<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What do you think of Lib Dem News?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.libdemvoice.org/what-do-you-think-of-lib-dem-news-1482.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/what-do-you-think-of-lib-dem-news-1482.html</link>
	<description>Our place to talk - an independent website for supporters of the Liberal Democrat party in the UK.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:46:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Sample</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/what-do-you-think-of-lib-dem-news-1482.html#comment-121207</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Sample</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 12:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/what-do-you-think-of-lib-dem-news-1482.html#comment-121207</guid>
		<description>Interesting to read this, as a past LDN Editor. The reference to the &quot;Bring God back into politics&quot; episode is an interesting one. I was working under the late great Charles Stainsby at the time and we decided that there was a lack of &quot;spice&quot; and &quot;debate&quot; in the paper. We detected that readers were getting bored with the same old rubbish week in, week out (through the letters page). We both agreed that we needed to start a bush fire and get a debate going that would light up the paper and provide some good, free copy. The options for ruining a good dinner party in those days was to discuss sex, religion or politics - so I suggested a commentary on the late Bishop of Durham&#039;s controversial comments in his &quot;Hibbert Lecture&quot;. The result was absolutely brilliant - a perfect firestorm, with motions to Party Council angry Young Liberals getting up and making perfect idiots of themselves, a flood of letters to the paper. The Liberal Christian Forum got a boost and subscriptions to LN went up almost overnight. The humanists were similarly delighted - because it gave them a platform too. Sometimes Editors have to start bushfires. If they can&#039;t then life becomes very boring indeed. That&#039;s one of the reasons Charles invited Tony Greaves to contribute a weekly column - a free bonus which I inherited. Tony&#039;s column&#039;s were ALWAYS on time, crisply written (dictated actually) and controversial. He became something of hate figure among some readers - but was always read. After I left the Editor&#039;s Chair the column was divided up between various big wigs, Hopelessly predictable, sycophantic and boring. The back page column has been a shadow ever since. Bring back Tony Greaves!

Paul Sample
49 (and three quarters)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting to read this, as a past LDN Editor. The reference to the &#8220;Bring God back into politics&#8221; episode is an interesting one. I was working under the late great Charles Stainsby at the time and we decided that there was a lack of &#8220;spice&#8221; and &#8220;debate&#8221; in the paper. We detected that readers were getting bored with the same old rubbish week in, week out (through the letters page). We both agreed that we needed to start a bush fire and get a debate going that would light up the paper and provide some good, free copy. The options for ruining a good dinner party in those days was to discuss sex, religion or politics &#8211; so I suggested a commentary on the late Bishop of Durham&#8217;s controversial comments in his &#8220;Hibbert Lecture&#8221;. The result was absolutely brilliant &#8211; a perfect firestorm, with motions to Party Council angry Young Liberals getting up and making perfect idiots of themselves, a flood of letters to the paper. The Liberal Christian Forum got a boost and subscriptions to LN went up almost overnight. The humanists were similarly delighted &#8211; because it gave them a platform too. Sometimes Editors have to start bushfires. If they can&#8217;t then life becomes very boring indeed. That&#8217;s one of the reasons Charles invited Tony Greaves to contribute a weekly column &#8211; a free bonus which I inherited. Tony&#8217;s column&#8217;s were ALWAYS on time, crisply written (dictated actually) and controversial. He became something of hate figure among some readers &#8211; but was always read. After I left the Editor&#8217;s Chair the column was divided up between various big wigs, Hopelessly predictable, sycophantic and boring. The back page column has been a shadow ever since. Bring back Tony Greaves!</p>
<p>Paul Sample<br />
49 (and three quarters)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy Kitcher</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/what-do-you-think-of-lib-dem-news-1482.html#comment-31382</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Kitcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/what-do-you-think-of-lib-dem-news-1482.html#comment-31382</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have my own subscription, but when I get a chance to read someone else&#039;s copies I do love the &#039;People&#039; column. It&#039;s the best thing in LDN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have my own subscription, but when I get a chance to read someone else&#8217;s copies I do love the &#8216;People&#8217; column. It&#8217;s the best thing in LDN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/what-do-you-think-of-lib-dem-news-1482.html#comment-31369</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/what-do-you-think-of-lib-dem-news-1482.html#comment-31369</guid>
		<description>I have to say I disagree with Mr Greaves as I think the late great Mike Harskin did a great job of editing Lib Dem news as did Paul Sample

