New research service offered to election candidates

The newly launched Get Elected research firm says that,

If you’re a candidate using Get Elected, you get the support you need when and how you need it.  With our bank of political researchers, varying not just in geography, but expertise and political affliation, you’ll get the researcher that best suits your needs – and one you can trust.  As we work for candidates across all political groups, we are confident in being able to find someone suitable for your campaign.

Candidates are used to making use of their own resources, that of volunteers and those of their party. So is there a gap for a commercial service offering to sell such services? The idea of having research as and when you want it could have appeal to some, though with money playing a much smaller role in British politics than in American politics, it’s not so obvious if enough people will have the funds and willingness to pay for such external services.

I mention America because this style of campaign organisation – buying in key services from external, non-party suppliers – is very much a feature of politics there, although in Britain the range of services brought in is typically much narrower and more technical (e.g. paying for printing but not for research). Other similar Western democracies, such as Canada, Australia and New Zealand, fall much more in to the British than the American pattern.

I asked Get Elected’s founder, James Knight about this and he said:

Interesting you mention this importing of American style politics – it’s true an inspiration when starting this was seeing the nature of US politics first hand, in the 2004 and 2008 presidential elections.

More generally, I started this project for a number of reasons:

1) For the candidates – I wanted to ensure that all candidates, even those outside the Party inner circles, or without much party financial backing, would be able to draw upon research services for their campaign. In addition, it seems to me that PPCs can sometimes float around in a lonely no-man’s land between the various levels of the Party hierarchy, and would therefore welcome this kind of individual relationship with a researcher.

2) For the researchers – In particular at present, with cut-backs across many political sectors, there are now experienced and qualified researchers working on a more flexible basis or part-time, which I wanted to try and make the best of.

3) More generally – this type of service seems to better match the needs of PPCs than the static 9-5 support they may previously have used. Campaigns are now about reacting with speed to developments and at all times being on top of a rapidly changing political environment.  I decided that being able to draw on research and support if and when needed was not only more cost-efficient but would actually provide a better service to candidates (and in turn voters).

In order to deal with the issue that research can be a very partisan activity, the firm is intending to have teams of Labour, Conservative and Liberal Democrat researchers, so candidates can use a team who are sympathetic to their aims and understand their ways of working. James Knight is heading up the Conservative team and Stewart Munn is heading up the Labour team. No news as yet on who will head up the Lib Dem team. Again, to quote James Knight:

For the Lib Dem side of things, we are actively seeking a Head of our Lib Dem Research team, but at present do have Lib Dem researchers involved.  As a whole Get Elected is an apolitical organisation, but the individual teams are made up of Party members to ensure the candidate knows they are working with someone on their side.

My first reaction to news of this service was sceptical, but with good research people it may carve out a niche for itself. And certainly it’s good to see people experimenting with different ways of doing politics and supporting candidates.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.


  • Martin Land 25th Jul '09 - 7:23pm

    Interesting; but I remain cautious. One can see the need. For example, PPC’s of whatever party who are not, in these days of vicious targeting, receiving support from their party but nevertheless would like to ‘have a go’ could feel a need. But this implies that they have to have the financial resources available to pay for it.

    Almost certainly personally, given the almost guaranteed resistance of local party officers to anything more radical than changing from milk to Coffeemate.

    In America the greater importance of candidates and their capacity to raise funds and spend them independently of party organisations makes this type of service both more available and more relevant.

    Finally when you need such a service most, along comes ‘Xp per elector’ to really slow it down.

    Interesting; but with many reservations…

  • Andrew Suffield 25th Jul '09 - 7:27pm

    The problem with these ‘services’ is that they inevitably become centres of power for manipulating the government, staffed with people who are trying to achieve personal policy goals.

    This one appears to be attempting to do this for every party via a set of teams.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Chris Perry
    It would be nice to hear from a few people in Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, please?...
  • Marco
    In my view we should keep the 1p rise whilst raising the income tax threshold to about £16000. Then we could present ourselves as a tax cutting party for low e...
  • Steve Trevethan
    Is it then in order to understand that there is enough money for banks to put some of it in reserve accounts but not enough money for all children to be well fe...
  • Peter Martin
    I seem to remember similar arguments some 40 or so years ago when computers, computerisation, and automation were starting to generate similar concerns. It didn...
  • Joe Bourke
    A 1p rise in income tax would be expected to raise about 5.5 billion across the year, about 2 weeks debt service costs at the current expected cost of circa 131...