Crewe & Nantwich: what the result is looking like

The Voice’s Lib Dem sources are saying it is likely to be Conservative 45-50% range, Labour 25-30% and Liberal Democrats 15-20% range, which is in line with what’s been said elsewhere. Big Conservative win, massive drop in the Labour vote, Liberal Democrat vote little changed from the general election.

First verdicts: good news for the Conservatives, bad news for Labour as the defeat will be at the grimmest end of their predictions, and relief for Liberal Democrats that the London elections style two-party squeeze has been avoided.

UPDATE: We hear party is expecting about an 8% swing from Labour to Liberal Democrats. At a general election, such a swing would deliver around 20 gains.

ELECTORAL TRIVIA UPDATE: An 8% swing from Labour to the Liberal Democrats at the next general election would deliver Birmingham Hall Green as a Liberal Democrat gain. The current MP for Hall Green in Steve McCabe, the man in charge of Labour’s Crewe & Nantwich campaign.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Parliamentary by-elections.


  • Very big turnout at 58.2%

  • 8% swing Lab -> Lib? Now that’s not the standard calculation of swing, I’m sure, it usually involves parties in 1st and 2nd…!

  • Iain Roberts 23rd May '08 - 9:31am

    @Kevin Davis: except, of course, that Lab/Con typically get squeezed a lot more than 4% when they’re in third place in a by-election.

  • Mark Williams 23rd May '08 - 2:09pm

    Spot on, although as usual the LibDEm aspiration is overstated.

  • If we overstate by enough then by the time it’s been ignored and watered down in the press, we might just about be treated fairly and seen for what we are.

  • It was a bad result for the Lib Dems, as it seemed we had a good candidate, lots of effort and our vote went down.

    We need to start working out how we can do better otherwise we won’t do better.

    In the euro elections last time we got 14% ? on the same day as we got 27% in the local elections – it’s awful and the party ought to be doing something to stop it happening again, instead we had the (to the public) incomprehensible we support a referendum, just not this one lunacy.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarKatharine Pindar 9th Jul - 1:29am
    The sad scandal of the unprotected care homes in which so many have died before their natural time will not be put right by any...
  • User AvatarMike Jay 9th Jul - 12:26am
    The article in "The Australian" that Peter referred to is behind a paywall. However, the article is freely available at
  • User AvatarMike Jay 8th Jul - 11:28pm
    I'm reminded of my undergraduate days back in the 1960s. The students' union repeatedly passed motions demanding that the US Government withdrew from the Vietnam...
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 8th Jul - 11:01pm
    Michael BG, Torry is clear that a tax increases are only viable if the net disposable income of the great majority of taxpayers is increased...
  • User AvatarGraham Evans 8th Jul - 10:29pm
    It's all very well blaming the care sector for its shortcomings but you get what you pay for. Providing social care is extremely labour intensive,...
  • User AvatarMichael BG 8th Jul - 10:28pm
    Joe Bourke, In response to me you make a comment about the poverty trap and the people of Fife being in favour of a UBI....