In the run-up to the general election, I wrote about Havering Council’s stated public policy of rejecting applications to join the electoral register from people if they were made on forms downloaded from the Electoral Commission’s own dedicated website. It was a policy that caused complaints from residents as well as raising questions about why a council would blanket reject applications from people using the Electoral Commission’s own nationally advertised website.
This policy arose from Havering Council’s reaction to a previous set of attempts to make false electoral register entries, which led it to decide that it would not accept forms downloaded from the internet, even from the Electoral Commission’s site and even though the law does not allow a council to specify the form someone must use. Instead, the council would post out a second form back to people and only register them if they also filled out that second form. A member of council staff even called members of the public who registered shortly before an election “ridiculous” for leaving it so late (even if the reason might have been that they had just moved).
However, as I wrote, “when pressed as to whether or not the council would reject any recent applications which were made in line with the law but where the person did not return a second form, the council said it would make a judgement during the 5 day period it has to consider registration requests”.
Following me contacting both Havering Council and the Electoral Commission, the council’s stated policy on its website was changed to include the proviso that, “In the run up to the election period, we will accept downloaded forms subject to further integrity checks”.
That left open the question of what Havering Council would do outside of election time or, as is now the case, as we get closer to a referendum. So again I’ve contacted both Havering Council and the Electoral Commission.
The net result is that Havering Council has made a further welcome change in their stated public policy, with their website being altered once again and now says, “Please note that Havering Council does not accept registration forms downloaded from the internet at face value and will make further integrity checks to prevent electoral fraud”.
In other words, Havering Council is now no longer telling people that it is blanket rejecting Electoral Commission forms, either in the run up to elections or at other times. Score one small victory for common sense and one small victory for the public’s convenience.
4 Comments
It is not uncommon for Council legal officers to either breach the law or declare an intention so to do. Were these Council employees social workers dealing with children or electricians on 30k per week, they would be out on their ear with no recompense for being totally incompetent and placing the Council’s operations in jeopardy. But Solicitors and senior admin staff? Cock up big-style with total impunity as often as you like and look forward to a smashing pension..
I wonder what the local MPs think of this. With the forthcoming boundary revisions being based on electoral registration rather than population figures, they could be in for some shocks if they tolerate council officers placing hurdles in front of people who are trying to register.
@Nick (not Clegg)
“I wonder what the local MPs think of this.”
Havering has 2.4 constituencies. On the basis on 2001, 2005 and 2010 results, Romford and Hornchurch & Upminster are safe Tory seats, with right-wing MPs supported by paid organisers well able to get their supporters registered. On the basis of 2006 and 2010, the council is majority Tory as well.
The 0.4 is the Rainham-South Hornchurch part of Dagenham & Rainham, solidly Labour as a whole constituency. I would expect Jon Cruddas ( Labour supporter of AV) to be more concerned.
Thanks for the info, Ian. So its probably to the Tories’ advantage if they get their natural supporters to register and other people eligible to vote but not necessarily Tories fail to do so: not that I would dream of suggesting that there is any sinister intent behind the council officials’ actions.