Can you guess who said what?

Take two people: one a successful female businesswoman and one a male Tory MP.

Then take two public statements: one calling female Cabinet members “an ugly bunch” and “I could not look at them”; the other calling for companies to be better at ending the male dominance of the boardroom.

Who do you think would have said which…?

As you may have guessed from the fact that I’ve asked the question… it was the male Tory MP (David Cameron) echoing previous calls from the likes of Vince Cable and Lynne Featherstone for changes in company boardrooms, and it was Mary Portas saying such delightful things about successful female politicians.

In related news today, the Financial Reporting Council announced changes in the way firms report on their activities:

The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) today announces its decision to amend the UK Corporate Governance Code to strengthen the principle on boardroom diversity which was first introduced into the Code in June 2010.

The amendments the FRC is announcing today will require listed companies to report annually on their boardroom diversity policy, including gender, and on any measurable objectives that the board has set for implementing the policy and the progress it had made in achieving the objectives. The FRC will also update the Code to include the diversity of the board, including gender, as one of the factors to be considered when evaluating its effectiveness.

The current revised Code, which came into effect in June 2010, included for the first time a principle recognising the value of diversity in the boardroom, which states that, “The search for board candidates should be conducted, and appointments made, on merit, against objective criteria and will due regard for the benefits of diversity on the board, including gender”…

Baroness Hogg, Chairman of the Financial Reporting Council, said: “The changes we made to the Code last year reflected the FRC’s view that gender diversity strengthens board effectiveness by reducing the risk of “groupthink”, making fuller use of the talent pool and keeping companies in touch with their customers. The changes we are announcing today, which were strongly supported in our consultation, will reinforce the Code’s principles by requiring companies to report on measurable objectives and progress in this important area.”

It’s worth emphasising the points in Baroness Hogg’s quote as they’re often missed in more populist reporting of this issue: these sorts of moves are not only widely supported within industry, but one of the reasons they are widely supported is the growing range of evidence that more diverse boards make for better run companies.

Read more by or more about , , , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

5 Comments

  • Rachel Coleman Finch 12th Oct '11 - 9:25am

    Tris: the concern is that discrimination, whether conscious or unconscious, means we aren’t actually getting “the best” in the boardroom or in parliament, just more people who are similar to those already in power.

    Unconscious bias is everywhere, and an example is the way that female politicians are criticised far more for their looks than male ones, and usually ahead of criticising them for their policies.

  • “FRC’s view that gender diversity strengthens board effectiveness by reducing the risk of “groupthink”, making fuller use of the talent pool and keeping companies in touch with their customers.”

    Similar sorts of things were said about increasing the number of women in Parliament – that it would improve debate, things would be less hostile and confrontational etc. I can’t say I’ve noticed since 1997. Groupthink doesn’t disappear if you have people with the same attitudes of backgrounds just of different genders.

    That’s not to say there isn’t a point here – or that it needs addressing. But I think to suggest that things will somehow be magically better if there are more women on company boards is very optimistic.

  • Mark, does everything Lib Dems say nowadays have to include an jibe at the Tories? (even if in jest). The misogynist and racist Tory MP stereotype is getting a bit stale.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • David Evans
    Indeed Martin and Lorenzo are correct and many of the points they make are very accurate. To which I would add just one. For more than 50 years we have been...
  • David Garlick
    Well said. To others I urge them to take a breath and to think things through. Certainly past the next year or two. Events are not in the Governmnets favour...
  • David Garlick
    so soory to read the histerical stuff still being sent to the slow and sure progress Ed is making. We should have expected the terrible defeats we have suffere...
  • Andy Daer
    First, this article is excellent and raises many important issues. Democracy is clearly 'fragile' but we should first ask ourselves what 'democracy' actually m...
  • Richard Underhill..
    Nissan car company is staying in the UK because of the EU deal, most of their vehicles are exported into the EU. Components for other companies such as VW, Aud...