MPs vote to reform Parliament – and reject Tory/Labour plan to water down plans

From the BBC:

MPs have backed a series of reforms aimed at beefing up the ability of backbenchers to create new laws and hold the government to account.

Proposals backed include a creating a backbench committee to set a timetable for Commons business.

A bid by the Labour and Tory front benches to restrict the committee to setting a timetable for just 15 days per session was rejected by MPs…

The reforms were drawn up by Labour MP and chairman of the public administration committee Tony Wright in the wake of last year’s expenses scandal…

MPs also agreed to back proposals ensuring the chairman of the Public Accounts Committee – the key watchdog that scrutinises government spending – is always an opposition MP (to ensure the government is held properly to account), and to eject any member of a committee who does not attend at least 60% of meetings.

But they rejected an amendment put forward by the Conservative leadership and supported by the government, to restrict a new backbench committee to timetabling just 15 days’ business per session.

Lib Dem frontbencher David Heath said it was “too restrictive” and it was opposed by members of Tony Wright’s cross-party reform committee…

MPs also approved a process for electing deputy speakers – which have been chosen by party whips in the past.

Mention should also be made of Evan Harris, who has been particularly active at supporting these reforms. Well down David, Evan and others.

Share:
This entry was posted in Parliament and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/18195 for twitter and emails. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

3 Comments

  • Posted 5th March 2010 at 11:26 am | Permalink

    Stunning. This is a bigger change than I think anyone expected. If the whips are prevented from nobbling the business committee then the Commons might just be able to scrutinise Government properly.

    One question – my understanding is that Commons time is now divided into Government time and business committee time (and presumably also some “fixed” time like Question Time, etc) – can the time under the business committee’s control be allocated to extend scrutiny of Public Bills beyond the guillotine, or can the Government still cut scrutiny short?

  • Posted 5th March 2010 at 3:17 pm | Permalink

    I am very encouraged by this development. A number of pieces of Database State legislation, including the Identity Cards Act, were rushed through by the Government with insufficient time for scrutiny.

  • HarryD
    Posted 6th March 2010 at 7:48 am | Permalink

    Very pleasantly suprised – the last testament of a sick parliament?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but will not publish personally abusive comments. Our comments policy is published here, please respect it and all readers of the site.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Do you agree to the T&Cs?