UNISON to be fined for failing to declare election expenditure

Yesterday the Electoral Commission published information about the campaign spending by UK political parties during the 2010 general election. Buried near the end of the release was this news:

Two third parties – ‘UNISON – The Public Service Union’ and ‘Searchlight Information Services Ltd’ – failed to submit their spending return on time. The Commission has issued Searchlight Information Services with a fine. The Commission will issue UNISON – The Public Service Union with a fine when they submit their return.

The overall figures showed spending down from its heights of 2005, with 43 parties spending just under £32m for 2010 compared with a total of just over £42m for 2005. The total amount of election-related expenditure was significantly higher as these totals exclude sums declared on individual candidate expense returns and also exclude certain exempt categories, including various party staff salaries.*

The Liberal Democrat figure was £4,787,595, up from £4,324,574 in 2005.

* The introduction of these rules for the 2001 election campaign caused one of my favourite exchanges with the Electoral Commission during my time working for the party, which went something like this: ‘Just to check I’ve understood both the law and your guidance correctly – we have a member of staff here whose job title is General Election Planning Manager. However, their salary does not count towards the General Election expense limit, is that right?’ ‘Yes.’

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Election law and News.
Advert

4 Comments

  • Agreed Geoffrey – wonderful voluntary organisations. If only the City had been a quarter as regulated as these bodies.

  • Whatever the rights and wrongs, it is worth knowing – I will be sending a donation to Searchlight. Bryan any city firm acting as a third party in the GE would have been equally regulated.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User Avatarjedibeeftrix 29th Aug - 7:45am
    This: "As a liberal, I’d happily accept whatever our core vote is – probably something between 8% and 20% – under PR. We’d probably never...
  • User Avatarpetermartin2001 29th Aug - 7:18am
    I suppose I should read the book, before passing judgement, but I think we do already know what "the Alternative" is. I'd say it will...
  • User AvatarRightsaidfredfan 29th Aug - 7:02am
    "So our main priority needs to be PR" Why? It's not the public's main priority. Could it be because PR is in the lib dems...
  • User AvatarRightsaidfredfan 29th Aug - 5:23am
    @paul barker "when The Labour Split does come we have a real prospect of becoming Englands 2nd Party, ahead of both Labours." UKIP would be...
  • User AvatarLorenzo Cherin 29th Aug - 4:07am
    Colin, you do not understand ,perhaps , surely , the feelings expressed on here on the previous or any thread about a progressive alliance ,...
  • User AvatarStevan Rose 29th Aug - 2:41am
    "This woman has become a candidate – against all of the odds and without family connections. " What has that got to do with H...