UNISON still hasn’t properly completed its general election expense return

We reported back in December how UNISON was facing a fine for breaking election law. The trade union had completely failed to submit details of their general election expenditure within the legal deadline.

UNISON has now submitted its spending declaration several months late, but in a quirky twist of the law has not yet been fined by the Electoral Commission – because its return is still missing the signature of the ‘responsible person’. Assuming UNISON manage to get the piece of paper finally signed before 5 May (six months after the 5 November deadline), the fine required by law is £1,000.

Given how often UNISON calls for employers to stick to the letter of the law, its own failure to obey the law is not exactly the union’s finest hour.

UPDATE: In the end, Unison did meet the 5 May date and so was fined £1,000.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Election law.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMichael BG 28th Feb - 1:54am
    We had a chance to call for and build alliances to reform the EU into a pro-people institution rather than a pro-business or pro-globalisation institution....
  • User AvatarKatharine Pindar 28th Feb - 1:38am
    Thanks, Ed Thornley, for your enthusiasm for our constituency! It's good to read the differing viewpoints above, and, thanks to Peter Watson, the detailed voter...
  • User AvatarConor McGovern 28th Feb - 1:18am
    David Evans, I agree. We must never, ever again settle for being a small-c conservative party.
  • User AvatarKatharine Pindar 28th Feb - 1:02am
    Peter and Mike, I love the way you both keep on demanding detailed answers to what Lib Dems offer practically, to fulfill our Preamble ideals...
  • User AvatarDavid Evans 28th Feb - 12:33am
    Conor, We had done all that you suggest for over forty years, building our party up from nearly nothing to get up to 57 MPs...
  • User AvatarPeter Watson 27th Feb - 11:10pm
    "in Copeland our vote has snuck above ten percent only twice; in 2005 and 2010" According to the Wikipedia page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copeland_(UK_Parliament_constituency): 2001 10.7% 1983 15.9%...