How do the messages on the main political party websites compare?

Comparing the popularity of different words in the latest stories from the the Liberal Democrat, Conservative and Labour Party websites reveals striking differences in the messages being put out by each party online.

Reproduced below are three word clouds, where the bigger a word is the more often it appeared on that party’s latest website stories. The word clouds were generated yesterday (Thursday) based on the then state of each of the three websites.

First, let’s look at the Conservative Party:

Conservative wordle(Click here or on graphic for larger version.)

No doubt about what is central to the Conservative Party’s message – David Cameron. William Hague gets a bit of a look in as does Europe in various forms. The armed forces feature too, but overall the message is pretty much “Vote Cameron”.

Labour by contrast have a very different pattern:

Labour wordle(Click here or on graphic for larger version.)

Whilst you are playing the game of “hunt for the reference to Gordon Brown”, you’ll come across several references to the Conservatives. But references to any Labour figures are distinctly minimal.

As for the Liberal Democrats, it’s a different pattern again:

LibDem wordle(Click here or on graphic for larger version.)

The emphasis here is much more on the party and the team – hence the popularity of “Shadow” and “Minister” rather than simply Nick Clegg’s name. As with the Conservatives, but unlike Labour, words related to issues don’t feature that prominently.

All three of these are only snapshots of what the respective party websites were pushing as stories at one moment in time. However, in each case the pattern seems to reflect an underlying choice of messages that is also reflected in the wider behaviour of all three parties. In that respect, whatever you think of those choices, all three web teams look on message.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Online politics.
Advert

12 Comments

  • Fascinating stuff. Has anyone seen the Labour Party’s new X-Factor style homepage? Oh dear!

  • Ophelia Bottom 13th Nov '09 - 1:11pm

    Very interesting, but shows exactly why the Lib Dems aren’t breaking through into the public consciousness as they should be. Everywhere i look from drugs to economic policy – LDs have better spokespeople with better, more intelligent things to say than the two other parties, but overall – none of this is being punted loudly enough. They don’t look like a viable alternative, because, as the wordle graphic shows, they are far more concerned with being lib dems than shouting about their strong policies. ENERGY/EDUCATION/EVIDENCE BASED POLICY – these are the things I’d like to be shouting out from the page. It might give the public something to think about voting for them for. I looked on the web page to find out who the lib dems stand for – a sound bite to say how their ethos differs from the tories or labour. All there was was waffle about doing it differently. They sound like they’re on the back foot and embarrased about what they are. Shame.

  • This also helps explain why almost no one outside of Westminster knows who Nick Clegg is!

  • Worrying that we have FDP in our cloud!

  • West Midlands Actiis 16th Nov '09 - 12:44pm

    But how can the Liberal Democrat website make references to ‘shadow ministers’ when you don’t have any?

    You are not Her Majesty’s Official Opposition, therefore you have ‘spokesmen’ and ‘spokeswomen’ – not ‘shadow ministers’.

    You wouldn’t be….misleading people by any chance? Surely not?

  • Terry Gilbert 20th Nov '09 - 7:52pm

    How come ‘lineker’ is one of the biggest words for the Tories? As far as I’m aware, Gary hasn’t joined up – at least not publically – or Wikipedia’s out of date if he has! Surely one mention, attending a launch party for Tickets for the Troops – the only mention I can find on their site – doesn’t make his name this big? If it does, then I question the value of this exercise.

  • Terry Gilbert 20th Nov '09 - 7:55pm

    Actually, i’ve just noticed that Johnson Beharry, who also went to the same launch, is also on the Tory word pic – so presumably that one mention WAS enough.

One Trackback

  • By The LDV Friday Five (ish): 20/11/09 on Fri 20th November 2009 at 6:31 pm.

    […] do you least want to be Prime Minister in a year’s time: Gordo or Dave? (43) by Stephen Tall 2. How do the messages on the main political party websites compare? (10) by Mark Pack 3. A Labour gain, but no revival (25) by Iain Roberts 4. Lib Dem Voice publishes […]

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • David Raw
    @ Daniel Walker Has the party costed the amount for changing to the arrangement you describe, Daniel, and what amount does it come to ? For my part I wo...
  • David Raw
    Mick Taylor is correct, and I well remember the late Dr Michael Winstanley (the then Liberal MP for Cheadle) giving the Minister, David Ennals, a torrid time in...
  • Kira Collins
    @Daniel Walker Thank you for that information. I did not know that our position was that laws for the whole of England should be made by an indirectly elected ...
  • Kira Collins
    @Richard Flowers “Sex assigned at birth” just means a doctor looked and gave an answer. Possibly a well informed answer by a trained professional. But it�...
  • Andrew Tampion
    "calls for the regions of England to have similar powers to Scotland, except for a few all-England areas of law which would be decided on by an English Chamber ...