The Bradford Telegraph & Argus reports:
Four Conservative party supporters from Bradford tried to rig the voting system in the run-up to a General Election in a plot to “harvest” postal votes, a court heard today.
Mohammed Sultan, Mohammed Rafiq, Reis Khan and Jamshed Khan sent off for postal voting applications under false names or had legitimate applications re-directed to them, Leeds Crown Court heard.
Their aim was to get “their man” Haroon Rashid, 39, elected to the Bradford West seat in the 2005 General Election, said prosecutor Mark Ainsworth.
Earlier this year, Haroon Rashid was cleared of conspiracy to defraud whilst the then trial of the other four was ordered to be restarted as they were unhappy with their legal representation.
Although it is likely that the trial will now be concluded before the next general election, that is only because we are in a five-year Parliament. Moreover, the original police arrests were made in May 2005.
Whatever the result of the case, that is an uncomfortably slow legal process – both because of the risk of charges hanging over innocent people for years but also because of the risk of having a further general election before allegations arising from the previous one have been resolved.
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Recipe for a real change of direction
Day 9304: So Farewell Then, Kier Starmer
Personality matters in politics: Starmer's lack of one did for him
How many councillors has Reform UK lost since the May 2026 elections?
National politicians should keep their noses out of the decision-making processes of local councillors
Mick Taylor
Ynys Mon Man
Tim Rogers
Nonconformistradical
Jana
3 Comments
“uncomfortably slow” is very diplomatic language to use, especially when standards in public life are at the forefront of the public consciousness and this is bringing our democratic system into disrepute.
Where the letter of the law isn’t being upheld the people in the responsible roles need to be seen to be publicly accountable for the reasons, otherwise they stand accused of crossing into the political arena – which we have seen recently is a sackable offence.
*letter and spirit of the law
It’s a pathetic display. What explanations have been given for this poor performance in bringing these matters to trial?