Mark Pack

European Commissioners debate as Chris Huhne pushes for tougher environmental targets

By | Tue 15th February 2011 - 1:55 pm

The Guardian reports,

Europe’s climate chief [Connie Hedegaard] insisted on Monday that tougher greenhouse gas targets would improve the EU’s economic performance, rather than push businesses overseas, as companies and green campaigners tussled over whether current emissions goals were too weak…

Her words came as a row flared between Chris Huhne, the UK’s climate change secretary, and Günther Oettinger, the EU’s energy commissioner, over whether to toughen the European climate target from a cut of 20% in emissions by 2020 to a 30% cut.

Last week, Oettinger warned: “If we go alone to 30%, you will only have a faster process of de-industrialisation in Europe. We need industry in Europe, and industry means CO2 emissions.”

Huhne, who has been a prime mover behind the plan for higher targets, hit back angrily, telling the Guardian: “The short-termist view of sticking to 20% doesn’t cut the mustard. Moving to 30% would give our businesses a head-start in new green industries and get us off the oil hook quicker, insulating us from oil price spikes.”…

Hedegaard was careful to avoid any explicit criticism of her fellow commissioner, and insisted that there was “debate” but no row within the European commission on the issue. She cited research from across Europe showing that member states had increased their economic output over the past two decades while cutting emissions, and pointed out that if EU leaders kept to promises made earlier this month to improve energy efficiency, then the EU would easily surpass its 20% target in any case.

You can read the full story here.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

One Comment

  • Simon McGrath 15th Feb '11 - 9:18pm

    So how much de industrialisation is Chris Huhne willing to support?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Jenny Barnes
    "The idea that VAT is not charged on essentials " Sounds like a nice idea. Definitions are tricky though. Is a Jaffa Cake a biscuit? or a Cake? How about de...
  • Stephen Nash
    @Peter Davies and @Rob Heale. I support the proposals and Basic Income. The huge reduction of shame and uncertainty for applicants for 'benefits', along with ...
  • Peter Davies
    @Rob Heale: You can't really end poverty through taxation unless your tax system unless you include rebates for those without enough income to pay tax. That's k...
  • Alex Macfie
    Take on Big Tech — properly. Not with user bans and age verification. Not only are these shockingly paternalistic and illiberal, but they wil...
  • Rob Heale
    The boldest option would be to adhere to our aims set out in the Party Constitution to be free from poverty. People living in poverty can rarely be free because...