Channel S fined £40,000 for LibDem Advert

Ofcom have announced that Channel S World Limited, Channel S Plus Limited and Channel S Global Limited have been fined a total of £40,000 for breaching the TV Advertising Code by repeatedly broadcasting a political advertisement.

The Bengali stations aired an advert 44 times during April this year urging people to “Vote Brian Paddick for Mayoral candidate, and Jalal for GLA candidate…”

Ofcom concluded that the material was in breach of the following Sections of the TV Advertising Code:
4(a), which prohibits advertisements by or on behalf of any body whose objects are of a political nature; and
4(b), which prohibits advertisements that are directed toward a political end.

Ofcom considered this to be a very serious breach of the Code and a flagrant breach of the statutory ban on political advertising. In Ofcom’s experience, no broadcaster has ever transmitted an advertisement that has been inserted by a body whose objects are so political in nature and so obviously directed at a political end.

The full findings can be read here. However it is unclear who from the Liberal Democrats requested the free adverts.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

4 Comments

  • It’s such a blatant breach, I think we can be pretty sure it wasn’t someone from Cowley St who approached Channel S…

  • Hywel Morgan 10th Dec '08 - 8:19pm

    Interestingly Tom the Communications act 2003 (the relevant piece of legislation) is one of the few bits of legislation to be passed without a declaration from the Secretary of State that it is compatible with the ECHR.

    This whole issue was considered by the House of Lords fairly recently
    http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2008/15.html

    It will probably all need reviewing again in the light of new digital media as Chris suggests – in particular the issue of adverts on TV shows on “on demand” services like 4OD and BBC iPlayer.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Nigel Jones
    @Vince, your nuanced approach makes some sense and as you say it is a complicated situation. If we get gas from the Jackdaw field and not importing it, does tha...
  • Nigel Jones
    I agee with your main argument. We do not need to support many pensioners with the triple lock and those who are poor should be provided for in another way. I ...
  • Jana
    Two seats where Restore standing has probably cost Reform gains. If this becomes an ongoing pattern, Farage may have to swallow his pride and do a deal with Res...
  • Chris Bowers
    Thank you to everyone who commented on my post, even if, by the end, the responses had drifted into the realm of comments-about-comments-about-comments. I think...
  • Chris Perry
    What the Prime Minister actually said was that if a prices link or 2.5% did not keep up with earnings over time the government would correct it. But that would ...