Andrew Stunell MP writes… Launching the Liberal Democrats’ local election campaign

Local Election Day is now exactly a month away for most of Metropolitan England as well as across the whole of Scotland and Wales. Nick Clegg was in my own area of Stockport earlier today to officially launch the Liberal Democrat local election campaign, visiting a local business and speaking with councillors, business owners and local people.

I’ve no doubt that many of you have been out on the doorstep over the last few months, talking to people and showing them what we are achieving both nationally and locally.

You will already have your big messages in place. Number one has got to be your local record of service – all year round, not just at election time. Lib Dem councillors across the country work hard for local people. We listen to our communities and try to give them a voice in decisions made that affect them. In power we work to protect the services people most value, and to protect the most vulnerable in society.

The second message is that we are putting more money back in the pockets of hardworking people – something we can trumpet because of action we’ve taken both locally and nationally. On the local front, this year every single Lib Dem-run council has frozen their council tax bills – for the second year running. Neither Labour nor the Conservatives can say the same, with Labour-run Redcar, Leicester and Nottingham, and Tory-run Peterborough, Chelmsford and Surrey among the culprits who are driving up their bills this year. Four Lib Dem Councils – Eastleigh, Hinckley & Bosworth, Three Rivers, and South Lakeland – are even cutting their portion of the council tax bill this year!

Nationally, from this Friday, Liberal Democrats will deliver another £130 income tax cut to every basic rate taxpayer. That’s 25 million people getting a tax cut and 1 million people lifted out of paying Income Tax altogether thanks to us. And we’re making the rich pay. They face increased capital gains tax, an annual banker’s levy (worth £2.5bn each year) and even having to pay VAT on their private jets – something that despite all their posturing, Labour never got around to doing when they were in power. Combined with £900m invested in the battle against tax evasion, and the caps on tax reliefs introduced in the budget, we’re also doing more to make sure the rich actually do pay their fair share, and can’t dodge it.

There’s plenty else. The second year of record rises to Pensions, with pensioners set to benefit from a rise of £5.30 a week this year, on top of the £4.50 rise last year. There’s an extra £1.25bn for the Pupil Premium, targeted at our most disadvantaged pupils ensuring that they can have a fair start in life as well. We’re creating jobs, and supporting young people in the difficult path back into work by driving a record expansion of apprenticeships to over half a million, and the Youth Contract, announced yesterday, designed to get over 400,000 young people earning or learning.

And we’re giving real power and control back to local areas, particularly over planning. We’re protecting the Greenbelt and Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty, ensuring that Brownfield land is used first for development, whilst also striking a sensible balance between protecting the environment and building the homes we so desperately need. And we’re giving councils and communities real say over what is developed in their areas through neighbourhood planning. Planning is set to become a bottom-up community-driven process, not the top-down imposition it’s been for far too long. Lib Dems across the country should be getting out on the doorstep and canvassing their communities to see what they want in their local plan. What kind of development do they want to see and where? It’s a huge campaigning opportunity for the party, and is just the kind of “community politics” we’ve championed for decades. Richard Kemp has already told LDV readers that he’s all set to start the process in his ward in Liverpool from day one, so there’s no reason why every Lib Dem councillor and candidate shouldn’t be using this opportunity as well.

This is a challenging round of local elections – it’s only the second we’ve ever fought as a party of government. We’ve had some tough choices to make, and at time some difficult compromises too, a necessity of coalition. But we’ve also achieved a lot of what we have campaigned for, and there is more to come. We need to get out on the doorsteps and remind people why they vote for our hardworking candidates locally, and what benefits we’ve been able to deliver as part of the Coalition nationally.

* Andrew Stunell is the Liberal Democrat MP for Hazel Grove, was a member of the all-party parliamentary inquiry into electoral conduct and is a former communities minister.

Read more by or more about , , , , , or .
This entry was posted in Local government.


