First we have Ken Livingstone reporting Lee Jasper to the police for investigation, saying that he hasn’t done anything wrong, but the police should investigate anyway.
Then we have Ken Livingstone today saying Lee Jasper’s computer was broken into, but he hasn’t reported it to the police.
In other words: when he thinks there hasn’t been a crime he calls in the police, but when he thinks there has been a crime, he doesn’t call in the police.
And the logic behind this is…?
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
What can we really do to influence the situation in the West Bank? (Alan Juriansz)
Welcome to Lib Dem Friends of Gaelic Language and Culture (Caron Lindsay)
Going for four in a row in Scotland (Grant Toghill)
Lib Dems call for action on smart spectacles – some constructive feedback (Caron Lindsay)
AI has moved from future threat to present reality (Sean Worrell)
The Joy of Six 1571
Same old, same old from Farage
How Long Has it been?
Oh no, not another by-election
Restoration of Gone to Earth to be shown in London Film Festival
Lib Dem policy is light on politics not on outside expertise
Back to Sandy Campbell and Tsar Nicholas II
Discovery
Starmer makes the ultimate betrayal
Tŷ Newydd National Writing Centre's Open Day - 27 September 2026
Peter Davies 
Graham Jeffs 
Chris Lewcock 
Alasdair Peter Davies 
2 Comments
The logic behind this is that Ken is desperate to be seen as the good guy with the good reputation who is being victimised by other people who are not good.
http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com
“He” in para one and two being Jasper? And “He” throughout para three being Livingstone?
But anyway you need to decide what you want.