Emergency motion: tougher action on banks and bonuses

Sunday morning’s emergency motion debate was on banking, moved by sometime Lib Dem Voice contributor Prateek Buch. The motion called for “banks supported by the taxpayer to be broken up into smaller, safer entities” alongside criticising banker remuneration and the Merlin project which is called “weak” and “insufficient”. Investment and retail banking should also be separated according to the motion.

The motion also called for Liberal Democrats to “ensure that the recommendations of the Vickers Commission are carried out in full”. As the commission has yet to report, that is a rather risky proposition – but with the general mood about major banking reform promising to back something whose details we don’t yet know didn’t seem to concern most people. (As it happens, I think the Commission’s recommendations are likely to be ones the party will want to support and to see enacted promptly, but outsourcing policy making in such a way on other topics would probably have been very controversial.)

The motion was passed overwhelmingly, with only a small number of votes against and in a hall much fuller than usual for a Sunday morning emergency motion slot.

Meanwhile, Caron Lindsay has asked the apposite question When is it ok to scream and swear at a 14 year old?

UPDATE: The Social Liberal Forum, who proposed the motion, have written up the debate on their site.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Conference and News.
Advert

One Comment

  • The motion also asserted the need to support ‘Mutuals’ . Let us hope that when the Banks are broken up a goodly proportion of the retail High St Banks are re/mutualised-starting with Norther Rock.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • cim
    The big barrier to mass adoption of driverless cars isn't technological (not that the technology is easy) but legal. With a driver-controlled vehicle, liabil...
  • Mick Taylor
    @PM LDV word limits do not always make it possible to say everything one might like! Yes, some people, myself included, have been able to make other provision...
  • Peter Davies
    @Jana "Can I ask how you believe getting a mortgage and then paying it off ‘preferentially treated’? I do know that Mortgage Tax relief once existed but tha...
  • Mohammed Amin
    I agree with James Hill. I found our Party Leadership's reaction disappointing, and am pleased that some MPs have already pushed back. I think Ed Davey has ...
  • Alex Macfie
    Perhaps we should take a few steps back before getting hooked on the tech bros' kool-aid. It's a serious error to assume that whatever technology is currently i...