Emergency motion: tougher action on banks and bonuses

Liberal Democrat Voice at Conference

On Lib Dem Voice: Reportage | Contribute
On the official party website: Conference home
Watch Live on BBC Parliament

Sunday morning’s emergency motion debate was on banking, moved by sometime Lib Dem Voice contributor Prateek Buch. The motion called for “banks supported by the taxpayer to be broken up into smaller, safer entities” alongside criticising banker remuneration and the Merlin project which is called “weak” and “insufficient”. Investment and retail banking should also be separated according to the motion.

The motion also called for Liberal Democrats to “ensure that the recommendations of the Vickers Commission are carried out in full”. As the commission has yet to report, that is a rather risky proposition – but with the general mood about major banking reform promising to back something whose details we don’t yet know didn’t seem to concern most people. (As it happens, I think the Commission’s recommendations are likely to be ones the party will want to support and to see enacted promptly, but outsourcing policy making in such a way on other topics would probably have been very controversial.)

The motion was passed overwhelmingly, with only a small number of votes against and in a hall much fuller than usual for a Sunday morning emergency motion slot.

Meanwhile, Caron Lindsay has asked the apposite question When is it ok to scream and swear at a 14 year old?

UPDATE: The Social Liberal Forum, who proposed the motion, have written up the debate on their site.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Conference and News.
Advert

One Comment

  • The motion also asserted the need to support ‘Mutuals’ . Let us hope that when the Banks are broken up a goodly proportion of the retail High St Banks are re/mutualised-starting with Norther Rock.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarThomas 15th Oct - 5:40am
    Richard Easter, Arnold Kiel - I agree with the renationalization of various public services including prison, security and public transport. But the Libdem can differentiate...
  • User AvatarRichard Easter 14th Oct - 11:44pm
    As Peter Hitchens said - hardly anyone would consider privatising the navy a good idea, so the idea that some things are best provided by...
  • User AvatarNigel Jones 14th Oct - 11:04pm
    Our Chief executives tend to be in the background as far as ordinary members are concerned. I hop Mike will engage with us about how...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 14th Oct - 10:33pm
    @ Richard Underhill, "Do you agree that the Bank of England and its euro equivalent have been printing money on a large scale? (although printed...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 14th Oct - 10:17pm
    Dennis Wake, Is money simply a tax voucher? Think about it. If the Govt were to print slips of paper with the words "This is...
  • User AvatarIan Martin 14th Oct - 10:16pm
    Arnold Kiel " liberty, equality and community. No private enterprise is interested in any of them". The Scott Bader Commonwealth for one.