that the rest was legitimate and therefore would not involve the police.
But of course it is impossible to say anything about parliamentary allowances and expenses without raising hysterical and irrational responses. I should have known better.
Tony Greaves
Terry Gilbert:
“He might have been ‘entitled’ by the rules, but was he morally entitled? Many people commute more than 40 miles. I suggest a poll….”
Was Lord Rennard “morally entitled”, for heaven’s sake?
I note that Lord Hanngingfield claims that his expenses are “peanuts”. Perhaps that comment is worth publicising more widely, given that £100,000 represents more than four times the average annual salary.
Also, according to a local paper he promised to publish his expenses monthly. Has he done so yet? See: http://www.hertsandessexobserver.co.uk/hertsandessexobserver-news-dunmowandstansted/DisplayArticle.asp?ID=421536
London-Chelmsford is a short distance done by commuters everyday.
The Essex taxpayers provides him with a limosine and driver and the national taxpayer puts him up in London. It’s a bit excessive.
Talking about Peers ,has Lord Rennard repaid the £41,000 yet?
First thing the Tories on KCC did after the elections was to award themselves an 8% increase in allowances.
Neither Lord Hanningfield, the Kent Tories or, sadly, Tony Greaves, seem to get it yet.
The question is whether hanningfield is a regular attender or not. I understand that his attendance in the Lords is quite below that of other Tory frontbenchers.