First we have Ken Livingstone reporting Lee Jasper to the police for investigation, saying that he hasn’t done anything wrong, but the police should investigate anyway.
Then we have Ken Livingstone today saying Lee Jasper’s computer was broken into, but he hasn’t reported it to the police.
In other words: when he thinks there hasn’t been a crime he calls in the police, but when he thinks there has been a crime, he doesn’t call in the police.
And the logic behind this is…?
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Defining our future in Burnham Britain (Gareth McAleer)
Andy Burnham – new messiah or naughty boy? (Mark Hunter)
“Palestine should be run by Palestinians” so why won’t Britain reckon with what it did? (Alex Cole-Hamilton)
You can’t defend your way to a World Cup… or No. 10 (Tom Reeve)
The financing timebomb in Sub-Saharan Africa: What Britain should do — and isn’t (Rupinder Singh)
Is Farage set to lose Clacton?
Citizenship ceremony
Welsh Lib Dems are short of peers and the Lords is weighted towards London and the South East of England
Another myth exploded: Queen Victoria and the lesbians
"Everyone carried a shopping bag": Muriel Spark on London, 1945
Lloyd George Society Chair - Welsh Lib Dem Peers face extinction
Saving the curlew from extinction in Shropshire
The cinema in a church that became a curry house
Jenny Barnes 
Hywel 
Tristan Ward 
Jana 
Andy Daer 
2 Comments
The logic behind this is that Ken is desperate to be seen as the good guy with the good reputation who is being victimised by other people who are not good.
http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com
“He” in para one and two being Jasper? And “He” throughout para three being Livingstone?
But anyway you need to decide what you want.