UK electoral law is fragmented, convoluted and causing errors

So writes Toby James:

There has recently been a rise in concerns about the quality of elections in the UK and electoral administrators have commonly been blamed for making administrative errors or not planning properly for elections.

The causes of legal fragmentation and complexity are partly devolution. This has created many overlapping frameworks of electoral law, more frequent elections and more combined elections and the lack of consolidation. But it is also that electoral law needs to be consolidated periodically and this has not been done since the 1980s.

Read his piece in full to find out what is being done about that.

* Mark Pack has written 101 Ways To Win An Election and produces a monthly newsletter about the Liberal Democrats.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Election law.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/30322 for Twitter and emails.

One Comment

  • Having worked with the returning officer at recent Local and General elections as DNO, I became aware of the confusing and convoluted laws. Clearly an electoral law consolidation act is very necessary.

    Personally I would go back to having postal votes only for those who need it, nothing is better than going to the local hall to put your mark on a paper, it also minimises personation and fraud.
    I would also introduce a prize draw for those who do go to vote by putting poll cards into a tombola at the polling station. I would also permit the polling day to become a community day where local organisations could have a display of what they do and get people involved.
    Crucially I would insist on there being only one election on any one day, Local/National/Euro/Referenda are each distinct and different, requiring voters to have different considerations. The extra cost is worth it for the betterment of the democratic process.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarIain Donaldson 21st Oct - 4:36am
    Fortunately the enlightenment of Liberal men on the abilities of women has distinguished precedent. Former Liberal Leader, Herbert Samuel had in his earlier career opposed...
  • User AvatarIain Donaldson 21st Oct - 3:51am
    If devolution on demand is the answer then I dread to ask which numpty thought up the question, let alone what that question might have...
  • User AvatarIain Donaldson 21st Oct - 3:37am
    liberal n adjective 2 (in a political context) favouring individual liberty, free trade, and moderate political and social reform. (Liberal) relating to Liberals or a...
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 21st Oct - 3:08am
    Check out the pictures, race and gender equality in our little co-op, as it was back then. Things were so much better back then. http://www.enactuslancaster.org/national-competition-2014.html
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 21st Oct - 3:03am
    I used to be a director of a gender balanced co-op at university and I've just checked up on it and it is still gender...
  • User AvatarMaria Pretzler 21st Oct - 1:58am
    Good to see another post on this - I have in the past written about the problems with this completely unworkable policy. If they couldn't...