Alex Foster

Attention local party officers!

By | Tue 12th December 2006 - 1:51 pm

Just a quick reminder to the good people out there running Lib Dem local parties that the deadline for returning forms to HQ detailing next years officers, conference reps and regional conference reps is fast approaching.

The forms were sent to local party officers earlier in the year, and have to be back by the 15th December. What with Christmas posting times, if you haven’t done yours already, please sit down and do it right now! (I know I am!)

Once all the forms are received in Cowley Street, the next mammoth job begins. The thousands of changes need to be recorded in the central database by a small army of volunteers. Just Officers and Conference Reps are some 6,500 pieces of data, each of which needs to be changed manually.

Late forms do genuinely create problems for the poor administrators. They can delay mailings and inconvenience your conference reps. If you have new blood amongst your team, you put your brand new officers and representatives at a disadvantage if HQ can’t mail them quickly enough with conference details.

If you can help input the data by turning up in Westminster with your willing typing fingers, or if you need to check whether your local party has got its forms in, you can e-mail [email protected] or phone the switchboard in Cowley Street on 020 7222 7999.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in Party policy and internal matters.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Arthur Trussell
    Layla Moran....
  • cim
    @Nick Baird The other thing about Davey's popularity ratings as leader is that, yes, he was generally more net popular than Starmer or until recently Badenoch ...
  • Peter Wrigley
    @David Allen. Thank you for alerting us to Roz Savage's excellent post. That, and the subsequent comments, show that the party's anoraks are well aware of what...
  • Meg Thomas
    I agree that Ed should be supportive and grown up about Andy Burnham's sensible suggestion of more cooperation between parties. we agree with Labour on plenty ...
  • David Le Grice
    Throwing one's hands up and saying that voters always had trouble knowing what we stand for is really missing the wood for the trees. As a smaller party that's ...