UNISON to be fined for failing to declare election expenditure

Yesterday the Electoral Commission published information about the campaign spending by UK political parties during the 2010 general election. Buried near the end of the release was this news:

Two third parties – ‘UNISON – The Public Service Union’ and ‘Searchlight Information Services Ltd’ – failed to submit their spending return on time. The Commission has issued Searchlight Information Services with a fine. The Commission will issue UNISON – The Public Service Union with a fine when they submit their return.

The overall figures showed spending down from its heights of 2005, with 43 parties spending just under £32m for 2010 compared with a total of just over £42m for 2005. The total amount of election-related expenditure was significantly higher as these totals exclude sums declared on individual candidate expense returns and also exclude certain exempt categories, including various party staff salaries.*

The Liberal Democrat figure was £4,787,595, up from £4,324,574 in 2005.

* The introduction of these rules for the 2001 election campaign caused one of my favourite exchanges with the Electoral Commission during my time working for the party, which went something like this: ‘Just to check I’ve understood both the law and your guidance correctly – we have a member of staff here whose job title is General Election Planning Manager. However, their salary does not count towards the General Election expense limit, is that right?’ ‘Yes.’

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Election law and News.
Advert

4 Comments

  • Agreed Geoffrey – wonderful voluntary organisations. If only the City had been a quarter as regulated as these bodies.

  • Whatever the rights and wrongs, it is worth knowing – I will be sending a donation to Searchlight. Bryan any city firm acting as a third party in the GE would have been equally regulated.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarKatharine Pindar 22nd Jan - 1:19am
    No Lib Dem should be making help for Stoke Central any more of a priority than Copeland. In both, we will climb from very small...
  • User AvatarRBH 22nd Jan - 1:13am
    Only Scottish Lib Dems can decide how they feel about independence and another referendum. As an Englishman, it'll be one of the saddest days of...
  • User AvatarGlenn 22nd Jan - 1:10am
    Angrysteve. You've just done it now. Obviously, the scientific method stay the same but data changes the nature of the what is seen as a...
  • User AvatarLorenzo Cherin 22nd Jan - 12:42am
    Stuart Thank you for your comment , which I find to be just the sort of encouragement needed for putting real effort into being politically...
  • User AvatarAdam Cain 22nd Jan - 12:38am
    Well, David Bell, the reason LDs keep entering democratic votes is because we keep winning them. We have this weird idea that the electorate are...
  • User Avatarmalc 21st Jan - 11:51pm
    Both the up coming by-elections should be interesting, but Stoke Central looks very close with all 4 major parties having a chance. If the campaign...