Green Investment Bank: the debate in government continues

A quick update to my previous post about the Green Investment Bank, where I wrote:

Largely unreported there has been a heavy debate over whether the Green Investment Bank will in effect simply by a pot for government grants or whether it will have the ability to operate much like a traditional bank. The more bank-like the Green Investment Bank can be, the more it will be able to do with its initial funding if, for example, it is able to issue bonds and underwrite loans. Helped by the backing of some Conservatives, such as Oliver Letwin, Chris Huhne seems to be winning the debate in government both about the degree to which the Bank is a bank and also the extent to which its initial funding is greater than £1 billion. It isn’t a done deal yet however.

That is most certainly still the case, with the debating lines having become much more HM Treasury vs the rest rather than Conservative vs Liberal Democrats. As The Guardian put it yesterday:

Chris Huhne, has become a “hero” to green campaigners, locked in a war of attrition with Treasury officials who wanted it to remain a fund, not a full bank. The liabilities of a GIB would have to go on the national balance sheet, they argued, and so the UK would lose its triple AAA rating. Huhne, a former bond analyst, wasn’t cowed.

But Clegg’s attempt to force a resolution was frustrated by the chancellor not turning up. Though the idea of a GIB is Osborne’s own from opposition, he hasn’t attended a single meeting. Osborne, colleagues say, is reticent to take on his officials after seeing Michael Gove duffed up for taking on his.

It is good to see Chris Huhne and others continue to argue their case so strongly (though it would be even better if the party was enlisting members and supporters to be helpful fellow campaigners rather than to be passive spectators to what is going on in Whitehall).

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in News.


  • Andrew Wiseman 18th Feb '11 - 6:07pm

    The issue is that if the GIB is not able to operate like a bank ie issue bonds, tap into ISAs etc the money available (circa £1bn) will just not be enough. I saw a recent estimate of £40bn being necessary, I doubt the Treasury would be willing to find that level of funding!

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Katharine Pindar
    Simon R. 'Too much redistribution' is a rather problematic idea, it seems to me. You appear to find benefit payments to the poor 'too much', where taxation of t...
  • John Waller
    Tom, you say: ‘This week 70-year-old Russian human rights activist Oleg Orlov was sentenced to two and a half years for criticising the Russian invasion of Uk...
  • Noah
    The problem is that many people don't want the cultural richness that social housing brings, sprinkled around their otherwise exclusive properties. I know se...
  • Roland
    @ Steve Trevethan - notable omission from that TaxResearch report is non-dom taxation, from memory that’s potentially another £3bn Pa. I’m less certain ...
  • Martin Gray
    Exactly Mary...The rest (apart from the local businessman) were uninspiring. Of course the dummy comes out from the mainstream parties . It's odd that those p...