Damian McBride, Derek Draper and the smears against Tories

The Telegraph has reported:

Row as Number 10 emails ‘smear Tories’
The emails, which made a number of unfounded, innuendo-laden suggestions about the private lives of David Cameron, George Osborne and other Conservative MPs, came into the possession of Paul Staines, who writes the Guido Fawkes political blog…

The prospect of publication [of the emails] alarmed ministers, who feared that they would be accused of orchestrating a smear campaign against senior Tory figures. Some of the emails made lurid claims about Mr Cameron, the Tory leader, and Mr Osborne, the shadow chancellor.

However, there appears to be a degree of trying to spike the story ahead of other papers, because as Guido Fawkes says:

The Telegraph implies that Guido has sold the story to the Sunday newspapers – that is completely untrue – Downing Street tried that same line against the Home Office whistleblower. They are also trying to make out that the story is just about Damian McBride sending gossipy emails to his pal Derek Draper. Utter lies…

Other well known Labour insiders besides Damian McBride – including a government minister – are involved in the operation. Guido has hard evidence that Tory MPs have been smeared, and that a particularly vicious concerted smear operation was mounted against George Osborne, smears that Damian McBride – a civil servant – knows and admits in writing are untrue, yet he was still instrumental in spreading. Some well known lobby journalists have knowingly gone along with it. This is a lot bigger than some minor bloggers spat.

Iain Dale looks to be one of the other people targeted, for he wrote yesterday:

Two weeks ago, on 27 March, I wrote THIS post in which I outlined my suspicions that Damian McBride, Gordon Brown’s chief political, advisor had sent emails to Derek Draper in early February encouraging a smear campaign against me. I then submitted a Freedom of Information and DPA request to the Cabinet Office asking for details of any information they held on me and for details of any emails sent by Mr McBride relating to me. That FOI Request has been acknowledged by the Cabinet Office and is being processed.

What really strikes me about the story so far is the willingness of The Telegraph to try to rubbish the source of information for the story; hence its piece talks about fears of hacking and the possibility of secrets being sold for money – for none of which does it appear to have any evidence.

Usually the media are very reluctant to criticise sources for stories, even when it turns out they’ve supplied duff information. The usual way of trying to rubbish a story someone else has is to get in first with an exclusive interview from another person involved, rather than accusing the source of stories of dodgy behaviour. No surprise really, because in the end the media need sources to be willing to talk, and rubbishing sources isn’t a great way to encourage others to come forward on future stories.

The tragic death of Ian Tomlinson is a good example of this. Clearly some of the ‘police sources’ who provided information to the media initially gave at best very incomplete stories about what had happened. Was that due to innocent error or due to a deliberate attempt at cover-up and blame shifting?

That’s the story of question the mainstream media very rarely puruses because, in the end, they are all heavily dependent on police sources continuing to supply further stories in future. (The Telegraph, ironically, today is a slight exception to this – but its story is very much driven by reporting criticisms voiced by people in the public eye.)

My guess would be that at least some in the media have severe doubts about what they were told because some of the early coverage of the recent anti-terrorist arrests, again heavily dependent on police sources, had far more caveats in them about information not yet being clear, no firm evidence as yet etc, than I remember from previous anti-terrorist operations. I don’t think that’s a coincidence.

As for the Damian McBride story, it will be interesting to see what the Sunday papers bring…

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

8 Comments

  • jim robinson 13th Apr '09 - 11:59am

    I think the public is getting pretty fed up with all the sleaze that is associated with both Labour and Conservatives. Not enough time has lapsed since the Conservatives brought our government into disrepute for anyone to trust them, Labour are certainly doing a good job trying to top the Conservatives. The public seem to regard both parties as no more than dens of thieves out to serve themselves, not the voters. I do note that both Thatcher and Blair ran away to the USA after doing their best to mess this country up. Didnt want to live with their results. I suspect that many more politicians and bankers will be on their way shortly. Disgrace really.

  • jim robinson 13th Apr '09 - 12:01pm

    An additional point. With the MPs using taxpayer money to purchase second homes, renting them out etc. I assume that the Inland Revenue is making sure that the appropriate buy to let and capital gains taxes are bing paid. Or are their different rules for corrupt politicians.

  • Simon Wilson 13th Apr '09 - 12:05pm

    I do find it ironic that Cameron is calling for an apology from Gordon Brown yet he pointedly failed to do so himself when the Tory Candidate in Watford’s campaign of hatred and smear came to light and court.

  • Terry Gilbert 13th Apr '09 - 12:54pm

    “Not enough time has lapsed since the Conservatives brought our government into disrepute for anyone to trust them”

    Shouldn’t this be: “anyone who can remember the early 1990s”. There is a whole generation of young people who have reached the age of political awareness in the last 10-20 years. That seems to me to be why some of the youngest in our own party are so gung ho for the ‘free market solves everything’ model. They never knew what it was like under the Tories.

    Simon: The Watford candidate was hardly at the centre of Cameron’s clique, unlike McBride at Downing St. Nevertheless, its a valid point, as the harrassment of Sal Brinton, the Lib Dem candidate there, went much much further than anything McBride did (as opposed to thinking/emailing about doing).

  • so publish the smears and let the people comcenred state the truth.

  • Mike Hampton 14th Apr '09 - 5:23pm

    I lived for a while in Singapore but had had the choice of there or Hong Kong. The prevailing thinking was that the two places were different in one significant way (politically). That is that in Hong Kong you could do anything you liked until someone called you to account, whereas in Singapore you couldn’t do anything unless someone had told you that you could.
    The attitude of the No 10 advisers appears to fall into the Hong Kong category and Gordon Brown’s response is to demand new guidelines.
    We are increasingly losing our morality to the rule book. No longer is it obvious what is right or wrong so we have to have it spelled out.
    The issue of MPs expenses is similar. The claim by many is that they haven’t done anything wrong as they are within the limits of the guidance. So despite the obviousness of the claim for a patio heater at the taxpayers expense, it is regarded as legitimate.
    This has been the repeated response of this government to every issue. Legislate the problem away. But do the problems go away?

  • I find it rather ironic that the new heroine of the Tory Party in this affair has been revealed by a Tory blog (in a particularly sexist way) of boosting family income by employing offspring…

    http://www.torybear.com/2009/04/totty-watch-results.html

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 21st Aug - 7:54pm
    Innocent Bystander, Rupinder in his article is focusing on the macroeconomic impact of a no-deal Brexit. As Keynes once noted "The theory of economics does...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 21st Aug - 7:50pm
    @ Paul Barker Could you spell out for u,s Paul, your knowledge and experience of Scottish politics, and could you also tell us which particular...
  • User AvatarMartin 21st Aug - 7:19pm
    " I believe that their aim was a pact with the Tories from the time he assumed the leadership. " Your private belief is your...
  • User AvatarRichard Fox 21st Aug - 7:15pm
    This is becoming a real hot topic in the states. I think some of us should put this to conference.
  • User AvatarGeoffrey Dron 21st Aug - 6:45pm
    @MichaelBG/TCO Apropos defence, whether or not increased defence-related expenditure = LD policy, I do believe in an increase, initially to 2.5%. I do not however...
  • User AvatarRob Cannon 21st Aug - 6:35pm
    I completely agree with this perceptive piece by David Warren. Far too many people at senior levels of the LibDems are establishment creatures. Clegg was...
Sat 24th Aug 2019
Thu 29th Aug 2019
Mon 9th Sep 2019