Over the summer I blogged about the Treasury’s curious admission that it doesn’t know how much money it spends on, in the words of the question, “branding and marketing”. This week Dizzy Thinks spotted another example; the Treasury doesn’t know how much it spends on heating, electricity or water either. Perhaps it would be easier for someone to just ask what it does know?
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
- Sarah Olney bids to become candidate for Mayor of London
- Making the most of the Government’s belated action on illegal Israeli settlements
- Reform is winning because liberal Britain is not listening to its own society
- ‘I Fear a Target on My Back’ — A Liberal Democrat’s fight for Hong Kong’s freedom
- Somerset’s farmers are on the front line of climate change
Search
Op-eds
-
The liberalism we need: a platform for people to thrive and live their version of a best life (Josh Matthews)
-
Tom Arms’ World Review (Tom Arms)
-
Observations of an Expat: West Bank Settler Sanctions (Tom Arms)
-
Recollections of 9/11 (George Cunningham)
-
Why we need a Trade NATO (Dominic Sokalski)
What can £72 million buy nowadays?
The National Health Service (UK)
John Pardoe, Margaret Thatcher and antisemitism in Finchley
Memories of 9-11
Recent Comments
John B Grout
Excellent piece, Josh. As for seeking others' thoughts on the pitch, here are mine: Labour and the Greens want to do things for you, the Conservatives and R...
David Evans
It's an interesting article, which gives us more to think about, but when it ends with "Government and politics can strive toward this platform ... giving ind...
Neil Sandison
This one of a series of articles recently published in the Liberal Democrat Voice that defines our social liberal values . Frequently the hot house of Westminst...
Pawel Urbanski
This is the right problem to be working on, and I think the answer may be less about the words than about the moments. In my experience people learn what we sta...
Simon Robinson
It's good to have an MP putting herself forward for this. The manifesto seems a bit vague though. All good thoughts and nothing you can really disagree with, b...
8 Comments
Why am I not surprised?
Some years ago I got a job with a household-name state-owned company just weeks before it was privatised. They too had only the most rudimentary accounting system; it could just about say how much money came in and how much went out but anything inbetween was pretty much a mystery.
It also turned out that even the most senior staff didn’t know how to evaluate a capital project even though capital spending was a large part of total spending at the time.
I didn’t stay long!
The Tories are, presumably, blaming this on Labour incompetence, when of course this has nothing to do with the party in charge but instead is a stark example of the inherent flaws of government.
I don’t see any reason for it to be an ‘inherent’ flaw. If ministers spent just a little time and effort thinking about efficiency (or at least requiring their departments to do so) then govt would run a whole lot better. Sadly, the culture seems to be to regard the taxpayer as a bottomless money-well.
So where has the culture come from?
Good question.
My guess is that too many (all?) ministers prefer to rush out a response to any “something must be done” headline in the media without pausing to consider alternatives, especially if the best alternative is likely to be a harder initial sell.
Absent a very clear and determined lead from the PM that value matters over spin, this tendency will soon become the rule. Blame Blair for exacerbating an existing trend.
The implication is that this leaves an open goal for a party with a credible committment to value for money. We can’t in any case go on as before – that way lies national bankruptcy.
I’m afraid I find that explanation rather too similar to the Tory position – ie. that there are no structural problems, it’s just a matter of management. We just need new politicians who will manage things better, and, predictably … we’re the party to do it!
As much as I dislike Labour (and believe me, that is an awful lot) I don’t buy the argument that their ministers are significantly lacking in values when compared to either Tory or LD MPs.
It’s the system that’s at fault. If we can’t offer radical liberalism, we should at least offer radical localism.
I didn’t say “there are no structural problems”. In fact I think the opposite – that there are enormous structural problems and that there is no particular reason to think one Party’s ministers would somehow be systematically better than another party’s ministers.
However, that said the cultural problem that afflicts all parties is so deep that it amounts almost to a structural problem in itself – culture becomes structure.
Agreed, hence why the only solution is to significantly reduce the power-structures of Westminster and Whitehall – by both liberalisation and localisation.