Is 42 days dead?

The BBC’s Nick Robinson thinks it is in spite of the Labour Government’s official denials.

The Lib Dems’ shadow home secretary Chris Huhne wrote here on Lib Dem Voice back in the summer explaining why detaining without trial terrorist suspects for 42 days was wrong both in principle and in practice:

Detention without charge for terrorist suspects has already risen from 7 days, to 14 days, to 28 days just since 1997. The sad truth is that ministers are using this simple number as a proxy to persuade the public that they are tough on terror. In fact, such blunt instruments runs the substantial risk of alienating the communities that we need on board to fight terror.

After all, the police need intelligence and witnesses prepared to give evidence. Britain’s most senior Muslim police officer, Assistant Commissioner Tarique Ghaffour, has warned that these arbitary powers could have a counter-productive effect in the Muslim community, exactly as internment did in Northern Ireland in the seventies.

The fight against terrorism is far too important to be reduced to populist symbols which would substantially curb our hard-won freedoms. This cause is central to our party’s belief in the rule of law and in checks and balances to arbitrary power.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

12 Comments

  • Apparently the government is facing a massive defeat in the Lords on this. Given how hard they found it to get through the Commons the last time then the chances of them getting it passed using the parliament act are negligible

  • It is important to realise that the Council of Europe is not to be mistaken with the Council of the European Union or the European Council, which unfortunately in this case I did get mixed up.

    Hardly the stuff of derogatory remarks however, nor does it deflect from the outside influences over the decision on 42 days.

  • Oh, don’t get me wrong, I want it in the dustbin, I really do.

    What I object to is the theatre going on that tries convince everyone that Westminster is still in control of what laws are made.

  • I most certainly want the government to abide by the rule of law, the rule of law created over centuries to keep the people of the UK free from the Government authoritarianism we are seeing today.

    I have read both reports, however, when I read in the HoL constitutional report, which I dont personally feel goes far enough in ensuring the liberty of an accused, conclusions such as this.

    “We do not regard habeas corpus as significant to the debate about judicial control over extensions of detention time”.

    then I have to wonder who’s rule of law is being used as the baseline. That of our forefathers, or the Napoleonic law of others.

    To suggest that this does not matter, that we are just watching domestic politics, misses the point entirely, because it shouts loud and clear as to whether we are still masters of our own destiny in parliamentary terms.

  • My, you have a nice touch in twisting an argument. I have not suggested in any way that the ECHR is Napoleonic. and yes, I have read it, in detail many times.

    What I have been driving at is that the Counter Terrorism Bill, of which the 42 days detention is only a part, like most (80%) other legislation drawn up, in merely acting as a translation agent to EU directives is no longer solely using English Constitutional law as its legal base, but rather the Napoleonic base that is used by the EU.

    That change has been long, slow and subtle, and has been confirmed by Geoff Hoon in the past, when as the Europe Minister openly admitted that Labour policy was to ignore the legal basis when voting for European legislation.
    http://tinyurl.com/4cdvsy

    To then have a HoL constitutional committee dismiss habeas corpus as insignificant is outrageous, and suggests that the interests of those committee members may possibly lay elsewhere, as suggested by Lord Rannoch during the Lords debate on the Lisbon Treaty.

    Which brings me back to my opening comment, the smoke and mirrors and politics of fear, and that what we see domestically is only theatre.

    IMHO the ECHR report IS having a greater impact than our own domestic politics, which at the moment is only to the good, and will be the primary reason for Brown and the Home Office to drop it.

  • David Evans 6th Oct '08 - 10:49pm

    I do love it when a pro European and an anti European, take an issue which they agree on and argue whose fault it is. Good on you guys. My fivepennyworth, for what it is worth is Europe is good when it supports liberal democracy and bad when it doesn’t. Hence I am not consistently pro or anti. The difference in legal systems between ours and the Napoleonic is a prime example of the problems with big government; one example where two equally valid approaches just don’t mix well.

  • Hywel Morgan 6th Oct '08 - 11:45pm

    “We should all know that this government, nor an incoming Tory one can do anything without the EU making the decision first.”

    When did the EU make the decision on 42 days first?

    Please cite the body making the decision, the date and if possible a link to the relevant proceedings.

    “What I have been driving at is that the Counter Terrorism Bill, of which the 42 days detention is only a part, like most (80%) other legislation drawn up…”

    A nonsensical statistic which relies for its basis on equating the Companies Act 2006 with the SI implementing a directive on the classification of courgettes.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarRuth Bright 14th Dec - 11:06am
    80% of women are mothers. Jo is not some sort of identity politics obsessive or woke weirdo because she talked about childcare and the challenges...
  • User AvatarSopwith Morley 14th Dec - 11:04am
    "Brexit is not the transformational opportunity we saw in it. It is merely a symptom of insecure times. " Arnold, You appear to have learnt...
  • User AvatarNonconformistradical 14th Dec - 11:04am
    Brian - how do you define "Progressive"? The Labour Party isn't progressive - it's peddling a failed philosophy of socialism - and apparently practising dictatorship...
  • User AvatarNick Barlow 14th Dec - 10:55am
    Some interesting comments, and I'm not going to try and respond to them all, but glad to see support here and elsewhere for the idea,...
  • User AvatarPaul Murray 14th Dec - 10:55am
    As someone who has more or less stopped posting on this site, can I just observe that I've come back here and *exactly the same...
  • User AvatarAl 14th Dec - 10:52am
    Only two words are needed to respond to this... Alistair Carmichael.
Tue 7th Jan 2020