I hope Mr Greaves will on reflection agree

That said a lot of its purpose for me is served by web sites with election results however the back page is good</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say I disagree with Mr Greaves as I think the late great Mike Harskin did a great job of editing Lib Dem news as did Paul Sample</p>
<p>I hope Mr Greaves will on reflection agree</p>
<p>That said a lot of its purpose for me is served by web sites with election results however the back page is good</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hywel Morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/what-do-you-think-of-lib-dem-news-1482.html#comment-31311</link>
		<dc:creator>Hywel Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/what-do-you-think-of-lib-dem-news-1482.html#comment-31311</guid>
		<description>Chris you say that LDN &quot;appears each week, without cost to the party&quot;

Does that take into account the money raised from the obligation local parties are under to pay for PPC adverts in Lib Dem News. That revenue stream is really money that is circulating around the party rather than money coming in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris you say that LDN &#8220;appears each week, without cost to the party&#8221;</p>
<p>Does that take into account the money raised from the obligation local parties are under to pay for PPC adverts in Lib Dem News. That revenue stream is really money that is circulating around the party rather than money coming in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mindstar</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/what-do-you-think-of-lib-dem-news-1482.html#comment-31308</link>
		<dc:creator>mindstar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/what-do-you-think-of-lib-dem-news-1482.html#comment-31308</guid>
		<description>Well said John Pugh! Liberal Democrat News is Pravda-ish in its slavish devotion to the Party beyond all truth and its refusal to admit problems and mistakes. A lot like some of the posts on this blog actually. I&#039;m talking about you, Stephen Tall!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said John Pugh! Liberal Democrat News is Pravda-ish in its slavish devotion to the Party beyond all truth and its refusal to admit problems and mistakes. A lot like some of the posts on this blog actually. I&#8217;m talking about you, Stephen Tall!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warrior</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/what-do-you-think-of-lib-dem-news-1482.html#comment-31306</link>
		<dc:creator>Warrior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/what-do-you-think-of-lib-dem-news-1482.html#comment-31306</guid>
		<description>It needs updating. There is enough opinion and willingness within the party to do it so why not start with a nationwide focus on it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It needs updating. There is enough opinion and willingness within the party to do it so why not start with a nationwide focus on it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Abbott</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/what-do-you-think-of-lib-dem-news-1482.html#comment-31303</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Abbott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 13:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/what-do-you-think-of-lib-dem-news-1482.html#comment-31303</guid>
		<description>John Pugh is a little unfair to Lib Dem News (LDN). As others have pointed out he is simply negative in his remarks and makes no constructive suggestions.

I agree we need to improve on the cartoons and a crossword would be nice.

More seriously I have complained to the editor in the past that the party covers too much from the south of England and not enough from the north. That probably reflects the balance of stories sent in. In which case have those of us, who do complain sent anything in lately. I have and on balance I think a fair amount has got in. Probably about 10%. So you just have to keep sending stuff in.

I have totally failed to get the paper to take an interest in our campaign for Yorkshire, which gets lots of coverage locally. I also failed to persuade LDN to report the fact that three Labour Councillors defected to us in the Borough Redcar &amp; Cleveland two years ago.

I love the &#039;People&#039; column. I am bored with the Parliamentary reports but accept we have to have them but they could be shorter. I also enjoy reading some of the columnists but efforts should be made to persuade Tony Greaves to return, at least then we would get a view from the north.

