What do the academics say? Being local works

Academic cap and gown - Some rights reserved by NoDivisionWelcome to the latest in our occasional series highlighting interesting findings from academic research. Today – it’s the effect of being local on a candidate’s election chances, courtesy of an article in Political Geography [£]:

In this paper, we [analyse] the British General Election of 2010 and the British Election Survey, together with geographical data from Ordnance Survey and Royal Mail, to test the hypothesis that candidate distance matters in voters’ choice of candidate. Using a conditional logit model, we find that the distance between voter and candidates from the three main parties (Conservative, Labour and Liberal Democrat) matters in English constituencies, even when controlling for strong predictors of vote choice, such as party feeling and incumbency advantage.

Although it’s not tested for, I suspect ‘being local’ in this case means a mix of two factors: the public like local candidates (they really like local candidates – see this earlier research) and also the closer a candidate lives, the better placed they usually are to lead, organise and take part in campaigning in the constituency.

You can read the other posts in our What do the academics say? series here.

* Mark Pack has written 101 Ways To Win An Election and produces a monthly newsletter about the Liberal Democrats.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in What do the academics say?.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/32772 for Twitter and emails.

4 Comments

  • I presume there will shortly be a research paper declaring tha the yolk is definitely on the inside of each egg?

    Liberal Democrats have known this fact for years. Which is why short-listers often effectively determine who will be the parliamentary candidate in a winnable constituency while trying to be ‘politically correct’.

  • Richard Dean 25th Jan '13 - 2:45am

    Thinking outside the box a bit, or indeed the egg, isn’t it time that Libdems came out of their comfort zone and embraced a modern reality in which yokes have the strategic and tactical freedoms to be more or less anywhere, and indeed often prefer to explore where they haven’t been before? :-)

  • Doesn’t stop hee-hawing donkeys and trumpeting elephants being parachuted into safe seats because they wear the correct rosette though, and it won’t stop ambitious party honchos continuing to execute coups over the public in this way, does it?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMatGB 1st Aug - 12:10am
    Jackie, 19 Tories, 6 LibDems (including the neutral mayor who'll vote with the cabniet to break ties by tradition), 25 Labour and one Independent. One...
  • User AvatarJayne Mansfield 1st Aug - 12:08am
    @Steve, So where are all the black managers then? There have been so many excellent. Black players who have served their club or their country...
  • User AvatarJames Brough 31st Jul - 11:59pm
    Richard, as the page I linked to said, the party was known as the Liberals at that point. But, you know what? I suspect you...
  • User AvatarJayne Mansfield 31st Jul - 11:58pm
    Happy birthday Caron. I hope that you didn't stuff yourself at the celebratory meal and end up feeling sick as a parrot.
  • User AvatarRichard Dean 31st Jul - 11:41pm
    @James Brough. Time travel is here! The LIberal Democrats were formed 13 years after you say they started working on the policy! At that time,...
  • User AvatarFrank Bowles 31st Jul - 11:35pm
    Despite all her "why aren't there more women in the cabinet" she doesn't click think that it could be Dad not Mum who takes Andrew...