Clegg – Lib Dem stealth bomber?

Yesterday’s Indy published an interesting account of the findings of ‘private polling for the Liberal Democrats’ under the flattering headline, Is the invisible Clegg a secret weapon for the Lib Dems?

The research was scarcely earth-shattering, but there were some interesting conclusions:

On Nick Clegg:

The research concluded that Mr Clegg was the Liberal Democrats’ best asset even though he is unknown to many voters. The party’s strategy in the new year will be based on giving him as high a profile as possible. Women, who like him more than men do, regard the Liberal Democrat leader as “nice-looking, presentable, personable and likeable”, according to the research. Among men, he is viewed as “down-to-earth” and “someone I could relate to”. People saw his body language as “in control” and “welcoming”.

On Gordon Brown:

Despite Mr Brown’s experience on the economy and recent recovery in the opinion polls, people regard him as “old”, “dull”, “tired” and “boring”, according to a Liberal Democrat summary of its polling. Voters reacted sceptically when the Prime Minister tried to “feel their pain” by speaking about rising prices at the petrol pump and supermarket check-out. Some pointed out that Mr Brown does not drive, and his remarks contributed to a feeling that he was out of touch with ordinary people.

On David Cameron:

Mr Cameron is seen by many voters as young and energetic and as bringing dynamism to an old-fashioned party. But they believe he looks “too posh” to be “one of us”. Some voters said he was rather lightweight and not experienced enough to be prime minister. … The focus groups suggest that, contrary to rumours in the Westminster village, people do not confuse Mr Clegg with Mr Cameron. The Liberal Democrat leader is seen as more forceful and authoritative without being “posh”.

Three things to note, it seems to me:

First, when it comes to public perceptions of Nick’s performance as Lib Dem leader there’s still all to play for. As YouGov’s Peter Kellner noted in the review of the year for the party,

A third of the electorate don’t have an opinion of Nick Clegg,” says Mr Kellner. “He’s simply not made much of an impact for good or ill on great number of voters.”

You can read that a couple of ways: negatively (why the hell hasn’t Nick made an impact?), or positively (he still has the chance to win folk over). And as all Lib Dem leaders have trouble gaining the media spotlight before they’ve had the chance to fight an election – I can recall the mutterings against both Paddy and Charles before their first campaigns – it seems fair to cut Nick some slack.

Secondly, though this is private polling for the party – and so will be greeted with some scepticism by those who’ve not had chance to see the raw data from the party’s focus groups – the findings are noticeably similar to those reported by BBC2’s Newsnight last September. Again, these showed that when voters get to see Nick in action, they warm to him personally, and to the message of the party he conveys.

Thirdly, I was pretty intrigued that the party appears, at least reading between the lines of the Indy report, to have been asking its focus groups whether Nick has been put in the shade by his deputy, the Lib Dems’ shadow chancellor, Vince Cable:

Nor has Mr Clegg been eclipsed by Vince Cable, the party’s Treasury spokesman, who has won plaudits for his performance on the economy and for predicting the personal debt crisis and housing bubble. Among ordinary voters, it seems, Mr Clegg is better known than Mr Cable.

Nothing wrong with asking the question, of course. Indeed, it would probably be remiss of the party to gather a focus group together, and not take the opportunity to ask some tough questions. But interesting nonetheless. For the record, I think we should be doing much more in all party publicity material to show Nick and Vince – ‘Energy and Experience’ – wedded at the hip from now until whenever the general election is.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in News.


  • On the last point about ‘Energy and Experience’, as i said a while ago on this blog, Cable and Clegg should run as a kind of US-style President/Vice-President ticket at the next election, as they complement each other well in a way that neither Brown/Darling (if the latter is still in his job) nor Cameron/Osborne (ditto) do. It may be unorthodox, and some may say that it’s not how things are done, but i think we could rebutt that criticism easily by pointing to the centrality of economic competence to any government – especially at the present time.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Robin Stafford
    Christmas lunch today with 18-20 friends in a target seat. Mostly traditional Torys and they know my politics. Overall view? Who is Ed Davey and what do LibDems...
  • Nonconformistradical
    @Tom Harney How would you define ready? What are your smart objectives - you’ll need those to define ready?...
  • Tom Harney
    My opinion is that when talking about a General Election almost the only thing we can control is whether the party is ready for it....
  • Peter Hirst
    We are all mentally healthy at birth. What is needed is some basic knowledge about how our minds work and what can go wrong with them. It is even more important...
  • Peter Hirst
    What do our focus groups tell us assuming we still hold them? I think people want hope and to have that we need to rebuild our infrastructure. We don't need to ...