Emergency motion: tougher action on banks and bonuses

Sunday morning’s emergency motion debate was on banking, moved by sometime Lib Dem Voice contributor Prateek Buch. The motion called for “banks supported by the taxpayer to be broken up into smaller, safer entities” alongside criticising banker remuneration and the Merlin project which is called “weak” and “insufficient”. Investment and retail banking should also be separated according to the motion.

The motion also called for Liberal Democrats to “ensure that the recommendations of the Vickers Commission are carried out in full”. As the commission has yet to report, that is a rather risky proposition – but with the general mood about major banking reform promising to back something whose details we don’t yet know didn’t seem to concern most people. (As it happens, I think the Commission’s recommendations are likely to be ones the party will want to support and to see enacted promptly, but outsourcing policy making in such a way on other topics would probably have been very controversial.)

The motion was passed overwhelmingly, with only a small number of votes against and in a hall much fuller than usual for a Sunday morning emergency motion slot.

Meanwhile, Caron Lindsay has asked the apposite question When is it ok to scream and swear at a 14 year old?

UPDATE: The Social Liberal Forum, who proposed the motion, have written up the debate on their site.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Conference and News.
Advert

One Comment

  • The motion also asserted the need to support ‘Mutuals’ . Let us hope that when the Banks are broken up a goodly proportion of the retail High St Banks are re/mutualised-starting with Norther Rock.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Charley Hasted
    Brad- English and Welsh Law hold sex and gender to be interchangeable terms. Ergo Trans women are entitled to access services on the same terms as Cis women exc...
  • Peter Watson
    "If the Tories were serious about rebuilding our shattered economy fairly ..." Curiously, particularly given that Lib Dems had some input into a few budgets in...
  • Peter Watson
    @William Francis "The affluent already are iffy about the idea of giving up their income for improving the lot of the poor" This is a very interesting point, g...
  • Roland
    @Alex B re: Freeports I expect the typical Brexiteer didn't know that the EU permitted freeports and that the UK had 12 prior to 2012. Nothing I've seen about ...
  • Roland
    @Marco >Where on earth does this figure come from and what is the “full benefits” or herd immunity compared to plain old herd immunity? With C...
Thu 11th Mar 2021