Why Tory Euro-sceptics should back Nick Clegg

Writing for ConHome, Lord Michael Dobbs argues against reform of the House of Lords because elected peers would behave differently from unelected peers:

I would demand more influence, a stronger voice, and that new power could come from only one place – the House of Commons.

There’s two flaws with that argument. The first, the most obvious, is the question of why, if such a transfer of power happens, should we fear it? Taking power away from elected politicians and giving it to the unelected is certainly often to be feared (though not always – judges and juries, not ministers, should rule in court cases, to take the obvious example). But taking power from one set of elected politicians and giving it to other elected politicians? There is no inherent reason to fear that. Indeed a good part of the time many in the Conservatives talk, quite rightly, about taking power away from Whitehall and giving it to local councils. That’d be taking powers away from MPs and giving them to councillors. And quite right too.

But the second flaw is the one that should appeal to Euro-sceptics (and don’t worry, it can appeal to pro-Europeans too). It is that the real shift of power with an elected House of Lords would be a shift of power towards Parliament and away from the government. A stronger, more democratic Parliament will be better placed to hold the government to account and to check its mistakes.

That would include one of the things which Euro-sceptics love to hate – the government implementing directives agreed at the European level with the British agreement and implementation frequently getting only limited scrutiny in Parliament. A reformed Lords, invigorated by the mandate of democracy, would be better placed to push for better scrutiny.

A more assertive Upper House courtesy of democratic mandate is not something to be feared. It is something to be welcomed.

* Mark Pack has written 101 Ways To Win An Election and produces a monthly newsletter about the Liberal Democrats.

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/27316 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

3 Comments

  • I’ve been somewhat lukewarm over an elected House of Lords (I’m like the idea of getting rid of it altogether and strengthening the House of Commons). But the more I read and learn about this particular reform, I have to admit, the more I like it.

  • We must go on the offensive about this. We cannot lose te public argument like we did over AV. Already the more PR savvy right wingers are pushing the conservative line and I am hearing very little back from our side. Apparently the House of Lords works well, ammending legislation with people from all walks of life blah blah blah
    We need to highlight that this is complete rubbish – it often linked to corporatist interests, it by it’s age profile (i.e. majority are pensioners!) is inately conservative and peers can act in the interest of themselves rather than constituents because their isn’t any payback.
    Having watched the beggining of the debate, i’ve hardly heard from the ERS (although lets face it there about as much use as a chocolate fireguard).
    So what do we do: First of all we need a new organisation – Something that could be called something like Lords Reform that can put the case accross cogently.
    Secondly we need to get our best media performers to fight our corner – no offense to Baroness Jolly and Lord Oakshott who I have seen fighting our corner but non lords big hitters may be our best bet – can we please have cabinet ministers, tim farron, Simon Hughes talking about this much more.
    This is our big opportunity to actually get something out of the coalition – lets not waste it!

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMeral Hussein Ece 31st Oct - 9:32pm
    A truly terrible inhumane decision . The increased numbers are due to the fact, as Sarah Teather rightly says, the Middle East is burning. How...
  • User AvatarPaul in Wokingham 31st Oct - 9:24pm
    A little detail on that Rochester poll mentioned by malc: the sample size was 1012. The total number of people who said they intended to...
  • User AvatarMalcolm Todd 31st Oct - 9:14pm
    Indeed, people should keep their comments short if they want to be read. I often skim past very long comments, especially if they seem particularly...
  • User AvatarCaron Lindsay 31st Oct - 9:02pm
    Fraser, people can't help their voices, and if you are going to dismiss her like that, then you are the one who is missing out....
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 31st Oct - 9:01pm
    I don't agree with word limits, but Sara makes a decent point: long posts can be counter-productive. I think they are less likely to be...
  • User AvatarFraser 31st Oct - 8:50pm
    Sorry but Alison is the most uninspiring MSP in Holyrood. Maybes its her voice or somthing but she just made me want to watch paint...