In conclusion LDN is unique in that the other two don&#039;t have one. We must be grateful for that. Don&#039;t blame the staff. If you think you can improve it get your pen out and send the stuff in. If it is newsworthy it should get in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Pugh is a little unfair to Lib Dem News (LDN). As others have pointed out he is simply negative in his remarks and makes no constructive suggestions.</p>
<p>I agree we need to improve on the cartoons and a crossword would be nice.</p>
<p>More seriously I have complained to the editor in the past that the party covers too much from the south of England and not enough from the north. That probably reflects the balance of stories sent in. In which case have those of us, who do complain sent anything in lately. I have and on balance I think a fair amount has got in. Probably about 10%. So you just have to keep sending stuff in.</p>
<p>I have totally failed to get the paper to take an interest in our campaign for Yorkshire, which gets lots of coverage locally. I also failed to persuade LDN to report the fact that three Labour Councillors defected to us in the Borough Redcar &amp; Cleveland two years ago.</p>
<p>I love the &#8216;People&#8217; column. I am bored with the Parliamentary reports but accept we have to have them but they could be shorter. I also enjoy reading some of the columnists but efforts should be made to persuade Tony Greaves to return, at least then we would get a view from the north.</p>
<p>In conclusion LDN is unique in that the other two don&#8217;t have one. We must be grateful for that. Don&#8217;t blame the staff. If you think you can improve it get your pen out and send the stuff in. If it is newsworthy it should get in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Greaves</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/what-do-you-think-of-lib-dem-news-1482.html#comment-31302</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Greaves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 13:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/what-do-you-think-of-lib-dem-news-1482.html#comment-31302</guid>
		<description>I suppose with that intro I should comment. I have very clear ideas on what LD News should do and have put them forward at regular intervals (I suppose about 8-yearly!) over the past 35 years but no-one agrees with me and so...and for me it&#039;s too late to bother any more.

I do not blame the staff who do what they are employed to do.

I gave up writing a column on the back page because I was fed up of being in the same slot as a load of boring House Magazine type stuff (which is what is in most of the rest of the paper nowadays). After Conrad died there was nothing else.

The only person who made a really worthwhile job of Liberal News or LD News was the late great Charles Stainsby and it killed him.

Tony Greaves

PS Ask about the circulation and then ask is it worth the candle?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose with that intro I should comment. I have very clear ideas on what LD News should do and have put them forward at regular intervals (I suppose about 8-yearly!) over the past 35 years but no-one agrees with me and so&#8230;and for me it&#8217;s too late to bother any more.</p>
<p>I do not blame the staff who do what they are employed to do.</p>
<p>I gave up writing a column on the back page because I was fed up of being in the same slot as a load of boring House Magazine type stuff (which is what is in most of the rest of the paper nowadays). After Conrad died there was nothing else.</p>
<p>The only person who made a really worthwhile job of Liberal News or LD News was the late great Charles Stainsby and it killed him.</p>
<p>Tony Greaves</p>
<p>PS Ask about the circulation and then ask is it worth the candle?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manfarang</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/what-do-you-think-of-lib-dem-news-1482.html#comment-31298</link>
		<dc:creator>Manfarang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 12:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/what-do-you-think-of-lib-dem-news-1482.html#comment-31298</guid>
		<description>LDN reaches parts that other parties cannot reach!What other publication could one read on a rainy afternoon in Lak Song- the Manchester Guardian Weekly?
Mr Pugh I would be more than happy to return to Old Blighty and refound The News Chronicle, I think that is what you are truely getting at-a national daily Liberal newspaper!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LDN reaches parts that other parties cannot reach!What other publication could one read on a rainy afternoon in Lak Song- the Manchester Guardian Weekly?<br />
Mr Pugh I would be more than happy to return to Old Blighty and refound The News Chronicle, I think that is what you are truely getting at-a national daily Liberal newspaper!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angus Huck</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/what-do-you-think-of-lib-dem-news-1482.html#comment-31296</link>
		<dc:creator>Angus Huck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 12:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/what-do-you-think-of-lib-dem-news-1482.html#comment-31296</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t set eyes on LDN for ages, so have difficulty commenting.

