Iain Dale: So the Tories are backing the government’s plans for the Post Office and Jack Straw’s decision to block publication of the Iraq war cabinet minutes. It’s probably just as well I have been too busy today to do much blogging.
Dizzy Thinks: I thought I would just pass a quick comment on Jack Straw’s decision to veto the Information Commissioner on the issue of Cabinet minutes on the decision to go to war in Iraq. Firstly, the Tories are bloody idiots to support the Government on this…
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Jane Dodds to step down as Welsh Lib Dem Leader (Caron Lindsay)
The silent scandal of ME…and in praise of Tessa Munt (Paul Walter)
The Lib Dems should be bolder. Here’s how…. (James Hill)
Before we talk about coalition, we must ask: What are the Liberal Democrats for? (Maria Linforth-Hall)
Support to enable Disabled People to live Independently (Richard Whelan)
Senior Reform official casts doubt over legality of huge donations
Turning Point UK chief executive suspended by Tories over contract killing claims
Queen Mary did not request the Agatha Christie radio play that became The Mousetrap
The Stone Roses: Waterfall
Dog owner fined after man bitten on penis
More ministerial dissent over Labour's immigration policies
Peter Davies 
Peter Wrigley 
James Hill James Hill James Hill 
2 Comments
David Howarth isn’t arguing that Cabinet minutes should always be published, is he?
So LibDem opposition to Jack Straw’s Iraq veto must be based on the specifics of this case.
David Howarth says “The decision to go to war in Iraq was momentous, controversial and disastrous, especially for this country’s reputation as an upholder of international law.”
But why should these Cabinet minutes be an exception to the confidentiality of Cabinet discussions?
Not a point wholly without merit. It really needs a reading of the Information Commissioner’s decision that there were public interest grounds to publish them.
It is indicative of something that Jack Straw chose not to challenge whether the Information Commissioner/Tribunal had made a correct decision in law but to use his veto powers