A turnout statistic

Turnout at British general elections dropped by 45 percentage points between 1964 and 2005 amongst the under 25s. It dropped by only 2 percentage points amongst the over 64s.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

21 Comments

  • Hmm, what’s the source for that?

    And is that a percentage of absolute numbers, or as a percentage of the share of the population? There are quite a lot more over-64s in 2005 then in 1964.

  • Oliver Mantell 22nd Mar '09 - 11:53am

    For those not aware of it, this is an interesting report pertinent to the subject: http://www.powerinquiry.org/report/index.php

  • Late 60s, I think.

  • Voting age reduced to 18 in 1970.

  • Put bluntly:
    Young people don’t vote and they get tuition fees, a lower minimum wage rate and politicians who don’t speak out about the demonisation of young people.

    Pensioners do vote and they got a purely gratuitious extra £60 in January/February

  • If you were under 25 in 1964 you would have been born in 1939 or before, which spookily would have made you over 64 in 2005…

    (I assume the 2% reduction in turnout is due to premature death).

  • Liam in Preston 23rd Mar '09 - 6:30am

    Yeah I am all in favour of promoting voting turnout among the young, but this “statistics can prove anything” stuff doesn’t help!

  • The Bridgewater by-election was held on 12 March 1970.

  • Alix Mortimer 23rd Mar '09 - 10:26am

    “The internet generation is often banned from talking politics on forums or in their social groups”

    Seriously?? What’s the rationale given for that?

    Mind you, sometimes a ban on something is the surest way to get people interested in it…

  • “The internet generation is often banned from talking politics on forums or in their social groups.”

    Isn’t there often a ban on politics in old people’s homes?

  • David Allen 23rd Mar '09 - 1:22pm

    When they stick me in a home, I’ll probably want politics banned. Imagine being stuck there listening to all those Tories….

    The internet is different. If people want to get away from Huw Dawson talking politics, one click and they’re free!

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDavid Raw 13th Dec - 12:26am
    East Dunbartonshire. I have come to think over the last three weeks that not enough attention was being paid to minding home ground. Hope I'm...
  • User AvatarSean Blake 13th Dec - 12:15am
    Along with a few others, I warned it was obvious that the big bus leader’s call to revoke Article 50 before the start of a...
  • User AvatarMichael BG 13th Dec - 12:12am
    I agree with Dan M-B at 11.24pm, we need to look at our non-Brexit policies to discover which were popular. I am particularly interested in...
  • User AvatarMichael 1 12th Dec - 11:52pm
    Sorry didn't cut and paste full list: Lib Dems Holds forecast Expected at 05:00 Oxford West & Abingdon Likely Liberal Democrat hold 99+% chance forecast...
  • User AvatarMichael 1 12th Dec - 11:51pm
    For those that haven't found it the BBC has likely constituency result based on the exit poll at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2019-50424263 It has "likely" to lose all...
  • User AvatarYousuf Farah 12th Dec - 11:50pm
    @Jackmc You're mostly right and mostly wrong there. It wasn't Labour and the Lib Dems, it was the SNP and the Lib Dems. And this...
Tue 7th Jan 2020