But I do agree that it is a throroughly good thing for the party to publish a weekly source of accurate information in print format.

If that amounts to Pravda, then so be it.

When partiality crept into LDN the results were not encouraging.

Anyone recall the constant sniping against the SDP back in the 1980s?

Or Paul Sample and his infamous exhortation to bring God back into politics? (Laurence Boyce would have loved that one!)

The &quot;Social Democrat&quot;, the SDP equivalent, was indeed called Pravda, and rightly so. Its editor, the truly dreadful Val Taylor, was a 3rd rate journalist, an intensely partisan Owenite and avowed enemy of all things Liberal. Anyone vaguely critical of Owen got frozen out fast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t set eyes on LDN for ages, so have difficulty commenting.</p>
<p>But I do agree that it is a throroughly good thing for the party to publish a weekly source of accurate information in print format.</p>
<p>If that amounts to Pravda, then so be it.</p>
<p>When partiality crept into LDN the results were not encouraging.</p>
<p>Anyone recall the constant sniping against the SDP back in the 1980s?</p>
<p>Or Paul Sample and his infamous exhortation to bring God back into politics? (Laurence Boyce would have loved that one!)</p>
<p>The &#8220;Social Democrat&#8221;, the SDP equivalent, was indeed called Pravda, and rightly so. Its editor, the truly dreadful Val Taylor, was a 3rd rate journalist, an intensely partisan Owenite and avowed enemy of all things Liberal. Anyone vaguely critical of Owen got frozen out fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan Borrowman</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/what-do-you-think-of-lib-dem-news-1482.html#comment-31295</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Borrowman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 12:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/what-do-you-think-of-lib-dem-news-1482.html#comment-31295</guid>
		<description>I should add that after years of stealing other peoples, I have just taken out a subscription to Liberator!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should add that after years of stealing other peoples, I have just taken out a subscription to Liberator!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheltenham Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/what-do-you-think-of-lib-dem-news-1482.html#comment-31294</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheltenham Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 12:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/what-do-you-think-of-lib-dem-news-1482.html#comment-31294</guid>
		<description>Ah ha

More evidence that Iain Dale is
about to defect.

Because he agrees with our values of course (and not because he can&#039;t find a safe seat)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah ha</p>
<p>More evidence that Iain Dale is<br />
about to defect.</p>
<p>Because he agrees with our values of course (and not because he can&#8217;t find a safe seat)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iain dale</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/what-do-you-think-of-lib-dem-news-1482.html#comment-31291</link>
		<dc:creator>iain dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/what-do-you-think-of-lib-dem-news-1482.html#comment-31291</guid>
		<description>Chris Rennard is right. LDN may be a bit Pravda like but so what? It means I very rarely write about a story in it on my blog, so they must be getting something right! It is a disgrace that the Conservative and Labour parties have nothing similar to keep their members in touch with what they are doing. I have a subscription and I have no intention of letting it lapse!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Rennard is right. LDN may be a bit Pravda like but so what? It means I very rarely write about a story in it on my blog, so they must be getting something right! It is a disgrace that the Conservative and Labour parties have nothing similar to keep their members in touch with what they are doing. I have a subscription and I have no intention of letting it lapse!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob F</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/what-do-you-think-of-lib-dem-news-1482.html#comment-31290</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/what-do-you-think-of-lib-dem-news-1482.html#comment-31290</guid>
		<description>LD News is not quite Pravda - they do publicise critical letters from time to time - and I was very grateful that they carried a short piece advertising the creation of Lib Dem Voice when it was set up last year. &#039;Pravda&#039; would not have done that. I&#039;ve always found Deirdre and her team to be extremely helpful and pleasant.  

