Clegg makes “impressive” debut at despatch box as DPM, sets out radical political reform plans

Nick Clegg debuted in front of the House of Commons today in his new role (yes, it is still new: it’s only a month since the election) as deputy prime minister. And he used the occasion to set out how the new coalition government will make good the political reforms radical political reform plans that languished neglected during Labour’s 13 years in government. The government’s plans include:

    * A referendum on the Alternative Vote
    * The right to recall MPs who break the rules
    * Fewer, more equal-sized constituencies
    * Making the House of Lords wholly or largely elected
    * Fixed five-year parliaments
    * Devolving greater powers to the Scottish Parliament by implementing the recommendations of the Calman Commission
    * A referendum on devolving more powers to the Welsh Assembly

Nick Clegg’s website excerpts parts of his speech, reproduced below. But if that’s not enough for you then you can read the full debate exchange courtesy of Hansard here.

Political website is full of praise for Nick’s performance – while noting, fairly enough, that these honeymoon months will be the easy ones for the Lib Dems and the rest of the government:

Plans for a referendum on electoral reform, legislation to create an elected Upper House, and the government’s controversial plans to secure fixed term Parliaments, all met with howls of Labour anguish and an early call for the deputy prime minister to “get off his high horse”. Clegg, whose debut performance appeared to be nerve-free, gave as good as he got. … when pressed on the need for urgency over plans to cut the number of MPs, Clegg repeated what we can expect to be a frequently used come-back: “You had 13 years. We’ve only had three weeks.”

It’s an argument that stacks up well for now, and the glum expressions on the Labour benches – led by an out of sorts Jack Straw, whose mammoth speech soon lost all sides of the House – suggest that it’s one that isn’t easy to answer. … He’ll have enjoyed this, and, given the negative reception which welcomed him, Clegg might think that there’ll be easy days to come.

However, at the start of this coalition government’s life, and with the open goal hit of New Labour’s latter years of constitutional foot-dragging, Clegg is having it easy. New Politics has Clegg bounding for now, but he will know that without visible progress it – and he – will soon begin to look as tired as the old lot.

Here’s the excerpts of the first speech by a Lib Dem deputy prime minister:

We all share a single ambition: to restore people’s faith in their politics and their politicians. This government’s plans will do just that. Because our programme turns a page: On governments that hoard power. On parliaments that look inwards rather than outwards. On widespread disengagement amongst people who feel locked out of the decisions that affect their everyday lives. So this is a moment when we have a real opportunity to change our politics for good…

…This government is determined that no government should be able to play politics with the dates of a General Election. Parliamentary terms should be fixed for five years. So we need a new right for parliament to request a dissolution, taking away the Prime Minister’s traditional right to call an election when he or she wishes…

…We plan to strengthen the Scottish Parliament and the Welsh Assembly too, implementing recommendations from the Calman Commission’s Final Report.

And, equally, Wales will get a referendum on further devolution. A decision that will be taken by the Welsh people…

…It’s time to finish what was started three years ago in the cross party talks on party funding. Every party has had its own problems, but we all now have an opportunity to draw a line under them. So we’ll seize that opportunity – we will pursue a detailed agreement on limiting donations and reforming party funding in order to remove big money from politics for good…

…We will bring forward legislation to ensure that, where it has been proven that an MP has been engaged in serious wrongdoing…Their constituents will have the right to organise a petition to force a by-election. When people have been let down by their MP in that way, they must not be made to wait until the next election to cast their judgement…

…The power of recall is just one of a range of reforms intended to shift power directly to the British people. We also want people to be able to initiate debates here in the Commons through public petitions. We want a new public reading stage for bills. We want people to be able to instigate local referenda on issues that matter to their neighbourhoods. And, we want people to decide directly if they want to change the system by which they elect their MPs, which is why there will be a referendum on AV, and I will be announcing the date of that referendum in due course…

…It should be up to the British people to elect their second chamber. To that end, I want to announce the following: One: I have now set up a committee, which I will chair, to take forward this reform, composed of members from all three major political parties, as well as from both Houses. Two: it will be explicitly charged with producing a draft bill by no later than the end of this year. The first time legislation for an elected second chamber will have ever been published… I will not hide my impatience for reforms that are more than a hundred years overdue.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Parliament.


