Comments on: When a resignation is not quite what it seems http://www.libdemvoice.org/when-a-resignation-is-not-quite-what-it-seems-5156.html Our place to talk - an independent website for supporters of the Liberal Democrat party in the UK. Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:36:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: sanbikinoraion http://www.libdemvoice.org/when-a-resignation-is-not-quite-what-it-seems-5156.html#comment-66574 sanbikinoraion Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:31:24 +0000 http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=5156#comment-66574 What Richard said. This smacks of slimy rule-avoidance, and seems like nothing to be proud of. What Richard said. This smacks of slimy rule-avoidance, and seems like nothing to be proud of.

]]> By: Hywel Morgan http://www.libdemvoice.org/when-a-resignation-is-not-quite-what-it-seems-5156.html#comment-66537 Hywel Morgan Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:02:52 +0000 http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=5156#comment-66537 My recollection (English laws, a few years ago) was that two members was enough to form a group. It isn't completely unprecedented. In Hertfordshire (97-01 I think) we formed an administration group with Labour as that then meant that the coalition had a majority which entitled it to a majority on all committees under the proportionality rules. My recollection (English laws, a few years ago) was that two members was enough to form a group.

It isn’t completely unprecedented. In Hertfordshire (97-01 I think) we formed an administration group with Labour as that then meant that the coalition had a majority which entitled it to a majority on all committees under the proportionality rules.

]]> By: Richard http://www.libdemvoice.org/when-a-resignation-is-not-quite-what-it-seems-5156.html#comment-66536 Richard Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:28:56 +0000 http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=5156#comment-66536 I don't like to criticise without knowing full details, but this seems like a rather odd attempt to bend the rules over political balance -- rules I'd have thought we supported. I don’t like to criticise without knowing full details, but this seems like a rather odd attempt to bend the rules over political balance — rules I’d have thought we supported.

]]>