Your essential weekend reader — my personal pick of the week’s must-reads

It’s Saturday evening, so here are twelve thought-provoking articles to stimulate your thinking juices culled from all those I’ve linked to this last week. You can follow me on Delicious here.

Political predictions: as the year ends, what does 2013 hold for the main party leaders? – Andrew Rawnsley sanely assesses the 12 months to come: ‘Nick Clegg and David Cameron face more of the same. Ed Miliband’s future is more complicated. He has choices.’

No longer the dunce – Anne McElvoy whispers the shocking news gently: British schools are getting better. Oh, and there’s no one system that works best: ‘The single unifying feature of improving systems remains better quality teaching and parental drive.’

At last, proof that two heads can be better than one – Matthew d’Ancona on the dog that didn’t bark in 2012: the Coalition is still intact, in spite of everything: ‘what this Mid-Term Review truly reflects is something new, unexpected and of deep constitutional significance: nothing less than the viability of duumvirate.’

The fiscal cliff: Bipolar disorder – the Economist muses on how ‘to present centrist political compromises to partisan voters who are prone to view them as betrayals’, and the parallels between the US and Europe.

Well, SOMEBODY has to win – Anthony Wells wraps up the New Year’s polemical debate on whether it’s inevitable Tories/Labour can/cannot win in 2015: ‘I suspect in many cases people’s predictions this early say a lot more about their own personal preferences or what political axes they have to grind against their party leaderships than what is likely to happen at the next election.’

Only fools claim to know the future – John Kay re-states the obvious (it’s sometimes necessary): ‘Managers who know the future are more often dangerous fools than great visionaries.’

It’s still the economy, stupid, which is why the two Eds should be worried about 2013 – Atul Hatwal with some hard truths for Labour: ‘We are now further behind the Tories on the economy than at the time of the last election, and that’s after all of the pain of the past two and a half years.’

After a rape and murder, fury in Delhi – a gut-wrenching account by Basharat Peer: ‘India could have told the story of that fearless young woman as a story of its success, had she not lost her life to the brutal assault.’

In Defence of Rights – Philippe Sands and Helena Kennedy‘s look back at their time serving on the Commission on a Bill of Rights, intended by Tories to tear up the Human Rights Act: ‘The intolerance and lack of support appear to come largely from UKIP and Conservative Party stalwarts in various parts of England where the issue of Europe remains charged.’

How ‘child protection’ policies harm children – Frank Furedi argues against the plan to create a new database of children who visit A&E units: ‘what policymakers overlook is that the knowledge that all children’s injuries will be logged on a database will lead some parents to think twice before they go anywhere near an A&E.’

CentreForum’s Liberal Hero of the Week #27: Jack Whitehall – find out why the ‘sick’ Channel 4 comic got the nod from me this week.

Colorado’s Pro-Pot Vote Shows the Fading of Evangelical Fervor – Clint Rainey wonders why the religious conservatives who brought you Reefer Madness rolled over for Amendment 64: ‘The religious right was MIA, but a smattering of mainline pastors, black clergy, and other Christian leaders did speak out in opposition, stepping into the big, empty, clown-size shoes they’d never fill.’

* Stephen was Editor (and Co-Editor) of Liberal Democrat Voice from May 2007 to Jan 2015, and writes at The Collected Stephen Tall.

Read more by or more about , , , , , , , , , , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/32494 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

One Comment

  • Jack Whitehall is no more a liberal just because he’s offensive than he is an aristocrat just because his Nouveau Riche parents sent him to a posh school. By that same logic you could declare Nick Griffin a liberal, but I suspect that because Griffin is racist rather than the more socially acceptable misogyny of Whitehall it’s less likely to happen.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarCaracatus 5th Mar - 3:38am
    It takes a particular form of optimism when a poll places the Lib Dems third behind the Tories in West Aberdeenshire to say "support is...
  • User Avatarmalc 5th Mar - 12:57am
    You have one of the very few popular UK politicians in Charles Kennedy and you never seem to use him. Whoever is running your campaign...
  • User AvatarHywel 5th Mar - 12:28am
    Al - no they didn't that's the standard 2 question Ashcroft poll. You would expect that will a very well known figure like Charles that...
  • User AvatarAl 4th Mar - 11:55pm
    Actually, what Caron is hiding or is not aware of is that they DID ask what difference Charles Kennedy makes as a candidate. as Prof...
  • User AvatarDan Falchikov 4th Mar - 11:48pm
    Saddam Hussein isn't dead, the American forces are retreating on all fronts, Bagdad isn't under attack... I think it is time for the Scottish Lib...
  • User Avatarmalc 4th Mar - 11:42pm
    Bad news for Labour and the LibDems, but I disagree that it is worse for Labour. If Charles Kennedy was to lose his seat -...