Here’s the video footage of US Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney addressing a private fundraising event:
And here’s the killer quotes:
“There are 47% of the people who will vote for the president no matter what. All right, there are 47% who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe that government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it. That that’s an entitlement. And the government should give it to them. And they will vote for this president no matter what … Our message of low taxes doesn’t connect … so my job is is not to worry about those people. I’ll never convince them that they should take personal responsibility and care for their lives. What I have to do is convince the five to 10 percent in the center that are independents, that are thoughtful….”
It’s a pretty staggering statement — a politician running for office writing off almost half the electorate as ‘victims’ not worth worrying about. It’s true of course that a message of low taxes is unlikely personally to connect with folk who don’t pay taxes to begin with, but the disdain he shows for vast swathes of the public is breathtaking. The scale of the gaffe is such that even Mitt Romney’s own dig-your-own-hole defence of his comments is unutterably weak. I’d always assumed that, whatever else might be said about Mitt Romney, he’s a smart guy. Not so much, it seems.
* Stephen was Editor (and Co-Editor) of Liberal Democrat Voice from 2007 to 2015, and writes at The Collected Stephen Tall.
8 Comments
“… the disdain he shows for vast swathes of the public is breathtaking.”
The fact that he said it in public may be breathtaking, but surely you realise that a lot of people think like that?
He’s toast, surely?
I’m not so sure. As Chris says, a lot of people think like that and the Americans have elected some terrible Presidents. I think the election will be closer than we think, but Obama will win.
Bain capital (the company that Romney co-founded and used to run) has a well-known MO: they buy perfectly good companies, then front-loading them with debt, take hefty dividends and then let the company collapse into bankruptcy.
That’s not me saying that – it’s Newt Gingrich during the Republican candidate debates.
There’s an excellent article about Bain Capital on the Washington Post website : http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/romneys-bain-capital-record-shows-mixed-record-on-bankruptcies/2011/12/13/gIQANksluO_story.html
It is an interesting insight into Romney’s worldview that he made a fortune by using financial wizardry to destroy sound businesses that employed many US citizens and then lambasts those same citizens for having the audacity to be unemployed. The word “sociopath” does spring to mind.
PiT
It’s plain old-fashioned asset stripping.
BTW does Romney pay HIS income tax? Last time I heard he was refusing to publish his tax returns and that can only be because they hide something nasty.
With foreign policy and trade linked as it cynics have been known to refer to Britain as the 51st State – a joke that is not entirely without substance. If Romney is elected will we still be laughing ?
But there is a payroll vote in any country and it’s a big part of why the LibDem poll ratings have fallen.
The other interesting thing is that (given he thinks he’s fighting over 5 to ten percent only) he also holds the unstated assumption that about 45 percent will vote against the president “no matter what”. Given US elections tend to have fairly low turnout I would say hiss general analysis of what is going on is wrong – no one group is guaranteed to all go and vote anyway, let alone for the same candidate.