Havering Council changes its rolling electoral registration policy, again

In the run-up to the general election, I wrote about Havering Council’s stated public policy of rejecting applications to join the electoral register from people if they were made on forms downloaded from the Electoral Commission’s own dedicated website. It was a policy that caused complaints from residents as well as raising questions about why a council would blanket reject applications from people using the Electoral Commission’s own nationally advertised website.

This policy arose from Havering Council’s reaction to a previous set of attempts to make false electoral register entries, which led it to decide that it would not accept forms downloaded from the internet, even from the Electoral Commission’s site and even though the law does not allow a council to specify the form someone must use. Instead, the council would post out a second form back to people and only register them if they also filled out that second form. A member of council staff even called members of the public who registered shortly before an election “ridiculous” for leaving it so late (even if the reason might have been that they had just moved).

However, as I wrote, “when pressed as to whether or not the council would reject any recent applications which were made in line with the law but where the person did not return a second form, the council said it would make a judgement during the 5 day period it has to consider registration requests”.

Following me contacting both Havering Council and the Electoral Commission, the council’s stated policy on its website was changed to include the proviso that, “In the run up to the election period, we will accept downloaded forms subject to further integrity checks”.

That left open the question of what Havering Council would do outside of election time or, as is now the case, as we get closer to a referendum. So again I’ve contacted both Havering Council and the Electoral Commission.

The net result is that Havering Council has made a further welcome change in their stated public policy, with their website being altered once again and now says, “Please note that Havering Council does not accept registration forms downloaded from the internet at face value and will make further integrity checks to prevent electoral fraud”.

In other words, Havering Council is now no longer telling people that it is blanket rejecting Electoral Commission forms, either in the run up to elections or at other times. Score one small victory for common sense and one small victory for the public’s convenience.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

4 Comments

  • Tony Dawson 4th Feb '11 - 7:46pm

    It is not uncommon for Council legal officers to either breach the law or declare an intention so to do. Were these Council employees social workers dealing with children or electricians on 30k per week, they would be out on their ear with no recompense for being totally incompetent and placing the Council’s operations in jeopardy. But Solicitors and senior admin staff? Cock up big-style with total impunity as often as you like and look forward to a smashing pension..

  • Nick (not Clegg) 4th Feb '11 - 10:02pm

    I wonder what the local MPs think of this. With the forthcoming boundary revisions being based on electoral registration rather than population figures, they could be in for some shocks if they tolerate council officers placing hurdles in front of people who are trying to register.

  • Nick (not Clegg) 5th Feb '11 - 4:27pm

    Thanks for the info, Ian. So its probably to the Tories’ advantage if they get their natural supporters to register and other people eligible to vote but not necessarily Tories fail to do so: not that I would dream of suggesting that there is any sinister intent behind the council officials’ actions.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • David Le Grice
    Weird that this appears to be the first LDV article about this, and the first time anyone in the parliamentary party has spoken up about it (as far as I'm aware...
  • Jack
    Delighted to see conference overwhelmingly reject the EHRC guidance (they don't deserve three quarters of that name - I accept they are a commission). People ar...
  • Geoff Reid
    Somebody had to say it eventual!y. Thank you Tom for inviting us to be honest on this matter....
  • Hywel
    Important point there Paul. For all the angst about 'lack of cut through' that has pretty much been the case for most of the time the LIb Dems existed except f...
  • Roland
    @Gwyn, I agree with David Raw about relative urgency. However, even in the list of political reforms, I would put changes to voting way below the changes that n...