The Voice

Coalition Government’s torture inquiry keeps Lib Dem manifesto pledge, spells “end to Labour’s shameful legacy on human rights”

By | Tue 6th July 2010 - 6:15 pm

The Guardian reports:

David Cameron today announced a judicial inquiry into Britain’s role in torture and rendition since the al-Qaida attacks of September 2001. … it would be expected to conclude its investigations with 12 months. …

A three-person inquiry panel will be headed by Sir Peter Gibson, a former appeal court judge who is currently commissioner for the intelligence services. He will be assisted by Dame Janet Paraskeva, the head of the civil service commissioners, and Peter Riddell, the former Times political commentator who is now a senior fellow at the Institute for Government.

Most of the inquiry will be held in secret, but victims of torture and their representatives will be able to give evidence during open sessions, as will representatives of human rights groups.

The Coalition Government’s move was welcomed by Lib Dem MP Tom Brake, Co-Chair of the Liberal Democrat Parliamentary Committee for Home Affairs, Justice and Equality, who commented:

At long last we can hope to see an end to Labour’s shameful legacy on human rights. This Inquiry will be the coalition Government’s opportunity to get to the bottom of what are very serious allegations levelled at our security services.

“From Iraq to accusations of Government complicity in torture, Labour has left Britain’s international reputation in tatters.

“Hopefully, the implementation of this key Liberal Democrat manifesto pledge, with access to all relevant material and people, will start the process of restoring Britain’s standing in the world.”

The Lib Dems were the only party to make it a manifesto pledge to hold an inquiry into allegations of British Government complicity in torture.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

3 Comments

  • Andrew Suffield 6th Jul '10 - 7:19pm

    It’s a start. It’s going to take more than a secret inquiry though. We know that the civil service spooks just classify anything embarrassing until after they’ve retired, while making up excuses about “protecting national security” (meaning their job security). We need the government to stop letting the civil service tell it what to do, and to let a court declassify all the not-really-secret material and prosecute those responsible.

  • Ian 7th Jul '10 - 5:03am

    Labour’s shameful legacy on HR? Like the HRA? Nice yougov poll today, though.

  • paul 7th Jul '10 - 1:59pm

    the next time a tyrant from china or saudi arabia swans in to london i’ll be interested to see how nick and dave react.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Peter Davies
    Those words at the beginning of the declaration were pretty disingenuous. It was obvious even at the time that they were incompatible with the rest of the decla...
  • TimL
    Thanks Alex and Chloe. FWIW I don't think these are resignation honours - I think it is just timing coincidence. Whether Starmer comes back with more resignatio...
  • Simon McGrath
    Oh dear. The UK is actually doing quite well for AI firms and investment here - would the state taking over some of the shares make that more or less likely to...
  • Simon McGrath
    Ironic that the first comment is anti semitic conspiracy theory. Alex missed out the part of the Balfour declaration "it being clearly understood that nothing...
  • David Raw
    I've often wondered what P.M. David Lloyd George's motives were, both personally as and politically, when he supported the Balfour Declaration. I do know he was...