UK electoral law is fragmented, convoluted and causing errors

So writes Toby James:

There has recently been a rise in concerns about the quality of elections in the UK and electoral administrators have commonly been blamed for making administrative errors or not planning properly for elections.

The causes of legal fragmentation and complexity are partly devolution. This has created many overlapping frameworks of electoral law, more frequent elections and more combined elections and the lack of consolidation. But it is also that electoral law needs to be consolidated periodically and this has not been done since the 1980s.

Read his piece in full to find out what is being done about that.

* Mark Pack has written 101 Ways To Win An Election and produces a monthly newsletter about the Liberal Democrats.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Election law.
Advert

One Comment

  • Having worked with the returning officer at recent Local and General elections as DNO, I became aware of the confusing and convoluted laws. Clearly an electoral law consolidation act is very necessary.

    Personally I would go back to having postal votes only for those who need it, nothing is better than going to the local hall to put your mark on a paper, it also minimises personation and fraud.
    I would also introduce a prize draw for those who do go to vote by putting poll cards into a tombola at the polling station. I would also permit the polling day to become a community day where local organisations could have a display of what they do and get people involved.
    Crucially I would insist on there being only one election on any one day, Local/National/Euro/Referenda are each distinct and different, requiring voters to have different considerations. The extra cost is worth it for the betterment of the democratic process.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMark Goodrich 30th Jun - 1:57am
    I agree wholeheatedly with the article. It is not right to say that it denies the benefits of free movement. It recognises them but also...
  • User AvatarMark Goodrich 30th Jun - 1:45am
    I have been posing the question on Twitter (@markygoodrich) and trying to find information on what the advantages of the Norway option are. As far...
  • User AvatarCllr Mark Wright 30th Jun - 12:35am
    Some very good posts above by Matthew Huntbach (apart from the Clegg bashing!)
  • User AvatarHugh 29th Jun - 11:39pm
    Jayne, like like the drift of your article, but I do not think a single person voted Leave because of the recent Housing or Planning...
  • User AvatarKevin colwill 29th Jun - 11:34pm
    "And the people chose FPTP over a fairer system – that’s democracy" but it's not set in stone like some unchanging law of physics. One...
  • User AvatarRoland 29th Jun - 11:23pm
    I think you’ll find that the virtually all the 17 million people who voted to leave the EU actually voted to leave the EU. Don't...