That said, I had a subscription for a year and I have just let it lapse - it had got to the point where I was only reading &#039;People!&#039;  Definitely more imagination needed from the parliamentary contributors...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LD News is not quite Pravda &#8211; they do publicise critical letters from time to time &#8211; and I was very grateful that they carried a short piece advertising the creation of Lib Dem Voice when it was set up last year. &#8216;Pravda&#8217; would not have done that. I&#8217;ve always found Deirdre and her team to be extremely helpful and pleasant.  </p>
<p>That said, I had a subscription for a year and I have just let it lapse &#8211; it had got to the point where I was only reading &#8216;People!&#8217;  Definitely more imagination needed from the parliamentary contributors&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Land</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/what-do-you-think-of-lib-dem-news-1482.html#comment-31288</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Land</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/what-do-you-think-of-lib-dem-news-1482.html#comment-31288</guid>
		<description>Duncan, as I don&#039;t always agree with you, I do this with a certain amount of caution, because this time I do!

The other parties probably envy the fact that we as a party have so many ways to communicate with each other; through LD News, effective Internet communication, Grassroots Campaigner, Liberator, etc. After all the Tories only have the Daily Mail.
And, Duncan, of course you are right that a printed paper, however short the deadlines cannot match the speed of the Internet. However, it does have certain advantages. The Internet is all very well, but sometimes it&#039;s like looking for a diamond in a rubbish tip.
So my suggestion would be for someone to be given a half page each week, to give details of interesting LD stories or campaigns on the web, for example:
&quot;This week, bloggville LDs on www.bloggsvilleLDS.co,uk have launched an interesting campaign about XXXXX (details and perhaps a photo). See their website for more details or contact Cllr. XXXX on XXXX.&quot;

This would integrate the printed medium with the electronic and be a real help to all campaigners looking for ideas or just more local news. It could also direct people towards blogs and sites like this and flock together.

With so many sites now run by Prater Raines it would not be too onerous a job for someone who can spare two or three hours and layout half a page! And it really would add relevance and a more immediate tone to LD News.

What do people think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duncan, as I don&#8217;t always agree with you, I do this with a certain amount of caution, because this time I do!</p>
<p>The other parties probably envy the fact that we as a party have so many ways to communicate with each other; through LD News, effective Internet communication, Grassroots Campaigner, Liberator, etc. After all the Tories only have the Daily Mail.<br />
And, Duncan, of course you are right that a printed paper, however short the deadlines cannot match the speed of the Internet. However, it does have certain advantages. The Internet is all very well, but sometimes it&#8217;s like looking for a diamond in a rubbish tip.<br />
So my suggestion would be for someone to be given a half page each week, to give details of interesting LD stories or campaigns on the web, for example:<br />
&#8220;This week, bloggville LDs on <a href="http://www.bloggsvilleLDS.co,uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.bloggsvilleLDS.co,uk</a> have launched an interesting campaign about XXXXX (details and perhaps a photo). See their website for more details or contact Cllr. XXXX on XXXX.&#8221;</p>
<p>This would integrate the printed medium with the electronic and be a real help to all campaigners looking for ideas or just more local news. It could also direct people towards blogs and sites like this and flock together.</p>
<p>With so many sites now run by Prater Raines it would not be too onerous a job for someone who can spare two or three hours and layout half a page! And it really would add relevance and a more immediate tone to LD News.</p>
<p>What do people think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Bowen</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/what-do-you-think-of-lib-dem-news-1482.html#comment-31287</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Bowen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/what-do-you-think-of-lib-dem-news-1482.html#comment-31287</guid>
		<description>Duncan - when the material from local parties never gets printed, is it a surprise that people don&#039;t bother?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duncan &#8211; when the material from local parties never gets printed, is it a surprise that people don&#8217;t bother?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Rennard</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/what-do-you-think-of-lib-dem-news-1482.html#comment-31286</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Rennard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/what-do-you-think-of-lib-dem-news-1482.html#comment-31286</guid>
		<description>I read John Pugh&#039;s original posting and subsequent comments with interest - of course.  Thanks are due to those who gave credit to a tiny and part-time team that does what no other political party can do ie. produce a weekly newspaper.  Both our main rivals used to do this, but gave up and said that it was not viable to continue production.
Lib Dem News appears each week, without cost to the party and plays a valuable role in internal communications and debate amongst supporters.
Its news stories and photographs obviously depend upon our national and local media output (which funnily enough tends to be pro-Lib Dem).  More stories and better photographs would be welcome - but it does not have a budget for &quot;stringers&quot; or hiring photographers outside conference week.  Critics should also note that it is also subscribed to by lobby journalists and our opponents.  So I have always tended to advise editors that we should not be printing ammunition for our opponents&#039; leaflets.

