Commons votes to allow Twitter but MP demands minister communicates via letter

Yesterday Parliament voted by 206-63 to allow MPs to (continue to) tweet from the Chamber, by rejecting an amendment that would have gutted this proposal, subsequently passed:

That this House notes the Third Report from the Procedure Committee on Use of hand-held electronic devices in the Chamber and committees, HC 889; and resolves that hand-held devices (not laptops) may be used in the Chamber, provided that they are silent, and used in a way that does not impair decorum, that Members making speeches in the Chamber or in committee may refer to electronic devices in place of paper speaking notes and that electronic devices, including laptops, may be used silently in committee meetings, including select committees.

Not all the moves in Parliament yesterday however were in favour of embracing technology, for there was also this exchange:

Mr Denis MacShane (Rotherham) (Lab): On a point of order, Mr Deputy Speaker. Along with other right hon. and hon. Members, I received today a letter from the Minister of State, Department for Work and Pensions, the right hon. Member for Epsom and Ewell (Chris Grayling), saying that in future all his communications with us would be by e-mail. I do not challenge the sincerity of his desire not to spend an evening signing letters, or to be quicker or save a bit of paper, but I really do think it is a worry. When we send letters on to constituents, they should not be PDFs or bits of e-mails; they should be letters. They represent an important relationship between the state and the citizen. I am not sure, either, of the legal authority of letters that have not been physically signed. I do not want to add work for Ministers—believe me, I know what it is like—but will you look at the matter with your colleagues, perhaps including the Leader of the House, who is kindly in his seat, and work out whether it is a good initiative for any Minister to take?

Mr Deputy Speaker (Mr Lindsay Hoyle):That was discussed at Speaker’s conference this morning, and Mr Speaker is certainly uneasy about it. Concern was expressed by the other Deputy Speakers, as well. I can say that Mr Speaker will investigate the matter.

The 63 (plus two tellers) who voted against were:

Aldous, Peter; Amess, Mr David; Bebb, Guto; Bell, Sir Stuart; Brady, Mr Graham; Brine, Mr Steve; Buckland, Mr Robert; Burns, Conor; Cairns, Alun; Campbell, Mr Alan; Clark, Katy; Corbyn, Jeremy; Davidson, Mr Ian; Davies, Philip; de Bois, Nick; Docherty, Thomas; Dunne, Mr Philip; Eustice, George; Fallon, Michael; Francois, rh Mr Mark; Freeman, George; Fuller, Richard; Goodman, Helen; Goodwill, Mr Robert; Gray, Mr James; Hamilton, Mr David; Hart, Simon; Henderson, Gordon; Hendrick, Mark; Hinds, Damian; Hollobone, Mr Philip; Hughes, rh Simon; Jackson, Mr Stewart; Jones, Mr Kevan; Jones, Mr Marcus; Kaufman, rh Sir Gerald; Kawczynski, Daniel; Lewis, Dr Julian; Llwyd, rh Mr Elfyn; Main, Mrs Ann;e Maynard, Paul; Pincher, Christopher; Reevell, Simon; Rifkind, rh Sir Malcolm; Rosindell, Andrew; Ruffley, Mr David; Russell, Bob; Selous, Andrew; Sharma, Alok; Sheridan, Jim; Skinner, Mr Dennis; Soubry, Anna; Stewart, Iain; Swales, Ian; Swayne, rh Mr Desmond; Syms, Mr Robert; Turner, Mr Andrew; Tyrie, Mr Andrew; Watkinson, Angela; Whittingdale, Mr John; Williamson, Gavin; Wilson, Sammy; Wood, Mike; Tellers for the Ayes: Mr Charles Walker and Mr Roger Gale.

Kelvin Hopkins was also recorded as voting both for and against.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News and Online politics.


  • Well there are plenty of rules concerning when something can be deemed to have been signed – not least when court proceedings are issued electronically.

    When is a letter from a Minister to an MP regarding a constituent legally significant though? I can think of numerous examples when I’ve seen replies relating to legal or quasi-legal (if there is such a thing) situations but I never thought the letters themselves would carry any legal weight.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarAlex Macfie 5th Jun - 5:10pm
    David Raw: Sorry for missing out the first "n" in "an urban"; that was a typo. The lack of an Edit feature in this blog...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 5th Jun - 5:05pm
    Careful, Alex. Mr Marriott, Sir, will tell you off for forgetting a consonant before a vowel........ and forgetting the 'ein' in the sentence. Ich bin...
  • User AvatarAlex Macfie 5th Jun - 4:51pm
    John Marriott: I think that Berliner story is a urban myth. The Berliners would have understood what he meant, namely that he was an ally...
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 5th Jun - 4:31pm
    Adrian, any business planning a new product launch and rebranding needs to take on the lessons of New Coke,nearly%20century%2Dold%20secret%20formula. For a political party rebranding...
  • User Avatarexpats 5th Jun - 4:08pm
    The evangelicals and right wing in the US will forgive Trump anything (and I mean anything).... When challenged about Trump's lewd comments about women (details...
  • User AvatarAdrian May 5th Jun - 3:53pm
    I would like to thank all those who commented on the article. The fact that much of the comments involved detailed discussion of events and...