First we have Ken Livingstone reporting Lee Jasper to the police for investigation, saying that he hasn’t done anything wrong, but the police should investigate anyway.
Then we have Ken Livingstone today saying Lee Jasper’s computer was broken into, but he hasn’t reported it to the police.
In other words: when he thinks there hasn’t been a crime he calls in the police, but when he thinks there has been a crime, he doesn’t call in the police.
And the logic behind this is…?
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Pensions and social care: Ed Davey must offer more than reassurance (Maria Linforth-Hall)
What is happening with the Inclusion and Faith Review? (Simon McGrath)
We need a healthy and free leadership debate (Rosemary Runswick)
Mathew on Monday: Davey has been given a second chance. Now he must show us what his leadership is for (Mathew Hulbert)
The decapitation strategy (Michael Taylor)
How many councillors has Reform UK lost since the May 2026 elections?
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a man falling off a paddleboard - for ever
Lord Bonkers 30 years ago: David Chidgey in the Bird of Liberty
Gophers! - The strange strange show that no one remembers
Delivering in Whickham
Councillor Samantha Williamson joins Lib Dems in Bolton
Senedd bans poem by Wales National Poet
When will reality bite in Wales?
Hywel 
Jason Connor 
Jana Hywel 
Chris Nicholson 
2 Comments
The logic behind this is that Ken is desperate to be seen as the good guy with the good reputation who is being victimised by other people who are not good.
http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com
“He” in para one and two being Jasper? And “He” throughout para three being Livingstone?
But anyway you need to decide what you want.