How YouTube is being used on the ground in the general election

Richard Osley as an entertaining piece on his blog titled, “The You Tube War: Hornsey and Wood Green”.

I’m not quite sure what Lynne Featherstone will make of the description of her as an “old aunt” :-) Not very gallant of you Richard, but the full description is friendly:

One of the reasons, Featherstone has been a hit locally, it seems, is her obvious knowledge of the area and her apparent interest in even the smallest of issues. She is the interfering old aunt that the fragile Labour council in Haringey must be sick to the back teeth of. Featherstone has after all micromanaged the constituency to a tee. Take her YouTube efforts below. She plays the part of peeved of train customer superbly.

The full piece is well worth a read, particularly for the good spot about a problem with one of Labour’s films in Hornsey & Wood Green, saying of the Labour candidate:

She has fewer outings on YouTube, but there is this gem in which she attempts to tell voters that she is a candidate that should be taken seriously… by hauling in the John Prescott battle bus. He grinds his teeth about the Liberals and insists he’s here to help win it back for Labour. Shame then, that at about 1min 11secs [actually 50 seconds] in the film, he looks sleepy-eyed and half asleep on the stage when Jennings is addressing a members rally.

One point not mentioned is that YouTube views can give a sense of how well different campaigns are running. They are not a perfect standard by any means, but they are more useful than the web polls we sometimes see which are open to anyone to vote in and easy to vote in more than once.

So in Hornsey & Wood Green, where the future of the Whittington Hospital is a big issue we see the following numbers of YouTube views:

  • For the Hornsey & Wood Green Liberal Democrat films on the topic: 378, 224
  • For the Hornsey & Wood Green Labour films on the topic: 73, 22

You can watch all Lynne Featherstone’s films at www.youtube.com/lynnefeatherstone

Read more by or more about , , , , , or .
This entry was posted in Online politics.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/18678 for Twitter and emails.

One Comment

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarSimon Shaw 20th Aug - 11:28am
    @matt "As far as I understood the “bedroom tax ” for private tenants, this was introduced for new tenants. It did not effect those immediately...
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 20th Aug - 11:27am
    David Allen All Bolano is telling us is, that that would have been much better politics. (And better for the nation too.) No he's not....
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 20th Aug - 11:12am
    Bolano No – my argument, my point is first of all a pragmatic one. I think your narrative of the coalition is a more honest...
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 20th Aug - 11:07am
    Steve You are also demonstrating a naive political awareness if you think that the way to sell state funding of HE to the electorate is...
  • User AvatarCaron Lindsay 20th Aug - 10:55am
    Allan, do you want the House of Lords actually ditched? Surely a second chamber elected on a different basis should be there as a check...
  • User AvatarPeter Watson 20th Aug - 10:51am
    Richard's comments and the ensuing debate have piqued my curiosity. It also makes me feel a little embarrassed by my own ignorance, but it's good...