Channel S fined £40,000 for LibDem Advert

Ofcom have announced that Channel S World Limited, Channel S Plus Limited and Channel S Global Limited have been fined a total of £40,000 for breaching the TV Advertising Code by repeatedly broadcasting a political advertisement.

The Bengali stations aired an advert 44 times during April this year urging people to “Vote Brian Paddick for Mayoral candidate, and Jalal for GLA candidate…”

Ofcom concluded that the material was in breach of the following Sections of the TV Advertising Code:
4(a), which prohibits advertisements by or on behalf of any body whose objects are of a political nature; and
4(b), which prohibits advertisements that are directed toward a political end.

Ofcom considered this to be a very serious breach of the Code and a flagrant breach of the statutory ban on political advertising. In Ofcom’s experience, no broadcaster has ever transmitted an advertisement that has been inserted by a body whose objects are so political in nature and so obviously directed at a political end.

The full findings can be read here. However it is unclear who from the Liberal Democrats requested the free adverts.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

4 Comments

  • It’s such a blatant breach, I think we can be pretty sure it wasn’t someone from Cowley St who approached Channel S…

  • Hywel Morgan 10th Dec '08 - 8:19pm

    Interestingly Tom the Communications act 2003 (the relevant piece of legislation) is one of the few bits of legislation to be passed without a declaration from the Secretary of State that it is compatible with the ECHR.

    This whole issue was considered by the House of Lords fairly recently
    http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2008/15.html

    It will probably all need reviewing again in the light of new digital media as Chris suggests – in particular the issue of adverts on TV shows on “on demand” services like 4OD and BBC iPlayer.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Chris Webb
    There are clearly more Tonbridge One-Nation types in the South than the North, but if one characterises them as evidence-based, internationalist, caring and tho...
  • paul barker
    If we want to seem relevant to young Voters Labour have given us a couple of good opportunities with the proposal to cut benefits for the under-25s & the w...
  • Chris Webb
    Welcome Cody; “wetter than a Dogger Bank trawler” they said, not realising that even by then such craft were rarities. I left once they failed for a second ...
  • Mick Taylor
    Referenda/Referendums?? How typical of LibDems to argue about semantics rather than the substantive point....
  • Mick Taylor
    @Andrew Tampion. As the current UK constitution (unwritten) stands, then yes. You can't have one rule for things you like and another for things you don't like....