Michael Brown: Electoral Commission resumes investigation into Lib Dem donations

As disclosed by Sir Peter Viggers MP (Con., Gosport), who represents the Speaker’s Committee on the Electoral Commission:

The Electoral Commission informs me that following the recent conclusion of criminal proceedings against Mr. Michael Brown, it has now resumed its investigation into the permissibility of donations made to the Liberal Democrat Party by Mr. Brown in 2005.

The Commission further informs me that it will now aim to conclude the investigation as quickly as possible, but that its priority must be to ensure that the process is fair and thorough.”

Hat-tip to ConservativeHome, though they somehow omitted to quote the 2006 statement by the Electoral Commission which made crystal clear that the Commission believed the Liberal Democrats had acted in good faith in relation to Michael Brown’s £2.4 million donation:

The Electoral Commission has previously made clear its view that it was reasonable for the Liberal Democrats – based on the information available to them at the time – to regard the donations they received from 5th Avenue Partners Ltd in 2005, totaling just over £2.4m, as permissible.

It remains the Commissions view that the Liberal Democrats acted in good faith at that time, and the Commission is not re-opening the question of whether the party or its officers failed to carry out sufficient checks into the permissibility of the donations.

The Commission had, though, also made it pretty clear they would look again at things when the police case was concluded:

… we have always said that if any additional information that has a bearing on the permissibility of the donations comes to light, for example as a result of the ongoing police investigation or legal proceedings relating to the affairs of 5th Avenue, we would consider the matter further.

You can see the archive of Lib Dem Voice articles relating to Michale Brown here. And, coincidentally, Lib Dem MP David Howarth wrote an article for LDV today explaining how the Lib Dems would reform politcal party financing, if it weren’t for the obstruction of Labour and the Tories.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.


  • There’s something quite absurd in suggesting that Labour and the Conservatives are obstructing Lib Dem reforms to party finance reforms. Since when do the Lib Dems get to call the shots? Make a contribution, make suggestions, fine. But claim pre-eminence on this issue? Grow up.

  • Mark Williams 12th Dec '08 - 9:36am

    “It is amazing this has dragged on for so long, and I suppose it has damaged the reputation of the party accordingly, but there really is no reason to believe that the party has done anything wrong.”

    Apart from hanging onto a £2.4 million donation from an impermissible donor. You really are as delusional as Gordon Brown.

  • Grammar Police 12th Dec '08 - 10:09am

    Oh, we forgot again, Mark Williams is the man who decides what donations are permissible or otherwise. As I’ve said many times before – I’m sure you realise it’s not as clear cut as you’d like it to be.

    I’d be interested to know if you post about Tory donations abuses on Conhome/equivalent.

  • Terry Gilbert 12th Dec '08 - 9:07pm

    Was Jeffrey Archer an impermissable donor? Or Jonathan Aitken? How much did they give? How much was returned when they were jailed? I think we should be told.

  • And I seem to recall that a certain Dr Harold Shipman was a Conservative local government candidate.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarGlenn 14th Dec - 4:49pm
    I don't think the Lib Dems were attracting soft Conservatives. I think the success was in seats where people opposed to the Conservative Party are...
  • User Avatarfrankie 14th Dec - 4:43pm
    The challenge for the party is to connect with as many voters as possible. The fallacy that we can target a core vote is just...
  • User AvatarDan 14th Dec - 4:38pm
    I think as a party we misunderstood Brexit and Europe. We tried shouting at the keavers and drove them into the waiting arms of the...
  • User AvatarNonconformistradical 14th Dec - 4:34pm
    @Richard Armitage "As a Labour member I also thought the idea of a progressive alliance was a good one." Please tell us what you mean...
  • User AvatarMike MacSween 14th Dec - 4:16pm
    Lawrence Fullick 14th Dec '19 - 2:39pm "Mike MacSween There are times when a policy passed by Conferenve is a vote loser among parts of...
  • User AvatarPhil Beesley 14th Dec - 4:08pm
    @David Becket: "I would agree that attacking Corbyn was one of Jo’s many mistakes..." I reckon that kicking a player when they are down is...
Tue 7th Jan 2020