Lib Dem Voice polled our members-only forum recently to discover what Lib Dem members think of various political issues, the Coalition, and the performance of key party figures. Some 550 party members have responded, and we’re publishing the full results.
84% think the CofE should allow women to be come bishops
84% – Should allow women bishops
2% – Should not allow women bishops
10% – Neither
4% – Don’t know
An unsurprisingly overwhelming backing for women to be allowed to become bishops within the Church of England. Most of the 10% ‘neithers’ were a variety of don’t cares (atheists, disestablishmentarians et al).
But 66% oppose parliamentary intervention over the issue
Would you support or oppose Parliament intervening to change the law to force the Church of England to accept female bishops?
24% – Support: it is wrong that the Church does not allow female Bishops and if they won’t act themselves Parliament should intervene
66% – Oppose: whether it is right or wrong, it should be a matter for the Church to decide. It would be an attack on religious freedom for Parliament to interfere
7% – Neither
3% – Don’t know
A slightly more mixed response here: two-thirds oppose direct parliamentary intervention in the established church to enforce state laws, though many in their comments made that conditional on the church seeking disestablishment if it wishes to avoid state interference. Almost a quarter of respondents, however, are happy for parliament to get more pro-active.
And 66% also support bishops being removed from the House of Lords
If the Church of England does not allow women to become bishops do you think all bishops should be denied the right to sit and vote in the House of Lords?
14% – Yes, in that circumstance, they should be removed from the House of Lords
66% – Yes, but I think all bishops should be removed from the House of Lords in any case
14% – No, they should not be removed from the House of Lords
4% – None of these
2% – Don’t know
A result which combines two historic liberal arguments — disestablishment of the Church of England AND the abolition of the House of Lords — with two-thirds wanting to see bishops removed from the Upper Chamber altogether, regardless of the CofE’s position on women bishops.
Here’s a selection of your comments:
Even the Church of England thinks that the Church of England should allow women to become bishops. It’s only the Synod’s bizarre voting system that prevented change.
The internal governance of a religious organisation is its own business. The CoE’s established status complicates matters, but the solution is to disestablish, not to interfere.
I think it is very plain that the majority DO want women Bishops. The evangelical and anglo-catholic wings will never agree, so there must be better provision for these minorities, which was a stumbling block all along.
If we ban them from sitting in the Lords for this, it would indicate that it’s ok for one religion to be there at the expense of others. They shouldn’t be there full stop.
It is not parliament’s place to intervene and the CofE should be permitted to do as they please.However, this being the case, the CofE should have no place in state affairs, the legislature or privileged access to government.
It has to be decided on theological grounds (on which I think they are wrong). It is not unreasonable that theological issues will conflict with the secular standards of the time. It would be fundamentally wrong for non believers or a secular body to intervene in a religous matter – about as illiberal as you can get.
This is not an area a political party (especially one lead by an someone who is not a member of the CoE) should have an opinion on. I support disestablishment of the CoE so they can sort their own problems out
* Stephen Tall is Co-Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice, and editor of the 2013 publication, The Coalition and Beyond: Liberal Reforms for the Decade Ahead. He is also a Research Associate for the liberal think-tank CentreForum and writes at his own site, The Collected Stephen Tall.