On 21 July 2006 staff at the Electoral Commission sent an email to representatives of all the main political parties, including Peter Watt (and myself, which is why I happen to have a copy). Click on the thumbnail to see the full version.
Attached was a draft new edition of the Electoral Commission’s guidance on donations. This is what paragraph 4.29 of the document said:
If the original source of the donation is someone other than the individual or organisation that transfers the donation to the party, the individual or organisation making the transfer is acting as an agent for the original donor. Where a person acts as an agent in making a donation, they must ensure that the party is given all the relevant information as listed at paragraph 5.4 (s. 54 (6)). Transferring a donation to an agent rather than directly to a party must not be used as an attempt to evade the controls on permissibility and transparency.
In other words: a donor can’t hide a donation by passing it on through other people. This information was in previous editions of the guidance, and was also (using exactly the same words) in the final version published by the Electoral Commission (and available on their website, see page 19).
Follow @LibDemVoice on Twitter
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Anyone try the West Cliff Lift?
Dropping the 1p tax rise has political costs too
Matthew Sweet on conspiracy theorists and the media
A blob-chart way of dissecting Britain's prosperity failure
A matter of trust
New housing planned for Fishmore Road - Environment Agency wants more information
Michael's weekly ward surgeries today! #dundeewestend
Ewan Hoyle
James Baillie
Tom
Bob Hale
4 Comments
Is not the Electoral Commission guideline quite clear that it is the responsibility of the donor and the agent, and not the party, to check? “Where a person acts as an agent” they have to tell the party. The party does not appear to have any reciprocal duty in law to check.
But Peter Watt has said he was aware of it and should then have reported it.
Thank you David. The weakness of your “rebuttal” is most reassuring 🙂 Toodle pip.
It’s also interesting that BBC is saying Hilary Benn turned down a donation from Miss Kidd “because he thought Mr Abrahams should give his £5,000 in his own name.” If that’s right how did the perspicacious Mr Benn know that the money was in fact coming from Mr Abrahams. And if Hilary Benn knew, why didn’t Harriet Harman?
2 Trackbacks
[…] sat in the same Electoral Commission meetings as me. He had received the same emails as myself (including this one). He’d had the same document from the Electoral Commission as me saying, “ Transferring a […]
[…] sat in the same Electoral Commission meetings as me. He had received the same emails as myself (including this one). He’d had the same document from the Electoral Commission as me saying, “ Transferring a […]