UNISON to be fined for failing to declare election expenditure

Yesterday the Electoral Commission published information about the campaign spending by UK political parties during the 2010 general election. Buried near the end of the release was this news:

Two third parties – ‘UNISON – The Public Service Union’ and ‘Searchlight Information Services Ltd’ – failed to submit their spending return on time. The Commission has issued Searchlight Information Services with a fine. The Commission will issue UNISON – The Public Service Union with a fine when they submit their return.

The overall figures showed spending down from its heights of 2005, with 43 parties spending just under £32m for 2010 compared with a total of just over £42m for 2005. The total amount of election-related expenditure was significantly higher as these totals exclude sums declared on individual candidate expense returns and also exclude certain exempt categories, including various party staff salaries.*

The Liberal Democrat figure was £4,787,595, up from £4,324,574 in 2005.

* The introduction of these rules for the 2001 election campaign caused one of my favourite exchanges with the Electoral Commission during my time working for the party, which went something like this: ‘Just to check I’ve understood both the law and your guidance correctly – we have a member of staff here whose job title is General Election Planning Manager. However, their salary does not count towards the General Election expense limit, is that right?’ ‘Yes.’

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Election law and News.
Advert

4 Comments

  • Agreed Geoffrey – wonderful voluntary organisations. If only the City had been a quarter as regulated as these bodies.

  • Whatever the rights and wrongs, it is worth knowing – I will be sending a donation to Searchlight. Bryan any city firm acting as a third party in the GE would have been equally regulated.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPhilip 13th Feb - 8:52pm
    Hello Sesenco - thank you for posting - which other points here do you think are incorrect and why: http://www.ukip.org/busting_the_eu_myths?
  • User AvatarSesenco 13th Feb - 8:34pm
    It might help if we actually told people the truth. Britain leaving the EU would lead to the ultimate collapse of the rest of the...
  • User AvatarJohn Marriott 13th Feb - 8:28pm
    We need to finish the job start by Lord Redcliffe Maude's committee in 1969, which was continued by the Banham Commission in the early 1990s...
  • User AvatarRsf7 13th Feb - 8:26pm
    @a social liberal. Cannabis of any type has never been proven to cause mental illness, there is a slight correlation, but correlation is not causation,...
  • User AvatarChris_sh 13th Feb - 8:26pm
    @Peter " So what hope have they for knowing what the world economy will look like in the next twenty years?" Amen to that :-D
  • User AvatarRsf7 13th Feb - 8:23pm
    @eddie The lib dems don't just have opposing views though, they have no consistent ideology at all. I have also discovered that there is a...