Here, courtesy of the latest British Social Attitudes survey (published last year) is the answer:
What is notable is that whilst overwhelming numbers agree that “the income gap is too large”, and have consistently said so over the last 20 and more years, two of the possible routes to closing the gap have consistently fallen in popularity, namely using taxes or benefits.
Instead, it is policies such as providing better educational opportunities for the least well off (pupil premium anyone?) which best fit what the public says it wants although, as other evidence shows, the case for education needs to be made and can’t just be assumed by default.
Follow @LibDemVoice on Twitter
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Simon Hughes MP writes...My vote on the Same Sex Marriage Bill
11 Liberal Democrat MPs vote for registrars to be exempt from marrying same sex couples
How Liberal Democrat MPs voted on same sex marriage amendments
Same sex Marriage: another Liberal Democrat victory
Opinion: The media have failed the public over the Woolwich atrocity
An open letter to Tim Farron on unpaid internships
Don Foster writes: A powerful meeting where all faiths spoke with one voice
Simon Hughes MP writes…My vote on the Same Sex Marriage Bill
Report on internet pornography highlights need for education, not restriction
EU must get tough on tax'
medicalschool: In this photograph taken on April 17, 2013,...
Campaigning on the economy
Steam at Perth in the 1960s
Woolwich killing - let's not get carried away
Saturday Six 35 - @miss_s_b, Clegg, Royal Mail, Kimi and a Kitty...
Amalric
Geoffrey Payne
Meral Hussein Ece
Martin
Sam Barratt
2 Comments
It seems quite logical that many people do not equate raising benefits with the income equalisation. which they would support Most people think that most other people should work for a living – so raising ‘benefits’ which are equated in most minds with those not working (including those who should be), are not attractive to them. Similarly, a lot of people see that “any tax on the rich is also likely to tax me”. They also do not trust the government to only tax for what is needed. You only have to look at Prescott’s redundant billion pound Fire centres to see why.
Two relatively technical points. When the economy is in trouble and everyone knows there is a tight squeeze on public spending, a proposal to spend more on anything is likely to fall flat unless it can be presented strongly as contributing to recovery. While benefits increases actually would do a lot to improve retail performance (as one can be pretty sure nearly all the money would be spent), this point isn’t obvious. So I’m not surprised benefits spending is getting more unpopular, even leaving aside the impact of media campaigns.
As for government redistributing income, the graph shows that the idea became less popular fairly steadily for a long time but has been gaining gradually in popularity from 2004. I think here one needs to remember that people often like the idea of action on something but not specific proposals for action, and “government redistributing income” SOUNDS Big Brotherish – more Big Brotherish than “increasing the amount of income tax paid by rich people and reducing the amount paid by low-income people”, for example.