First we have Ken Livingstone reporting Lee Jasper to the police for investigation, saying that he hasn’t done anything wrong, but the police should investigate anyway.
Then we have Ken Livingstone today saying Lee Jasper’s computer was broken into, but he hasn’t reported it to the police.
In other words: when he thinks there hasn’t been a crime he calls in the police, but when he thinks there has been a crime, he doesn’t call in the police.
And the logic behind this is…?
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Zack Polanski on the Fringe (Caron Lindsay)
Enough is enough: Women and girls deserve better (Lib Dem Women)
To paraphrase Shakespeare’ ‘something is rotten in the state of Britain’ (Judy Abel)
Born to be a Refugee… (Dalila Henniche Maali)
Tom Arms’ World Review (Tom Arms)
Lib Dem Federal Conference: use the drafting advice service
Is the market for flats in England/Liverpool dead?
X-Ray Spex: Germfree Adolescents
Nether Hambelton emerges from beneath Rutland Water
The targeting of journalists is a real threat to democracy
Café with a view #20: Bedfords Park Nature Discovery Centre
Stanley Unwin is now remembered by a blue plaque at his old home in Long Buckby
Eddie Waring's "Dark Satanic Mills End" was at Hilton Park, Leigh
Write a guest post for Liberal England
How many councillors has Reform UK lost since the May 2026 elections?
Rose Runswick 
Tristan Ward 
Peter Davies 
Judy Abel 
David Allen 
2 Comments
The logic behind this is that Ken is desperate to be seen as the good guy with the good reputation who is being victimised by other people who are not good.
http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com
“He” in para one and two being Jasper? And “He” throughout para three being Livingstone?
But anyway you need to decide what you want.