Yesterday in the Lords (part 1): let the banner of rebellion be unfurled…

In a dramatic fifth day of the Report Stage of the Welfare Reform Bill, Liberal Democrat cohesion amongst the Parliamentary Party in the Lords collapsed, with two of the three biggest rebellions in this Parliament ensuing. And, to be honest, it wasn’t difficult to see it coming. However, unexpectedly, only one of them led to a Government defeat.

Amendment 58D, moved by Labour peer, Lord Mackenzie of Luton, was a relatively opportunistic attempt to provide an exemption from the proposed benefit cap for “vulnerable individuals, and individuals and couples with children”, threatened with homelessness, owed a duty to be provided with temporary accommodation or who had been accepted as homeless and in priority need. Opportunistic because, as one Peer commented, it looked as though it had been drawn up on the back of an envelope.

Baroness Walmsley, whilst supporting the Amendment, noted;

I do not necessarily think that it is exactly the right amendment, but we need to send it back to another place and ask it to think again and tell us a little more about the measures that will be put in place — I hope that they will be, and know that the Government intend that they will be — to make sure that families with children are not made homeless.

and Baroness Hussein-Ece pleaded on behalf of the diversity of urban communities;

I want to live in a mixed community. I do not want to live in a Paris-style ghetto. I do not want ghettos such as in Paris, where the poorer families have been forced into the doughnut outside the city. We should support mixed communities. We want our children to have a healthy outlook and mix with people from all different backgrounds.

Repeatedly, Liberal Democrat Peers sought reassurance from the Minister, with Lords Ashdown and German offering Lord Freud every opportunity to offer clarity on transitional arrangements, and reassurance that families would not be made homeless as a result of the proposed changes in the Bill. But clarity and reassurance came there none.

With the Crossbenchers having hitherto voted heavily against the Government, it looked likely that another defeat loomed. And then, relief for the Minister, as the Crossbenchers split 52-31 against the Amendment, and with seventeen Liberal Democrat rebels outweighed by forty-two remaining loyal to the Government, the Amendment was lost by twenty-eight votes, 250-222.

Liberal Democrats supporting the Amendment were as follows;

    Avebury, Lord
    Greaves, Lord
    Hamwee, Baroness
    Hussein-Ece, Baroness (her first rebellion of this Parliament)
    Kirkwood of Kirkhope, Lord
    Maclennan of Rogart, Lord
    Miller of Chilthorne Domer, Baroness
    Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay, Lord
    Roberts of Llandudno, Lord
    Sharp of Guildford, Baroness (her first rebellion of this Parliament)
    Shipley, Lord
    Smith of Clifton, Lord
    Taylor of Goss Moor, Lord
    Thomas of Winchester, Baroness
    Tonge, Baroness
    Tyler, Lord
    Walmsley, Baroness

This represented the second largest Liberal Democrat rebellion of this Parliament to date, only topped by the nineteen Peers voting against the Government on the European Union Bill on 15 June last year. But worse was to follow…

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News and Parliament.
Advert

5 Comments

  • Nick (not Clegg) 24th Jan '12 - 7:52am

    “But worse was to follow … ”

    Or better – depending on your point of view.

  • How will having to move out of places like Richmond impoverish people? No one wants to see families have to move but you can’t expect the vast bulk of British people on moderate incomes to put people up in houses that they could only dream of affording…

    We all say we want to avoid Paris style “ghettos” but London already has areas far worse than the worst Paris has to offer… what would your solution to this be? To tax middle earners more so they can only afford to live in places like Brixton whilst moving some of the worst off from Brixton to Chelsea? The current housing benefit strategy doesn’t keep our communities “integrated”. It mean the most expensive communities are simply full of the rich and those on benefits, two of the smallest niches of our country, whilst there is no representation of the middle.

  • Tony Greaves 24th Jan '12 - 2:43pm

    We are going to end up with them full of just the rich. (And I don’t think it’s Richmond that people are going to move into!)

    Tony Greaves

  • James Sandbach 24th Jan '12 - 3:09pm

    Tony – what’s your position on the Legal Aid Bill? Are you taking an interest in this – raises similar issues to welfare reform etc..

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMichael 23rd Aug - 6:30pm
    One of the difficulties of public health policies is weighing the alternatives. Massive harm to younger people is done by alcohol use. You just need...
  • User AvatarJames 23rd Aug - 6:15pm
    Dav - (a) There are many examples of the opposite actually happening in countries which have taken a different approach to drugs. Regardless, recreational drug...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 23rd Aug - 6:14pm
    @ Caron, "All women have the right to be in public where they please". Yes, of course, and doesn't that include sitting in a women's...
  • User AvatarLester Holloway 23rd Aug - 5:58pm
    jayne Mansfield: "My last post has not appeared, but I have to say that you don’t speak for the Asians and Muslims that I know....
  • User AvatarFrances Alexander 23rd Aug - 5:51pm
    Lynne Featherstone has the answer!
  • User AvatarTim13 23rd Aug - 5:50pm
    William Ross - Even if your contention that all Brexiteers want to leave "the superstate" lock stock and barrel, that is because the Daily Mail...