First we have Ken Livingstone reporting Lee Jasper to the police for investigation, saying that he hasn’t done anything wrong, but the police should investigate anyway.
Then we have Ken Livingstone today saying Lee Jasper’s computer was broken into, but he hasn’t reported it to the police.
In other words: when he thinks there hasn’t been a crime he calls in the police, but when he thinks there has been a crime, he doesn’t call in the police.
And the logic behind this is…?
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Local democracy should not be an excuse to stop building homes (Massimo Ricciuti)
The need for a nationally relevant message (Mark Corner)
Chris Coghlan MP writes…SEND reform must put children with complex needs at the centre; not treat them as an afterthought (Chris Coghlan MP)
What a night! Democrats smash the midterms (Caron Lindsay)
Choosing a new leader in Wales: why the process matters (Steve Aicheler)
Mixed messages on smart glasses
James Earl Ray fled to London after he shot Martin Luther King
Sheila Hancock and Stratford Johns in the original London production of Annie
Paul Spackman to deliver talk on Lloyd George and Europe in Llanystumdwy - He'll also be speaking at our Weekend too!
The Joy of Six 1602
Democracy on fire
Nonconformistradical 
Carl Pierce 
expats 
Peter Davies 
Graham Jeffs 
2 Comments
The logic behind this is that Ken is desperate to be seen as the good guy with the good reputation who is being victimised by other people who are not good.
http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com
“He” in para one and two being Jasper? And “He” throughout para three being Livingstone?
But anyway you need to decide what you want.