What Lib Dem members think of the impact of the Coalition

Lib Dem Voice has polled our members-only forum to discover what Lib Dem members think of various political issues, the Coalition, and the performance of key party figures. Over 500 party members responded, and we’re publishing the full results.

Party members give Lib Dems 7 out of 10 for influence within the Coalition

How would you rate the extent of the Liberal Democrat influence within the Coalition Government, where 10 is highly influential, and 1 indicates no influence.

      1: 0%
      2: 3%
      3: 11%
      4: 8%
      5: 9%

Lacking influence = 31%

      6: 18%
      7: 26%
      8: 17%
      9: 4%
      10: 2%

Achieving influence = 67%

This is the first time we’ve asked the party members who participate in LibDemVoice’s surveys this question, asking you to rank on a scale of 1-10 the level of influence you think the party is exerting within the Coalition. What’s clear from this first result is that the majority think the party is achieving influence: 67% give a mark in the upper range 6-10, compared with 31% in the lower range, 1-5. And I suspect a number of people who opted for 5/10 were probably indicating neutrality on the question. The modal average is 7/10, the mean average is 6/10.

This question replaces a question we had been tracking asking ‘Do you agree “yes or no“ with the following statement: The Coalition is implementing a significant part of the Lib Dem manifesto.’ The last two surveys had shown 80%+ of members agreeing with that statement. The question about the level of influence is deliberately intended to be a more subjective measure of how effective members feel the party is being within the Coalition at achieving Lib Dem goals.

60% of Lib Dems say Coalition is bad for party’s electoral health

Do you think the Coalition Government will be good or bad for the Lib Dems’ electoral prospects at the next general election?
(Changes since February 2012)

      15% (-1%) – Good
      60% (-1%) – Bad
      19% (+4%) – Neither good nor bad
    9% (+1%) – Don’t know / No opinion

Interestingly the figure of 60% of Lib Dem members believing the Coalition will be bad for the party’s election fortunes is the lowest since last September. It is, though, a far cry from July 2010, when a minority of party members, 43%, took that view. The 15% who think it will be good for the party is bang in the middle of party members’ expectations since summer 2010: the range has been a narrow pessimistic/realistic 13-17% of you.

80% say Coalition will last ’til 2015

How long do you expect the coalition government will last?
(Changes since February 2012)

      1% (n/c) – It will end this year, 2012
      5% (+2%) – It will end in 2013
      10% (+4%) – It will end in 2014
      80% (-8%) – It will last the full term, until 2015
    3% (n/c) – Don’t know / No opinion

The 80% of you who who think the Coalition will last the full course, though down on last month’s surprisingly high 88%, is still the second highest figure we’ve recorded since we’ve been asking this question. It’s clear the vast majority of you believe that, whatever the difficulties both parties are currently encountering, the Coalition will stay the full course of the first fixed-term parliament.

• Over 1,300 Lib Dem paid-up party members are registered with LibDemVoice.org. Some 507 responded to the latest survey, which was conducted between 4th and 8th March.
• Please note: we make no claims that the survey is fully representative of the Lib Dem membership as a whole. However, LibDemVoice.org’s surveys are the largest independent samples of the views of Lib Dem members across the country, and have in the past accurately predicted the winners of the contest for Party President, and the result of the conference decision to approve the Coalition agreement.
• The full archive of our members’ surveys can be viewed here

* Stephen Tall is Co-Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice, a Research Associate for the liberal think-tank CentreForum, and also writes at his own site, The Collected Stephen Tall.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in LDV Members poll.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/27593 for Twitter and emails.

5 Comments

  • paul barker 15th Mar '12 - 1:04pm

    Not massive enough for me, old age creeping up.

  • I think it’s massive.

    I thought at first I had hit zoom.

  • I put 3, I dont think thats lacking influence, the party has 57 MPs and is a minority partner in the coalition, I tend to see that teh liberals are having a proportional ammount of influence based on vote share, and generally a little higher, so i put 3,

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDominic 20th Jun - 6:13am
    FTT is indeed a dumb idea - just look what it did for Sweden's financial services industry when it tried it out some years back....
  • User AvatarDavid 20th Jun - 3:42am
    I'd be interested -- in fact, fascinated -- by this whole debate if I thought that the question were really up for decision. Since, however,...
  • User AvatarIan Patterson 19th Jun - 11:37pm
    Quelle Horreur. Nearly choked when reading liberator article today. we do not need more millionaires in ranks in lords, however 'active' they have been in...
  • User AvatarTim13 19th Jun - 9:45pm
    Interested to hear a comment from candidates' Office at HQ on the numbers of PPCs in place. For the 2005 and 2010 the party made...
  • User AvatarRoland 19th Jun - 8:29pm
    @Keith - Actually, I overlooked a couple of important points: Firstly Caron did say 'qualifies' rather than 'receives' - so apologies to Caron if I...
  • User AvatarDavid Pollard 19th Jun - 8:22pm
    I still fail to see the point of the Labour party. It's funded by the Unions but it does not support the working man. It...
Thu 20th Jun 2013
Fri 21st Jun 2013
Sat 22nd Jun 2013
Sun 23rd Jun 2013
Wed 26th Jun 2013
Thu 27th Jun 2013
Sat 29th Jun 2013
17:00
Sun 30th Jun 2013
Mon 1st Jul 2013
Wed 3rd Jul 2013
19:30
Thu 4th Jul 2013
Sat 6th Jul 2013
Sun 7th Jul 2013
Mon 8th Jul 2013
Thu 11th Jul 2013
Sat 13th Jul 2013
Sun 14th Jul 2013
Tue 16th Jul 2013
Wed 17th Jul 2013