A taxing mystery from yesterday in Parliament

Liberal Democrat MP Julian Huppert tweeted yesterday:

In chamber listening to Finance Bill debate. Labour trying to reduce (!) capital gains rate from 28% to 25%. No, I don’t understand why!

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Parliament.
Advert

8 Comments

  • David Boothroyd 14th Jul '10 - 12:02am

    As was explained by Stephen Timms in moving the amendment, it was a probing amendment to inquire about the processes which led the Government to choose to set the rate of CGT at 28%. I know Mr Huppert is a new MP but I would have thought he was knowledgable enough to know what a probing amendment is.

  • Chris Stanbra 14th Jul '10 - 7:39am

    Its a high risk probing amendment then. Labour’s opponents can now say they wanted a lower rate of CGT and sought to amend the budget accordingly.

  • Andrea Gill 14th Jul '10 - 9:46am
  • Stuart Mitchell 14th Jul '10 - 11:21am

    Chris: “Labour’s opponents can now say they wanted a lower rate of CGT”

    But since Timms stated clearly that “we will not vote… for the lower figure proposed in the three amendments”, anybody who knew this yet claimed or implied that Labour wanted a lower rate of CGT would be extremely dishonest, wouldn’t they?

  • Terry Gilbert 14th Jul '10 - 12:24pm

    A more important mystery is why so many Liberal Democrats felt Andrew George’s sensible amendment requesting an impact assessment of the VAT rise was unacceptable.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Roland
    @nick Baird - “ or whether it was just a terrible mistake caused by a lack of attention and professionalism by the officers involved.” I think this is th...
  • David Murray
    Typo: I first joined the Liberal Party in November 1966, almost 60 years ago this year !...
  • Tristan Ward
    Personally I'm with Tim Farron who is quoted in the Politics Home article as saying the Lib Dems ought to be the party for sensible people, or words to that eff...
  • David Murray
    The current 'explainer' and previous editions seem to be obsessed with statistics, rather than being a proactive guide to the way forward. We don't want to foll...
  • Tony Ferguson
    Lets hope the Board and the Conference Committee can agree to schedule this at a time when most members will have arrived in Brighton and not at 9am on Saturday...