At least the trains are running on time (Or are they?)

The news isn’t all doom ‘n’ gloom, y’know – even in the Telegraph:

Trains are more punctual than ever, Network Rail has claimed, with more than nine out of 10 arriving on time over the past year. The figures are the best since the industry started collating punctuality statistics in 1992. Last month the performance was even better than the yearly average, with 93.5 per cent of services classed as running on time. The industry’s definition of punctuality is based on commuter services operating within five minutes of the timetable and for longer distance trains, 10 minutes.

However, Lib Dem transport terrier Norman Baker isn’t jumping for joy, railing (sorry) against Network Rail’s definition of ‘on time’:

The industry considers that anything up to five minutes late, and in some cases even 10 minutes, is still on time. Many passengers will have a different view. It’s not good enough to simply record that half a million trains were within five minutes of their schedule. On time should mean on time.”

Norman has a point, especially for long-distance journeys which may involve connections – and where a train running 10 minutes’ late can make all the difference. That said, and assuming Network Rail’s definitions have remained constant over time, it can’t be denied that the figures do signal (sorry, again) genuine sevice improvement.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

7 Comments

  • Absolutely LibCync, some journeys now take longer than they did 30 years ago solely because of padding.

  • I have the detailed figures on padding, and they are grim. The citizen’s charter has a lot to answer for!

  • tim leunig,

    please supply the details – or at least a link.

    just to explain – the statistics are based on arrival at destination, so the last few miles of a journey can be “padded” to help the statistics

    For example: Holyhead to Valley (start of journey) takes 6-7 minutes; in the other direction trains are allowed 12 minutes. Arriva Trains Wales services starting from Cardiff are allowed 14 minutes to Newport; southbound [i.e. reaching their destination] they’re allowed 17-22 minutes.

    Perhaps Norman Baker could ask if the DfT has made any assessment of any changes in the practice of “padding” over recent years?

  • “it can’t be denied that the figures do signal (sorry, again) genuine sevice improvement”

    Actually it could. All these stats show is that more trains are within 5 minutes late than before. But what it doesn’t show is what has happened to all the other trains that were already within 5 minutes late. For instance, a train that before was on average only 1 minute late, could now be 4 minutes late on average. So while less trains are over 5 minutes late, the average train could actually be later than before.

    This is certainly a possibility, though obviously we’ll probably never know, but the fact they’ve dressed their statistics up the way they have doesn’t bode well. And it’s not a huge stretch to imagine it happening, considering a similar principle is behind the Labour drive to get NHS waiting times down below a certain level.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Peter Watson
    @Tim Hill "The Liberal Democrat national position is irrelevant to the by-election." Why? Are the 2019 manifesto and any prior conference votes redundant now?...
  • Thomas Smith
    @David Raw One can be for high speed rail links, including HS2, without necessarily being good with how it is actually being managed and made in reality. In r...
  • John Littler
    Look at the direction of the world. Biden won by 5-6 million votes ( Clinton beat Trump by 3m ) and is enacting a massive programme of Greening and good works. ...
  • John Littler
    I used to support HS2 in the manner that any rail infrastructure has to be good, but examination of the facts show it to be uniquely bad. High speeds and eno...
  • Joe Bourke
    International law and the rules based international order are not synonymous terms and are subject to widely differing interpretations. The rules based interna...