  • Tony Greaves 3rd Apr '12 - 7:02pm

    It’s really time we stopped talking up the new planning regime. Local Plans will be just as constrained by national rules as they were before – it’s just that they are different rules. Neighbourhood plans will be no use to most people – they can indeed set out where development is possible – but that will all have to be in addition to what’s in the Local Plan, not instead of it – and they will certainly not be able to reduce the amount of development allowed in an area, which is what most residents will want in areas where there is significant development planned.

    The opportunies for residents’ involvement in making Local Plans will be not much different from now. Which for most people is not much.

    Tony Greaves

  • I would have thought keeping to local issues would be best. As this is a local local election I will be voting Lib Dem. Local Lib Dems have performed well in the past and never let me down. If this were a GE I would probably abstain at this point. This is an improvement from voting for someone else which would have been my position immediately post tuition fees. …

    Whilst I agree with most of the pluses mentioned, let’s not forget that VAT rise, the change to CPI for all public sector pension recipients, welfare uncertainty for many disabled people , the reported national views on the NHS Bill and of course Tuition fees. And then there are those things governing parties get the blame for whether their fault or not such as the cost of fuel, rail fares and recently the cost of a stamp!

    Once you open the national door don’t be surprised if there’s a wolf behind it…

  • I think local issues are all that is left; sorry to say. the party is neither liberal nor democratic really.

  • “Planning is set to become a bottom-up community-driven process, not the top-down imposition it’s been for far too long.”

    Only if the “community” goes along with the government’s overall planning framework! As Tony Greaves says, communities won’t be allowed to say they don’t want any more development, or they think their area is already over-developed.

  • This year the colaition is not being mentioned with the same hatred as last year by Labour folks who “lent” us their votes locally. We plug the good national bits like pensions and puil premium but focus on our local record. Lost by 27 votes in my ward due to enough people voting Labour to let the Tories in – the same could happen this year and it will be close again

  • What local involvement was there in writing the regional manifestos? As a party we need to remember localism should start with our internal democracy. Sadly, local activists are keen to play down the national and play up the local as it is. Foisting upon them a centrally created manifesto (which, upon inspection, is actually just a re-hash of coalition successes) will not improve the feeling that they are just there to prop up our parliamentarians.

    And yet again I find myself agreeing with Tony Greaves. Neighbourhood Plans are essentially bogus in practical terms. They cannot be inconsistent with the Local Plans they sit beneath and certainly do not give local people any real powers over the developments in their areas.

  • When I worked for ALDC we had very little input into “the local government election manifesto”. But that was probably fair as the “local government election manifesto” had very little to do with local government 🙂

  • coldcomfort 4th Apr '12 - 10:28am

    Golly gosh! With friends like us who needs enemies. Of course there’s a hell of a lot gone on in Government that LibDems don’t like. But just pinch yourself & remember that we only have 57 MPs against the Tories 305. Our troops have done a pretty good job & if you want a reminder of what a Tory government would do unfettered by the LibDems just read some of the stuff that emerges from the likes of David Davis MP et al & what appears in the Daily Express & similar publications from the likes of Patrick O’Flynn et al. I hate being in coalition with the Tories but there was no realistic alternative & I’m consoled by the thought that the Tories hate being in coalition with us even more.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Jeff
    Michael BG 20th Feb '24 - 1:23am: The Brexiteers thought the EU would not stick to its rules regarding trading with the UK. No rule breaking w...
  • Martin Bennett
    Entering a coalition is inherently perilous for us. In 2010 our vote was divided between convinced Lib Dems, anti-Labour voters, anti-Tory voters and protest vo...
  • Alex Macfie
    Ian Patterson: We were never even in contention in most of the Blue Wall seats we are now targeting. Previously safe Tory seats are now ultra-marginal, and that...
  • Nonconformistradical
    @Mohammed Amin Believe it or not some local objections might actually be valid. Such as a proposal to build in an area which might increase flood risk. Do yo...
  • Mohammed Amin
    I think the journalist John Rentoul deserves a trademark on QTWTAIN (questions to which the answer is no.) I have no objection to self-build for those with t...