What’s up on Act?

Chris Keating and Sam Lockwood from party HQ have penned this piece about the new LibDem social network, Act:

Launching a social network is a step into the unknown. If you open something up to thousands of Lib Dems then, frankly, the only thing you can expect is surprises. So those of us in Party HQ who are involved with online campaigning and supporter relations have been watching closely to see the kind of use people are making of this new tool.

We’ve been pleased so far with the response – over a thousand people registered in the last week, and a considerably higher number of outstanding invitations that members have sent to friends asking them to take a look.

It’s still very early, but there has been an interesting mixture of groups and events set up. Some are based around the kind of Party institutions you would expect to see at Party conferences – the Association of Lib Dem Councillors, for instance, or Liberal Youth, our energetic youth & student wing. It’s also interesting to see non-Party campaigns, for instance No2ID, starting groups and getting attention. There are signs that Act is working to assist debate and discussion, whether it’s people joining in groups associated with the formal Party policy process (like the working group on Quality of Life) or outside that structure (like the Social Liberal Forum). There are some light-hearted groups as well; you can join Act groups based on your preference for ale, lager or cider!

While Act is certainly helping some of the Party’s campaigns, whether it’s asking people to come on The Wave climate demo or co-ordinating action days, it’s significant that only a small proportion of what’s going on is being led by the Party centrally.

It’s interesting that one campaign has already leapt from Twitter to Blog to Act in the space of a few hours. Jo Swinson tweeted her irritation about being bumped from Question Time. Blogger Caron Lindsay posted about it and set up an Act group which has resulted in people on Act complaining to the BBC about the lack of Lib Dem representation on their programmes. I hope we’ll be seeing more of that kind of spontaneous self-mobilisation from Act in the future.

Act’s strength is its potential to bring together all the different kinds of activism I’ve mentioned.

From the perspective of someone thinking about getting involved for the first time, Act has the advantage that you can pick what you’re interested in and what you’re comfortable with.

And for people trying to get others interested in their campaigns or events, we hope that Act will soon have the critical mass of members and supporters that means it’s an obvious place to publicise what you’re doing.

But any network depends on its members more than anything else. Act is what you make of it!

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Online politics.
Advert

2 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarRoland 12th Feb - 10:20pm
    Junior doctors are highly intelligent people who have read the proposals for themselves & are not just listening to the BMA. If they think the...
  • User AvatarVictor Grayson 12th Feb - 9:34pm
    £22billion in foreign investment that is, sorry.
  • User AvatarVictor Grayson 12th Feb - 9:33pm
    @RC@petermartin2001-although figures are very difficult to dig out it would seem that the UK receives an average of £22 billion per month and invisible earnings...
  • User Avatarpetermartin2001 12th Feb - 9:19pm
    @ Victor Grayson, "what proportion of the monthly government borrowing requirement do you think is attributable to the balance of payments deficit ?" OK. Lets...
  • User AvatarCaron Lindsay 12th Feb - 9:02pm
    Ok, enough about housing now. We're supposed to be talking about conference.
  • User Avatarpetermartin2001 12th Feb - 8:58pm
    @RC @Victor Grayson. I'd say we are in some agreement on the difficulty in the attribution of causality. Nevertheless that's not to say there isn't...