Wanted: Your views on slavery

“Slavery?” I hear you cry. “In this day and age?”

Sadly, slavery is still very much with us. And it’s not a problem found only in far away countries. It’s happening right here, right now, in Britain.

The extent of the problem and proposed remedies were set out in the Report of the Modern Slavery Bill Evidence Review, chaired by Frank Field MP and published on 16th December 2013.

The government is now proposing new legislation to tackle the problem. As part of the process of preparing this legislation, a Joint Committee on the Draft Modern Slavery Bill has been established, of which I am a member. The Bill was published last December and the committee’s role is pre-legislative scrutiny, to consider and report on the draft Bill. We will take written and oral evidence and make recommendations in a report to both houses of parliament this April, which will feed into the final bill that will be placed before parliament.

The potential value of this Bill is that it provides the opportunity for legislative consolidation to encapsulate all modern slavery issues, so that the legislative source of prevention and prosecution of offenders and protection of victims can be available to those who need to implement the legislation in a single source.

Although the draft Bill is a welcome step forward, however, it has many shortcomings. I am particularly concerned about the failure to deal adequately with the need to protect child victims of trafficking. It’s not just that 40% of victims of trafficking are children but also that child exploitation has specific characteristics and special needs.

Other shortcomings of the Bill include:

  • It merely replicates or brings together existing legislation rather than create a consolidated offence.
  • It fails to distinguish adequately between ‘modern day slavery’ and ‘trafficking’, which are related but distinct problems.
  • It does not distinguish adequately between victims of trafficking and offenders of immigration laws, leaving the former open to prosecution instead of protection.
  • It does not protect victims of trafficking from being prosecuted for crimes they have been forced to commit by their exploiters.

To help improve the draft Bill, I would like to hear your views. I can then feed these into the scrutiny process and help shape the Bill as it appears in its revised format. Given the April deadline, the committee is working to a short timescale, so the sooner you can send your views the better. Parliament’s formal call for evidence expired on 10th February but you can nevertheless feed your ideas to me at [email protected].

* Dee Doocey became a Liberal Democrat peer in December 2010. She was formerly a member of Richmond Borough Council, the London Assembly and the Metropolitan Police Authority.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

3 Comments

  • What definition of trafficking does it use? I work in an office building in Eastern Europe (EU) where there are job agencies offering to “traffic” people to the UK to work in factories, as plumbers etc.

  • Richard Underhill 7th Jan '17 - 9:32pm

    I have read Wellington by Christopher Hibbert. Tthe First Duke was made Ambassador to Paris, to the court of Louis XV111. At the time we were essentially an occupying power. The UK Prime Minister, Lord Liverpool, asked that the French should abolish slavery, as the UK had done in 1807. Our motives were treated with suspicion for commercial reasons. Eventually a deal was done, postponement for 5 years. During that time Napoleon Bonaparte escaped.
    A request that Portugal should be asked to abolish slavery was refused by the Duke with scorn.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarLaurence Cox 24th Feb - 12:06pm
    I don't think that anyone should be displeased with the results in Stoke and Copeland. Both constituencies polled around 4% for the Lib Dems in...
  • User AvatarMike S 24th Feb - 12:01pm
    Apologies - posted on the wrong thread - more relevant here: If you want to encourage more people to engage with politics, than you have...
  • User AvatarJohn Barrett 24th Feb - 11:56am
    @Paul Holmes "Where I would disagree is over the point about a ‘second referendum’." Hi Paul, the problem with another referendum on the outcome of...
  • User AvatarLaurence Cox 24th Feb - 11:45am
    I was nodding in agreement with this, until I reached the last paragraph. Has Tom Arms already forgotten the vicious wars that followed the break-up...
  • User AvatarATF 24th Feb - 11:35am
    @Bill le Breton Sounds like a very good idea to me - especially when we consider the County Councils are just round the corner. Our...
  • User AvatarJenny Barnes 24th Feb - 11:34am
    tory +Ukip vote stayed the same, but UKIP vote moved to tories labour +libdem vote ditto but labour vote moved to lib dem. Tories win.