Well done Deirdre and team !  All of your long standing efforts on behalf of the party - of which producing Lib Dem News is only a part - are really appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read John Pugh&#8217;s original posting and subsequent comments with interest &#8211; of course.  Thanks are due to those who gave credit to a tiny and part-time team that does what no other political party can do ie. produce a weekly newspaper.  Both our main rivals used to do this, but gave up and said that it was not viable to continue production.<br />
Lib Dem News appears each week, without cost to the party and plays a valuable role in internal communications and debate amongst supporters.<br />
Its news stories and photographs obviously depend upon our national and local media output (which funnily enough tends to be pro-Lib Dem).  More stories and better photographs would be welcome &#8211; but it does not have a budget for &#8220;stringers&#8221; or hiring photographers outside conference week.  Critics should also note that it is also subscribed to by lobby journalists and our opponents.  So I have always tended to advise editors that we should not be printing ammunition for our opponents&#8217; leaflets.</p>
<p>Well done Deirdre and team !  All of your long standing efforts on behalf of the party &#8211; of which producing Lib Dem News is only a part &#8211; are really appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan Borrowman</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/what-do-you-think-of-lib-dem-news-1482.html#comment-31285</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Borrowman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 10:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/what-do-you-think-of-lib-dem-news-1482.html#comment-31285</guid>
		<description>As somebody who has very occassionally edited the paper and also occassionally done the layout I have seen the paper&#039;s workings from the inside.
The biggest issue I see is a lack of people supplying material. Other are right here. The editor is paid for a three day week and the person doing the layout for 2.5 days. This is a frighteningly short period of time.
Yes it can be a bit establishment, it can be a bit Pravda, but I am not aware of dissidents leaping up and down to write articles for it.
If people have a different take on events, or policy, or party direction they know the answer. Phone or email the editor, line up a copy date, and send in your piece. If you are an MP you probably stand a better chance of getting published than an armchair member.
One thing I have witnessed with letters is that many people responding to an article they disagree with resort to a rant, rather than a coherent answer. Succinct coherent responses stand far more chance of getting published.

