Emergency motion: tougher action on banks and bonuses

Liberal Democrat Voice at Conference

On Lib Dem Voice: Reportage | Live Twitter Stream | Contribute
On the official party website: Conference home

Sunday morning’s emergency motion debate was on banking, moved by sometime Lib Dem Voice contributor Prateek Buch. The motion called for “banks supported by the taxpayer to be broken up into smaller, safer entities” alongside criticising banker remuneration and the Merlin project which is called “weak” and “insufficient”. Investment and retail banking should also be separated according to the motion.

The motion also called for Liberal Democrats to “ensure that the recommendations of the Vickers Commission are carried out in full”. As the commission has yet to report, that is a rather risky proposition – but with the general mood about major banking reform promising to back something whose details we don’t yet know didn’t seem to concern most people. (As it happens, I think the Commission’s recommendations are likely to be ones the party will want to support and to see enacted promptly, but outsourcing policy making in such a way on other topics would probably have been very controversial.)

The motion was passed overwhelmingly, with only a small number of votes against and in a hall much fuller than usual for a Sunday morning emergency motion slot.

Meanwhile, Caron Lindsay has asked the apposite question When is it ok to scream and swear at a 14 year old?

UPDATE: The Social Liberal Forum, who proposed the motion, have written up the debate on their site.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Conference and News.
Advert

One Comment

  • The motion also asserted the need to support ‘Mutuals’ . Let us hope that when the Banks are broken up a goodly proportion of the retail High St Banks are re/mutualised-starting with Norther Rock.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User Avatarfrankie 19th Aug - 7:21pm
    Well I suppose in the event of successful Scottish Indy ref, we could revoke Gove's, IDS and the rest citizenship and deport them to Scotland....
  • User AvatarMartin Land 19th Aug - 7:14pm
    Revoking citizenship by the Home Office would be an improvement over the current system where it is seemingly revoked by the Press.
  • User AvatarImaduddin Ahmed 19th Aug - 6:58pm
    @Richard Flowers - good initiative. I would like our parliamentarians to attempt to abolish revocation altogether, and you are right - that is the most...
  • User AvatarSimon Shaw 19th Aug - 6:25pm
    Actually, Andy, it was much more a case of Clegg and the Lib Dems getting shafted by Labour on AV, Labour had AV in their...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 19th Aug - 6:24pm
    Having watched this television programme by Ed Stafford and been shocked by it, the obvious question is what does Councillor Kelly propose to do about...
  • User AvatarJames Pugh 19th Aug - 5:49pm
    "Indian subcontinent* ancestry"
Sat 24th Aug 2019
Thu 29th Aug 2019
Mon 9th Sep 2019