Tag Archives: strathclyde review

LibLink: Jim Wallace: House of Lords must not become an impotent debating society

Following the publication of the Strathclyde Review, the Tories’ revenge attack on the House of Lords, Jim Wallace has written for Politics Home to say that we need a strong second chamber to keep the Government under control.

He looks back at the Tax Credits issue and criticises the Government’s strategy of trying to limit the debate in the Lords:

The Government proposed this change in an SI, for which the scrutiny process is considerably weaker. Each House would only have a single debate on an issue, with the Commons’ time severely limited. It could, of course, have brought the measure forward in primary legislation, where much more detailed scrutiny is possible. And if they had inserted clauses into the Finance Bill, the Lords could not have touched it. But Ministers, fearing perhaps that a number of Tory rebels might join forces with the opposition in the Commons to amend the Bill, chose the route which offered least resistance. Or so they thought.

But, the House of Lords voted to delay implementation of the changes to tax credits until transitional protections were put in place. The Government’s response was to throw its hands up in horror at the temerity of the Lords daring to express a view that was contrary to theirs.

Having lost the argument, says Jim, the Government is now trying to change the rules:

Posted in News | Also tagged , and | 9 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Meg Thomas
    We need to be very fearful of unbridled capitalism. I think it has fuelled inequality and been very damaging. Some people in this thread seem like libertarians...
  • Kira Collins
    @Peter Martin “ In 2024/25, the Barnett block grant amounted to £45bn in Scotland, £20bn in Wales and £18bn in N.Ireland. I would term these payments as f...
  • expats
    @theakes 8th Jun '26 - 12:20pm... We simple have to accept there will always be a level of inequality, it is in the human psyche.... Most families DON'T have...
  • Peter Davies
    @Peter Wrigley: You will be glad to know that the wealth ratio between the richest and poorest is already much lower than 10:1. It is in fact negative. There wi...
  • Nigel Jones
    @Mick Taylor, I agree we must be concerned about income inequality in current circumstances, though overcoming this is about taxing the rich, better public serv...