On occassions I have edited the paper nobody has looked over my shoulder to check that I am toeing the line, and on weeks I have done the layout I have certainly been involved in picking letters that balance an argument and help to continue to provoke debate. of course it is the way of the world these days that if it is printed on paper and delivered through the Royal Mail there will be a lag in debate, that was acceptable 10 years ago but sticks out like a sore thumb in these days of t&#039;internet.
But the paper &quot;goes to bed&quot; late on Wednesday aftrenoon and usually falls through my letterbox on the Saturday. If you have an article lined up to go in, stick to the number of words promised and have it proof read before submitting it, electronically, you can get your words of wisdom in on Wednesady morning and have the readership hanging on your every word at the weekend. Of course if you fax in a poorly typed article with major flaws in the spelling, punctuation and grammar give the team a week or two to translate it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As somebody who has very occassionally edited the paper and also occassionally done the layout I have seen the paper&#8217;s workings from the inside.<br />
The biggest issue I see is a lack of people supplying material. Other are right here. The editor is paid for a three day week and the person doing the layout for 2.5 days. This is a frighteningly short period of time.<br />
Yes it can be a bit establishment, it can be a bit Pravda, but I am not aware of dissidents leaping up and down to write articles for it.<br />
If people have a different take on events, or policy, or party direction they know the answer. Phone or email the editor, line up a copy date, and send in your piece. If you are an MP you probably stand a better chance of getting published than an armchair member.<br />
One thing I have witnessed with letters is that many people responding to an article they disagree with resort to a rant, rather than a coherent answer. Succinct coherent responses stand far more chance of getting published.</p>
<p>On occassions I have edited the paper nobody has looked over my shoulder to check that I am toeing the line, and on weeks I have done the layout I have certainly been involved in picking letters that balance an argument and help to continue to provoke debate. of course it is the way of the world these days that if it is printed on paper and delivered through the Royal Mail there will be a lag in debate, that was acceptable 10 years ago but sticks out like a sore thumb in these days of t&#8217;internet.<br />
But the paper &#8220;goes to bed&#8221; late on Wednesday aftrenoon and usually falls through my letterbox on the Saturday. If you have an article lined up to go in, stick to the number of words promised and have it proof read before submitting it, electronically, you can get your words of wisdom in on Wednesady morning and have the readership hanging on your every word at the weekend. Of course if you fax in a poorly typed article with major flaws in the spelling, punctuation and grammar give the team a week or two to translate it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/what-do-you-think-of-lib-dem-news-1482.html#comment-31284</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 10:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/what-do-you-think-of-lib-dem-news-1482.html#comment-31284</guid>
		<description>Oh Lord, Jeremy, why did you say that?  Now we will have to wade through 600 more postings from Laurence justifying his original comment...

;-))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh Lord, Jeremy, why did you say that?  Now we will have to wade through 600 more postings from Laurence justifying his original comment&#8230;</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.libdemvoice.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George C</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/what-do-you-think-of-lib-dem-news-1482.html#comment-31283</link>
		<dc:creator>George C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 10:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/what-do-you-think-of-lib-dem-news-1482.html#comment-31283</guid>
		<description>Personally I always find it immensely impressive how professional a piece of work is produced every week, given the shoestring staff and budget (not even the editor is full time, AIUI). Of course it is on message. It is a publication produced by members of party staff based at party HQ. Attacking it for being tribal or on message is like attacking Friends of the Earth for not circulating articles by enviro-sceptics or CND for not including the case for Trident in its newsletters.

That said, in the run up to policy votes at conference it often does run for and against articles.

I actually think there is a place for defectors, news of council by-election victories, campaigning stories and so on. They are feel good stories basically. MPs and super-activists maybe don&#039;t need them, but I remember when I first became active and first read Lib Dem News. It was a very positive thing to see all this evidence of a &#039;family&#039; of campaigners across the country - some of them even being quite successful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I always find it immensely impressive how professional a piece of work is produced every week, given the shoestring staff and budget (not even the editor is full time, AIUI). Of course it is on message. It is a publication produced by members of party staff based at party HQ. Attacking it for being tribal or on message is like attacking Friends of the Earth for not circulating articles by enviro-sceptics or CND for not including the case for Trident in its newsletters.</p>
<p>That said, in the run up to policy votes at conference it often does run for and against articles.</p>
<p>I actually think there is a place for defectors, news of council by-election victories, campaigning stories and so on. They are feel good stories basically. MPs and super-activists maybe don&#8217;t need them, but I remember when I first became active and first read Lib Dem News. It was a very positive thing to see all this evidence of a &#8216;family&#8217; of campaigners across the country &#8211; some of them even being quite successful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