  • David Boothroyd 7th Jun '10 - 9:42pm

    Was it such a good debut? What about his gaffe about the Welsh devolution referendum when he said that the Government would be supporting a ‘Yes’ vote? This wasn’t true and he’s just had to “correct” himself.

  • Richard Hill 7th Jun '10 - 9:56pm

    I trust Nick and I am backing Nick.

  • Chris Mills 7th Jun '10 - 10:15pm

    @David yes there was a mistake.

    How many ministers have made similar mistakes before. Quite a few, I’m sure.

    For the number of times he had to give way, and for his first speech from the ballot box, he did OK.

  • Getting a public telling off from Cameron isn’t good. I’m not sure if I like this “MPs must stay netural” lark I would have been happier if they’d just said that Nick had a slip and he mean’t to say that HE supported the “Yes” vote rather then speaking for the whole government. As this way does kind of make him look like he’s been neutered.

    Part from that all good stuff. 🙂

  • Deliberate ‘mistake’? I wonder what Welsh voters now think of Clegg that he is fighting for greater powers…

  • I should hasten to add that it was probably a mistake…

  • A mixed session for Nick I felt but as the reform agenda is clarified he will become stronger.Not sure fewer MPs is desirable or if it helps us.

  • Anthony Aloysius St 8th Jun '10 - 12:30am

    Life is full of surprises! Who’s have thought Nick Clegg would be having to extract a foot from his mouth after his first session at the despatch box? And who’d have thought LDV would omit all mention of the blunder? (I’m reminded of the old joke about historical leaders expressing envious admiration of the achievements of the Soviet Union, Napoleon’s line being, “With a newspaper like Pravda, no one would ever have heard of Waterloo!”)

  • Paul McKeown 8th Jun '10 - 1:24am

    Thought NC was a bit off form today to be honest, bit ragged. Things will get easier, though, later, after the budget. He should be able to concentrate more fully on the reform agenda then. Looking forward to good things from our man!

  • The gaffe was an excellent idea. Showed a clear preference for what we as Lib Dems want to do. It is remarkably small-minded to think that anyone cares that he seems to have gone around some idea that he has to pretend to be neutral. No one cares about these silly issues of procedure or convention. The point is the substance, and we like it.

  • Peter Laubach 8th Jun '10 - 1:37pm

    A Scotnat MP rose to say how disgraceful it was that there weren’t any representatives from the minor parties on the new committee and I thought he had a valid point – surely on such fundamental changes there should be the widest possible input and I would have thought Nick would have agreed.

  • Andrea Gill 8th Jun '10 - 1:53pm

    @Peter – IMHO where Scotland and Wales are concerned then yes their input is important, but if we are to give them both more independence then surely we can’t expect THEM to decide on our new political structure?

  • George Kendall 8th Jun '10 - 7:00pm

    I like most of what Nick is proposing, but I’m uneasy about reducing the number of MPs, unless they first cut the number of ministers.
    Currently, a majority government has to keep a sizeable number of backbenchers happy, or it risks losing legislation to rebellions.
    If the payroll vote stays the same, but the number of MPs is to be reduced, it will give too much power to the government.

  • Peter Laubach 8th Jun '10 - 7:37pm

    Andrea, isn’t ‘our’ (England’s?) structure still part of ‘theirs’ as well until we have a fully federal system? I for one would certainly approve of that in principle, though it would clearly be a step too far for the Conservatives!

  • david thorpe 9th Jun '10 - 2:25pm

    great speach by nick but the harder tests are still in the future and this coaliton will be judged soleley on the economy

  • His first DEputy PM Question Time in the H of Commons clashes with England’s final world cup group game.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Martin Gray
    Ultimately - you cannot sustain the current levels of immigration, & solve the housing crisis simultaneously...Sadly too many progressives are infatuated wi...
  • Nonconformistradical
    "Blaming them for promising amenities (to get planning permission) that they then find endless excuses to delay, however…" A key issue and the one which resu...
  • Joe Bourke
    The Renew Europe demand that the EU Council and Commission take responsibility and finally take further steps to apply Article 7, which could lead to the remova...
  • Cassie
    @Simon R – “I don’t think we can blame developers for building the houses they think they can most easily sell for a profit.” I, for one, wasn't blamin...
  • Joe Bourke
    Vernon Bogdanor has an interesting analysis of the rise of the Reform party in contrast with the SDP of the 1980s