It’s being billed as a huge speech for Ed Miliband, his first chance to place a personal stamp on the Labour party.
2.25 pm
Begins with thanks for advice from all delegates, “some of it unsolicited”, followed by warm tribute to brother David Miliband. Ed dismisses idea he’s more left-wing; David, he says, threatened to nationalise his railway in revenge for Ed stealing his football. Next up on the tribute list is Harriet Harman.
2.27 pm
Then there’s Alistair Darling, praised for “keeping his cool” during the financial crisis; and Jack Straw, for his, well, longevity. Then it’s straight onto the central theme: that Ed now represents the ‘New Generation’.
2.30 pm
A very personal re-telling of how Ed’s family fled the Nazis to come to Britain to build a new life in freedom, has the conference hall in silence. Interestingly stresses that he was born into the Labour party, a counterpoint to Blair who made a point of saying he chose the party, was not born into it. “My values are my anchor” he says, and that he won’t be dragged (sounded like a fluffed line as it didn’t quite make sense).
2.35 pm
Praises the Labour party for depriving the Tories of a majority, and for driving the BNP out. But “we had a bad result, a very bad result”, and asks the party to resolve to make the Coalition a one-term government — interesting that he’s not vowing to bring it down as early as possible. Then vows he will not be afraid to say unpopular things as elected leader.
2.38 pm
Ed stresses the importance of challenging orthodoxy, and praises how New Labour did so, name-checking “tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime”, all-women shortlists, and equality for LGBT communities.
2.42 pm
A passage on the nation-states, hoping for good Labour results in Scotland and Wales, and stresses Tony Blair’s legacy of peace in Northern Ireland. Also praises Gordon Brown’s record in international aid.
2.44 pm
So how come, asks Ed, that a party with such a proud record could lose 5 million votes between 1997 and 2010? Says Labour became out-of-touch — “I understand your anger” — and that Labour came “to look like a new establishment”. Slightly odd applause line: “If we are not this party, then no-one will be.” Er, yes.
2.47 pm
Interesting: vows to make foreign policy “about values, not alliances” — yet David’s acclaimed speech was all about the value of multinational alliances. And now we’re onto the deficit, and Ed admits cuts would’ve happened under Labour, and that he will support painful cuts being brought forward by the Coalition. However, he attacks pace of cuts, saying it would be responsible to halve the deficit over one parliament; so nailing his colours to the Darling austerity plan — does that mean Ed (or Yvette) aren’t in line to become shadow chancellor?
2.52 pm
Ed stakes the claim to the patriotic centre-ground: a “true patriot”, he argues, would want to ensure a society fit for children to grow up in. This means promoting growth and tackling inequality. (In parentheses, there have been quite a few verbal slips so far. He doesn’t look nervous, so must be unfamiliarity with the autocue.)
2.55 pm
Now it’s immigration, and Ed says we must front-up on the issue, and “must challenge old orthodoxy that flexible labour markets are always the answer”; be interesting to know what this rhetoric means in policy terms.
2.59 pm
“Red Ed” socks it to the unions, says he “will have no truck” with unions which call for irresponsible strikes. But says responsibility applies also to business. Now a full-frontal attack on inequality, invoking The Spirit Level’s argument that more equal societies are happier societies.
3.02 pm
Very nuanced/bland line on welfare: benefits must be there for those who need them, but we must help back to work those who can. Nothing the Coalition (or any mainstream party anywhere) can disagree with there. Calls on Labour to oppose post office cuts, oppose cheap supermarket booze which undermines pubs.
3.05 pm
Praises role of families: through them that we learn right or wrong. Jarring line about how he feels this especially keenly since the birth of his son. “Government can in itself become a vested interest,” admits Ed — first speaker this Labour conference I’ve heard admit this.
3.08 pm
A very welcome section: Ed wants the Labour party to reclaim the mantle of civil liberties. Please do, Ed: it was a lonely fight for “the Liberals” (yes, he’s succombed to the Labour party’s puerile feigned inability to recall our party’s name) in the last parliament. There’s only lukewarm applause in the hall.
3.10 pm
The Iraq war was wrong, says Ed: this is tomorrow’s headline, I suspect. Again, interestingly half-hearted applause from the audience: either they’re conflicted or bored (or both).
3.13 pm
“I support changing our voting system, and will vote ‘Yes’ on AV. And yes we should have an elected House of Lords after taking about it for a hundred years. And yes we need more local democracy.” It’s a good job Labour got booted out, and the Lib Dems were able to get these policies in government then, isn’t it, Ed?
3.15 pm
“I will be a responsible leader of the opposition” — calls for much better, more grown-up public debate. Dismisses the ‘Red Ed’ tag (“Come off it”), and declares he will lead an optimistic party, a “new generation” that will change the face of Britain.
What did Voice readers make of Ed’s speech?
4 Comments
The boy [Ed Milliband] done good. Quite a bit of good LibDem stuff in his speech as well. What a pity he wasn’t leader in May & the numbers broke the way they did. The next few years are going to be really interesting
Your commentary sounds like there were lots of good things in his speech. AV, Civil Liberties, Iraq war, cuts, benefits, union strike sceptic, fairer society. If he doesn’t want to join with the Lib Dems, maybe he wants to poach a few.
The first Ed Milibrand speech was Labour middle ground lite,Miliband lite and British Economy lite.Although he supported policies that are on side with Liberal Democrat values and beliefs including important support for `Fair Votes’ with AV on May 5th 2010.
The new Labour Leader also would have voted against invasion of Iraq in March 2003 had he been an MP then and would have opposed incursion of Civil Liberties with the initial Labour prposal of 90 days detention that L/D`s opposed and campaigned to reduce.
‘
The talk in the corridors of Government will not be as much this new Leader speech but the future direction of his brother`s travel.
There are parts of the speech I liked. His support for the Darling plan, his support for some coalition policies, his support for AV, support for tackling climate change. This was not the opportunistic, destructive opposition I feared we might get. And I think they are sensible politically, because, to have a chance of winning the next election, he needed to tack back towards the centre ground.
He’ll get a honeymoon, but he’s got serious challenges. Having won the leadership with a campaign from the left, once the honeymoon is over, he’s going to be under pressure from the left, who voted for him, expecting more leftwing policies and a more confrontational approach to the coalition.
Yesterday, I was really struck by what Ed Balls said to the press. After the other losing leadership contenders had avoided saying anything which might be seen as disloyal to Ed Miliband, Ed Balls repeated his arguments attacking the Darling plan. As Ed Balls was deeply implicated in the factionalism of the Brown-Blair years, that was interesting. I wonder if it was a subtle pitch by Ed Balls for leadership of those who will be unhappy when Ed Miliband shifts towards the centre ground.
Ed Miliband made a great deal of his being a new political generation. I think that’ll work for a bit, because he does come over as fairly personable, and the public will give him the benefit of the doubt for a bit. He needs to try to distance himself from Gordon Brown, so that when he attacks the coalition over the cuts, the counter-accusation that it’s all his fault won’t stick. But he was the author of the Labour manifesto and many of those he’ll appoint to the shadow cabinet were leading members of the previous government, so it’s going to be fairly easy for the Tory press to tie him to the previous government.
I thought it was interesting that he attacked the Tories and not the Liberal Democrats, and has adopted a number of Lib Dem policies. This is a threat and an opportunity for the Lib Dems. He’s trying to steal our voters. But it will also make a 2015 Lib Dem/Lab coalition more viable.
I suspect that his previous statement that he won’t form a coalition with the Lib Dems with Nick Clegg as leader will be quietly forgotten. It’ll be interesting what he’ll say if a journalist reminds him of it.